Literature DB >> 28703398

Tissue dynamics and regenerative outcome in two resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: A preclinical molecular and histological study in vivo.

Omar Omar1,2, Anna Dahlin1,2, Angelines Gasser3, Christer Dahlin1,2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the molecular and structural patterns of bone healing during guided bone regeneration (GBR), comparing two resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trabecular bone defects in rat femurs were filled with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and covered with either a membrane comprising collagen and elastin (CXP) or collagen (BG). Samples were harvested after 3 and 21 days for histology/histomorphometry and gene expression analysis. Gene expression analysis was performed on the membrane (at 3 days) and the underlying defect compartment (at 3 and 21 days).
RESULTS: At the total defect level, no differences in bone area percentage were found between the CXP and BG. When evaluating the central area of the defect, a higher percentage of de novo bone formation was seen for the CXP membrane (34.9%) compared to BG (15.5%) at 21 days (p = .01). Gene expression analysis revealed higher expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (Bmp2) in the membrane compartment at 3 days in the BG group. By contrast, higher Bmp2 expression was found in the defect compartment treated with the CXP membrane, both at 3 and 21 days. A significant temporal increase (from 3 to 21 days) in the remodeling activity, cathepsin K (Catk) and calcitonin receptor (Calcr), was found in the CXP group. Molecular analysis demonstrated expression of several growth factors and cytokines in the membrane compartment irrespective of the membrane type. Bmp2 expression in the membrane correlated positively with Bmp2 expression in the defect, whereas fibroblast growth factor-2 (Fgf2) expression in the membrane correlated positively with inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa) and interleukin-6 (Il6) in the defect.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide histological and molecular evidence that different resorbable collagen membranes contribute differently to the GBR healing process. In the BG group, bone formation was primarily localized to the peripheral part of the defect. By contrast, the CXP group demonstrated significantly higher de novo bone formation in the central portion of the defect. This increase in bone formation was reflected by triggered expression of potent osteogenic growth factor, Bmp2, in the defect. These findings suggest that the CXP membrane may have a more active role in regulating the bone healing dynamics.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal experiments; biomaterials; bone substitutes; genetics; growth factors; guided bone regeneration; morphometric analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28703398     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Histomorphometric Analysis of Differential Regional Bone Regeneration Induced by Distinct Doped Membranes.

Authors:  Manuel Toledano; Cristina Vallecillo; Aida Gutierrez-Corrales; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Manuel Toledano-Osorio; María-Angeles Serrera-Figallo
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Enhanced osteogenic proliferation and differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells on a porous n-HA/PGS-M composite scaffold.

Authors:  Yaozong Wang; Naikun Sun; Yinlong Zhang; Bin Zhao; Zheyi Zhang; Xu Zhou; Yuanyuan Zhou; Hongyi Liu; Ying Zhang; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Horizontal Augmentation of Chronic Mandibular Defects by the Guided Bone Regeneration Approach: A Randomized Study in Dogs.

Authors:  Anton Friedmann; Stefan Fickl; Kai R Fischer; Milad Dalloul; Werner Goetz; Frederic Kauffmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).

Authors:  Carolin Lindner; Said Alkildani; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Comparison of Different Fixation Methods for Combined Histological and Biomolecular Analysis of Fixed and Decalcified Bone Samples.

Authors:  Sarah Al-Maawi; Priscilia Valenzuela; Eva Dohle; Anja Heselich; Robert Sader; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 6.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?

Authors:  Omar Omar; Ibrahim Elgali; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Multinucleated giant cells within the in vivo implantation bed of a collagen-based biomaterial determine its degradation pattern.

Authors:  Anna Maria Tanneberger; Sarah Al-Maawi; Carlos Herrera-Vizcaíno; Anna Orlowska; Alica Kubesch; Robert Sader; C J Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.