| Literature DB >> 28704449 |
Susana Gómez-González1,2, Susana Paula3, Lohengrin A Cavieres4,5, Juli G Pausas6.
Abstract
Fire is a selective agent shaping plant traits and community assembly in fire-prone ecosystems. However, in ecosystems with no fire history, it can be a cause of land degradation when it is suddenly introduced by humans, as plant species may not be able to respond to such novel disturbance. Unlike other Mediterranean-type ecosystems (MTE) of the world, natural fires have not been frequent during the Quaternary in the matorral of Central Chile, and thus, plant adaptive responses are expected to be uncommon. We evaluated the effect of heat shock on seed survival and germination of 21 native woody plants of the Chilean matorral and compiled information on smoke-stimulation and resprouting, to evaluate the importance of fire-adaptive responses in the context of the other MTE. We found that in the Chilean woody flora negative seed responses to fire cues were more frequent than positive responses. Although resprouting is a relatively widespread trait, fire-stimulated germination is not as common in the Chilean matorral as in other MTE. The seeds of seven endemic species were strongly damaged by fire cues and this should be considered in post-fire restoration planning. However, our results also showed that many species were resistant to elevated doses of heat shock and in some, germination was even stimulated. Thus, future research should focus on the evolutionary causes of these responses. These findings could help to develop strategies for fire management in the Chilean matorral. In addition, they will improve our understanding of the evolutionary forces that shaped this plant community and to better frame this region among the other MTE worldwide.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28704449 PMCID: PMC5507535 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of studied species.
Most of them are dominant species in the Chilean matorral.
| Species | Family | Growth form | Post-fire recruitment | Post-fire resprouting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabaceae | Tree | yes-low [ | yes[ | |
| Salicaceae | Shrub | — | yes [ | |
| Asteraceae | Shrub | yes-low [ | yes [ | |
| Asteraceae | Shrub | — | no [ | |
| Solanaceae | Shrub | — | yes [ | |
| Euphorbiaceae | Shrub | — | — | |
| Euphorbiaceae | Shrub | yes[ | yes [ | |
| Lauraceae | Tree | yes-low [ | yes[ | |
| Asteraceae | Tree | — | — | |
| Asteraceae | Tree | — | yes [ | |
| Anacardiaceae | Tree | yes-low [ | yes [ | |
| Celastraceae | Tree | yes-low [ | yes[ | |
| Polygonaceae | Woody vine | yes[ | yes[ | |
| Monimiaceae | Tree | — | yes[ | |
| Asteraceae | Shrub | yes-low [ | variable[ | |
| Fabaceae | Shrub | — | yes[ | |
| Rosaceae | Tree | yes[ | yes [ | |
| Rhamnaceae | Shrub | — | yes[ | |
| Rhamnaceae | Shrub | yes [ | yes-high [ | |
| Fabaceae | Shrub | — | yes[ | |
| Fabaceae | Tree | — | yes[ |
The family, growth form, and the ability of post-fire recruitment and/or resprouting are also included. (E) = endemic to Chile. (—) Not evaluated or questionable information. (low) observation after low severity fires; (high) observation after high severity fires. Nomenclature and endemic status follow Zuloaga et al. [42].
Effect of heat shock treatments (100°C and 120°C) on the percentage of seed germination and seed survival of 21 common woody species from the Chilean matorral.
