Literature DB >> 28703497

Fast online replanning for interfraction rotation correction in prostate radiotherapy.

Charis Kontaxis1, Gijsbert H Bol1, Linda G W Kerkmeijer1, Jan J W Lagendijk1, Bas W Raaymakers1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To enable fast online replanning for prostate radiotherapy with the inclusion of interfraction rotations and translations and investigate the possibility for margin reduction via this regime.
METHODS: Online daily replanning for a 35-fraction treatment for five prostate cases is simulated while accounting for anatomical transformations derived from fiducial marker data available in our clinic. Two online replanning strategies were simulated, compensating for: (a) rotation-only in combination with a couch shift and (b) both translation and rotation without a couch shift. They were compared against our current clinical protocol consisting of a single offline plan used over all fractions with daily couch repositioning (translations only). For every patient, the above methods were generated for several planning margins (0-8 mm with 2 mm increments) in order to assess the performance of online replanning in terms of target coverage and investigate the possible dosimetric benefit for the organs at risk. The daily DVHs for each treatment strategy were used for evaluation and the non tumor integral dose (NTID) for the different margins was calculated in order to quantify the overall reduction of the delivered energy to the patient.
RESULTS: Our system is able to generate a daily automated prostate plan in less than 2 min. For every patient, the daily treatment plans produce similar dose distributions to the original approved plan (average CTV D99 relative difference: 0.2%). The inclusion of both shifts and rotations can be effectively compensated via replanning among all planning margins (average CTV D99 difference: 0.01 Gy between the two replanning regimes). Online replanning is able to maintain target coverage among all margins, while - as expected - the conventional treatment plan is increasingly affected by the interfraction rotations as the margins shrink (average CTV D99 decrease: 0.2 Gy at 8 mm to 2.9 Gy at 0 mm margin). The possible gain in total delivered energy to the patient was quantified by the decreased NTID ranging from 12.6% at 6 mm to 32.9% at 0 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that fast daily replanning can be utilized to account for daily rotations and translations based on the daily positioning protocol. A daily plan can be generated from scratch in less than 2 min making it suitable for online application. Given the large magnitude of prostate rotation around the LR axis, online correction for daily rotations can be beneficial even for the clinical 8 mm margin and could be utilized for treatments with small margin reduction mainly limited then by anatomical deformations and intrafraction motion. Our online replanning pipeline can be used in future treatments with online MR guidance that can lead to further safe reduction of the planning margins.
© 2017 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; fast plan adaptation; interfraction rotation correction; online daily replanning; prostate radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28703497     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Implementation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy in Routine Care: Opportunities and Challenges in the United States.

Authors:  Charisma Hehakaya; Ankur M Sharma; Jochem R N van der Voort Van Zijp; Diederick E Grobbee; Helena M Verkooijen; Enrique W Izaguirre; Ellen H M Moors
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy.

Authors:  John Rodgers; Rosie Hales; Lee Whiteside; Jacqui Parker; Louise McHugh; Anthea Cree; Marcel van Herk; Ananya Choudhury; Peter Hoskin; Alan McWilliam; Cynthia L Eccles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Focal Salvage Treatment of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Current Strategies and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Marieke van Son; Max Peters; Marinus Moerland; Linda Kerkmeijer; Jan Lagendijk; Jochem van der Voort van Zyp
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept.

Authors:  Dennis Winkel; Gijsbert H Bol; Petra S Kroon; Bram van Asselen; Sara S Hackett; Anita M Werensteijn-Honingh; Martijn P W Intven; Wietse S C Eppinga; Rob H N Tijssen; Linda G W Kerkmeijer; Hans C J de Boer; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Jochem Hes; Mirjam Willemsen-Bosman; Eline N de Groot-van Breugel; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Bas W Raaymakers
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-02

5.  Accuracy of automatic deformable structure propagation for high-field MRI guided prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen; Lars Dysager; Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen; Olfred Hansen; Carsten Brink; Uffe Bernchou
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Plan quality for high-risk prostate cancer treated with high field magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen; Christian Rønn Hansen; Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot; Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen; Olfred Hansen; Carsten Brink; Uffe Bernchou
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-21

7.  In-Air Electron Streaming Effect for Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy With a 1.5 T Perpendicular Magnetic Field: A Treatment Planning Study.

Authors:  Hongdong Liu; Shouliang Ding; Bin Wang; Yongbao Li; Ying Sun; Xiaoyan Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Clinical implementation and feasibility of long-course fractionated MR-guided chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer: An R-IDEAL stage 1b/2a evaluation of technical innovation.

Authors:  M R Boekhoff; R Bouwmans; P A H Doornaert; M P W Intven; J J W Lagendijk; A L H M W van Lier; M J A Rasing; S van de Ven; G J Meijer; S Mook
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17

9.  Daily adaptive radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer using a high field MR-linac: Initial clinical experiences and assessment of delivered doses compared to a C-arm linac.

Authors:  Alex Dunlop; Adam Mitchell; Alison Tree; Helen Barnes; Lorna Bower; Joan Chick; Edmund Goodwin; Trina Herbert; Rebekah Lawes; Helen McNair; Dualta McQuaid; Jonathan Mohajer; Rahul Nilawar; Angela Pathmanathan; Gillian Smith; Ian Hanson; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29

10.  Dosimetric benefits of daily treatment plan adaptation for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Miriam Eckl; Gustavo R Sarria; Sandra Springer; Marvin Willam; Arne M Ruder; Volker Steil; Michael Ehmann; Frederik Wenz; Jens Fleckenstein
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.