Literature DB >> 28704314

Visual Feedback Attenuates Mean Concentric Barbell Velocity Loss and Improves Motivation, Competitiveness, and Perceived Workload in Male Adolescent Athletes.

Jonathon J S Weakley1,2, Kyle M Wilson3, Kevin Till1,2, Dale B Read1,2, Joshua Darrall-Jones1,2, Gregory A B Roe1,2, Padraic J Phibbs1,2, Ben Jones1,2.   

Abstract

Weakley, JJS, Wilson, KM, Till, K, Read, DB, Darrall-Jones, J, Roe, GAB, Phibbs, PJ, and Jones, B. Visual feedback attenuates mean concentric barbell velocity loss and improves motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload in male adolescent athletes. J Strength Cond Res 33(9): 2420-2425, 2019-It is unknown whether instantaneous visual feedback of resistance training outcomes can enhance barbell velocity in younger athletes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of visual feedback on mean concentric barbell velocity in the back squat and to identify changes in motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload. In a randomized-crossover design (Feedback vs. Control), feedback of mean concentric barbell velocity was or was not provided throughout a set of 10 repetitions in the barbell back squat. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess changes between conditions, with almost certainly greater differences in mean concentric velocity between the Feedback (0.70 ± 0.04 m·s) and Control (0.65 ± 0.05 m·s) observed. In addition, individual repetition mean concentric velocity ranged from possibly (repetition number 2: 0.79 ± 0.04 vs. 0.78 ± 0.04 m·s) to almost certainly (repetition number 10: 0.58 ± 0.05 vs. 0.49 ± 0.05 m·s) greater when provided feedback, whereas almost certain differences were observed in motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload, respectively. Providing adolescent male athletes with visual kinematic information while completing resistance training is beneficial for the maintenance of barbell velocity during a training set, potentially enhancing physical performance. Moreover, these improvements were observed alongside increases in motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload providing insight into the underlying mechanisms responsible for the performance gains observed. Given the observed maintenance of barbell velocity during a training set, practitioners can use this technique to manipulate training outcomes during resistance training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 28704314     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of affective feedback and competitiveness on performance and the psychological experience of exercise within a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Nicole Trewick; David L Neumann; Kyra Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Punch Trackers: Correct Recognition Depends on Punch Type and Training Experience.

Authors:  Dan Omcirk; Tomas Vetrovsky; Jan Padecky; Sophie Vanbelle; Jan Malecek; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Training for Muscular Strength: Methods for Monitoring and Adjusting Training Intensity.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; W Guy Hornsby; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; David Ulloa-Díaz; Paola Barboza-González; Ángela Rodríguez-Perea; Darío Martínez-García; Mauricio Quidel-Catrilelbún; Francisco Guede-Rojas; Jesualdo Cuevas-Aburto; Danica Janicijevic; Jonathon Weakley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training.

Authors:  Madison Pearson; Amador García-Ramos; Matthew Morrison; Carlos Ramirez-Lopez; Nicholas Dalton-Barron; Jonathon Weakley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stian Larsen; Eirik Kristiansen; Roland van den Tillaar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Landyn M Hickmott; Philip D Chilibeck; Keely A Shaw; Scotty J Butcher
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-15

9.  Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Liao; Xin-Xin Wang; Meng-Yuan Han; Lin-Long Li; George P Nassis; Yong-Ming Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Concurrent and Predictive Validity of an Exercise-Specific Scale for the Perception of Velocity in the Back Squat.

Authors:  Ruggero Romagnoli; Sergio Civitella; Carlo Minganti; Maria Francesca Piacentini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 4.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.