| Species | Germination (%) | Survival (%) | Seed response to heat | Germinative response to smoke | Estimated fire response | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 100°C | 120°C | Control | 100°C | 120°C | ||||
| 5.6 (2.4) | 3.6 (2.2) | 2.1 (0.8) | 94.7 (5.2) | 95.8 (3.6) | 97.9 (1.7) | 0 | G[ | Stimulated | |
| 59.1 (19.3) | 0nc (0) | 0nc (0) | 58.3 (19.3) | 0nc (0) | 0nc (0) | - | ? | Inhibited | |
| 78.9 (3.9) | 80.6 (3.4) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0 | 0[ | Unaffected | |
| 8.7 (2.6) | 1.9 | 0nc (0) | 13.8 (2.1) | 1.9 | 0nc (0) | - | 0[ | Inhibited | |
| 98.5 (1.8) | 0nc (0) | 0nc (0) | 98.5 (1.8) | 9.5 | 15 | - | ? | Inhibited | |
| 65.0 (2.1) | 14.0 | 0nc (0) | 76 (8.3) | 67 (1.3) | 71 (7.9) | - | 0[ | Inhibited | |
| 31.9 (5.6) | 38.1 (1.7) | 4.4 | 67.5 (3.4) | 73.1 (3.2) | 51.9 | - | NG[ | Unaffected-Low/ Inhibited-High | |
| 82.2 (1.2) | 76.8 (1) | 80.0 (2.2) | 82.2 (1.2) | 76.8 (2.2) | 80 (1) | 0 | -[ | Inhibited | |
| 90.4 (2.7) | 91.5 (3.9) | 7.5 | 90.4 (2.7) | 91.5 (3.9) | 13 | - | -[ | Inhibited | |
| 95.5 (1.5) | 95.5 (2.4) | 41.0 | 95.5 (1.5) | 95.5 (2.4) | 53.5 | - | -[ | Inhibited | |
| 4.4 (1.4) | 25.6 | NA | NA | NA | NA | G | Variable[ | Stimulated-Low | |
| 6.2 (3.3) | 1.2 (1) | 0nc (0) | 66.3 (6.2) | 45 (11.5) | 0nc (0) | - | -[ | Inhibited | |
| 0.6 (0.4) | 5.6 | NA | NA | NA | NA | G | G[ | Stimulated-Low | |
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 50 (16.3) | 72.5 | 92.5 | S | NG[ | Unaffected | |
| 61.0 (6.1) | 0nc (0) | 0nc (0) | 61 (6.1) | 12.5 | 7.5 | - | 0[ | Inhibited | |
| 87.5 (1.7) | 94.0 | 14.7 | 99.5 (0.5) | 98.5 (1.5) | 14.7 | G | ? | Stimulated-Low/ Inhibited-High | |
| 15.5 (4.1) | 11.0 (3.7) | 0nc (0) | 45 (4.9) | 51 (10.2) | 62 (12.5) | - | 0[ | Inhibited | |
| 5.1 (0.8) | 7.5 (0.6) | 13.7 (4.2) | 78.4 (1.9) | 80 (1.6) | 82.5 (2.6) | 0 | ? | Unaffected | |
| 4.0 (1.4) | 7.0 (1) | 20.0 | 74 (8.6) | 65 (9.1) | 74 (4.8) | G | NG[ | Stimulated-High | |
| 3.5 (0.5) | 9.0 | 2.0 (1.2) | 69 (2.4) | 98 | 100 | GS | ? | Stimulated-High | |
| 17.5 (2.8) | 22.5 (4) | 35.8 | 69.2 (6.2) | 97.5 | 85 (4.4) | GS | ? | Stimulated-High | |
The estimated fire response is also shown, based on the available information on seed responses to fire cues (heat and smoke).The mean value per block is shown (see S1 Table for the number of seeds and blocks of each species). SD values are between parentheses. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and each heat treatment
(*) P < 0.05
(**) P < 0.01
(***) P < 0.001
(nc) = not converged model due to zero values just under heat shock treatment (a negative effect was assumed; GLMM). (E) = endemic to Chile. NA = Not addressed. Seed responses are codified by letters and signs: (G) Stimulated germination; (S) Increased survival. (-) Inhibition; (0) unaffected; (NG) no germination; (?) Unknown. Low = Response expected after low intensity fires; High = Response expected after high intensity fires. Nomenclature and endemic status follow Zuloaga et al. [42].