| Literature DB >> 28704452 |
Marion Engel1,2, David Endesfelder1, Brigitte Schloter-Hai2, Susanne Kublik2, Michael S Granitsiotis2, Piera Boschetto3, Mariarita Stendardo3, Imre Barta4, Balazs Dome4, Jean-François Deleuze5, Anne Boland5, Joachim Müller-Quernheim6, Antje Prasse7,8, Tobias Welte7,8, Jens Hohlfeld7,8,9, Deepak Subramanian10, David Parr10, Ivo Glynne Gut11, Timm Greulich8,12, Andreas Rembert Koczulla8,12, Adam Nowinski13, Dorota Gorecka13, Dave Singh14, Sumit Gupta15, Christopher E Brightling15, Harald Hoffmann16, Marion Frankenberger17, Thomas P Hofer18, Dorothe Burggraf18, Marion Heiss-Neumann18, Loems Ziegler-Heitbrock18, Michael Schloter2, Wolfgang Zu Castell1,19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in microbial community composition in the lung of patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD have been well documented. However, knowledge about specific microbiome structures in the human lung associated with CT defined abnormalities is limited.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28704452 PMCID: PMC5509234 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical, spirometry and laboratory comparisons of patients and controls.
Data presented as mean ±SD, unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: av. last cigarette (years): average years study participants stopped smoking before bronchoscopy procedure. BMI: body mass index. pO2: partial pressure of oxygen. pCO2: partial pressure of carbon dioxide. FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1s. FVC: forced vital capacity. LABA: long-acting beta-2 agonists.
| study participants | cases with changes in CT | cases without changes in CT | control |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 4 | 9 | |
| 66.6 | 100 | 66.6 | |
| 65.7±7.1 | 59±6.5 | 60±9 | |
| 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 50.3±18.2 | 57.8±16.1 | 27.8±13 | |
| 9.6±9.1 | 3.5 ±3.1 | 13.6±8 | |
| 26.2±4.4 | 28.7±3.8 | 26.0±2.9 | |
| GOLD1:50%; GOLD2:41.7%; GOLD3: 8.3% | GOLD1:25%; GOLD2:50%; GOLD3: 25% | -1 | |
| A: 66.7%; B:25%; C: 8.3% | A: 75%; C: 25% | NA | |
| 72.1±11.6 | 65.7±10.8 | 79.9±8.7 | |
| 35.1±3.8 | 38.0±3.2 | 36.6±1.6 | |
| 0.77±0.16 | 0.72±0.17 | 1.2±0.2 | |
| 59.6±9.3 | 59.1±5.3 | 81.1±3.3 | |
| 58.3 | 50 | 0 |
Fig 1Genus level community composition for COPD patients with and without abnormalities in CT and controls based on PCoA.
(a) Lung derived microbial community composition in severe subtype COPD patients, mild subtype cases and controls were compared based on principal coordinate 1 and 2. (b) Boxplot comparing principal coordinate 1 between case and control samples. (c) Boxplot comparing principal coordinate 1 for severe subtype and mild subtype COPD patients and control samples. P-values were computed based on two-sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests after correction for confounding effects from samples processed during winter or summer, respectively.
Fig 2Diversity of microbial communities derived from lungs of severe subtype cases and mild subtype and control individuals.
(a) Pielou’s evenness and (b) Chao richness of microbial communities on genus level for severe vs mild/control samples. P-values were computed based on two-sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests after correction for confounding effects from samples processed during winter or summer, respectively. (c) Phylogenetic community composition based on 16S rRNA gene fragment sequences in bronchial brushing samples. Bars represent the relative abundance of the most abundant families (>5% in one sample). The remaining families are subsumed as others.
Fig 3Heatmap of genera showing significantly different abundances between severe versus mild subtype cases and controls.
Genera showing significantly increased (a) or decreased (b) abundances in severe vs mild subtype cases and controls. Colors at the top represent COPD subtypes and controls. For each genus, samples were colored based on quartiles of non-zero abundances from light red to dark red. All Samples for which a genus was not present were colored in white.
Fig 4Co-occurrence analysis of bacterial genera.
(a) Microbial correlation network of bacterial genera as a surrogate for bacterial interaction. Each node represents one microbial genus and shading colors (blue, red, green, yellow) highlight microbial communities. Coloring of nodes indicates differences between severe subtype versus mild subtype cases and controls (red colors: higher average abundance in severe subtype cases; blue colors: higher average abundance in mild subtype cases and controls). Communities containing ≤2 genera were not shown. (b) Heatmap showing spearman correlation coefficients between bacterial genera from the four microbial communities. Colors at the upper and left side of the figure indicate the community affiliation of respective genera.