Literature DB >> 28702951

The prevalence of refractive errors among adult rural populations in Iran.

Hassan Hashemi1,2, Payam Nabovati3, Abbasali Yekta4, Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh2, Mehdi Khabazkhoob5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the prevalence of myopia and hyperopia and related factors in underserved rural areas in Iran.
METHODS: Under random cluster sampling, two rural regions were randomly selected in the north and southwest of the country, and 3,061 persons over 15 years of age were invited into the study. After selecting samples, all participants had refraction, measurement of uncorrected vision and visual acuity and ocular health examination by slitlamp biomicroscopy.
RESULTS: Of the 3,061 invitees, 2,575 participated in the study (response rate: 84.1 per cent). After excluding those who met the exclusion criteria or had missing refractive data, eventually there were 2,518 subjects available for this analysis. The mean age of the participants was 44.3 ± 17.5 years (range: 16 to 93 years) and 1,460 of them (58.0 per cent) were female. The overall prevalence of myopia and hyperopia in this study was 25.2 per cent (95 per cent CI: 23.2 to 27.2) and 22.5 per cent (95 per cent CI: 20.6 to 24.4), respectively. The prevalence of myopia increased from 20.9 per cent in participants 16 to 20 years to 32.9 per cent in the 21 to 30 years age group, declined up to the age of 60 years and increased again afterwards. The lowest prevalence was 6.8 per cent observed in the 16 to 20 years age group and the highest was 45.8 per cent in 61- to 70-year-olds. In the final logistic regression model, myopia significantly associated with age, higher education levels and cataracts, while hyperopia associated with age, lower education levels and male gender.
CONCLUSION: In our study, the prevalence of myopia was lower and the prevalence of hyperopia was higher compared to most previous studies. The findings of this study imply that refractive errors vary by age.
© 2017 Optometry Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hyperopia; myopia; rural regions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28702951     DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  7 in total

1.  Refractive and Vision Status in Down Syndrome: A Comparative Study

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Farzaneh Dehghanian Nasrabadi
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-27

Review 2.  Recent Epidemiology Study Data of Myopia.

Authors:  Zhao-Yu Xiang; Hai-Dong Zou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Prevalence of refractive errors and color vision deficiency in a population of industry-workers in Abhar, Iran.

Authors:  Masoumeh Ahadi; Afsaneh Ebrahimi; Saeed Rahmani; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Pattern of refractive errors in Buraydah. How serious is the problem?

Authors:  Sultan H Alrashidi
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

5.  Are the results of handheld auto-refractometer as valid as the result of table-mounted refractometer?

Authors:  Ali Mirzajani; Fateme Qasemi; Amir Asharlous; Abbasali Yekta; Asgar Doostdar; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-22

6.  Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of preeclampsia: Development and external validation of a nationwide health insurance dataset of the BPJS Kesehatan in Indonesia.

Authors:  Herdiantri Sufriyana; Yu-Wei Wu; Emily Chia-Yu Su
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Delphi methodology for symptomatology associated with visual dysfunctions.

Authors:  Mario Cantó-Cerdán; Pilar Cacho-Martínez; Ángel García-Muñoz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.