Literature DB >> 28702909

Lignocellulosic biowastes as carrier material and slow release electron donor for sulphidogenesis of wastewater in an inverse fluidized bed bioreactor.

Luis C Reyes-Alvarado1, Álvaro Camarillo-Gamboa2, Elena Rustrian2, Eldon R Rene3, Giovanni Esposito4, Piet N L Lens3, Eric Houbron2.   

Abstract

Industrial wastewaters containing high concentrations of sulphate, such as those generated by mining, metallurgical and mineral processing industries, require electron donor for biological sulfidogenesis. In this study, five types of lignocellulosic biowastes were characterized as potential low-cost slow release electron donors for application in a continuously operated sulphidogenic inverse fluidized bed bioreactor (IFBB). Among them, natural scourer and cork were selected due to their high composition of volatile solids (VS), viz. 89.1 and 96.3%, respectively. Experiments were performed in batch (47 days) and in an IFBB (49 days) using synthetic sulphate-rich wastewater. In batch, the scourer gave higher sulphate reduction rates (67.7 mg SO42- L-1 day-1) in comparison to cork (12.1 mg SO42- L-1 day-1), achieving >82% sulphate reduction efficiencies. In the IFBB packed with the natural scourer, the average sulphate reduction efficiency was 24 (±17)%, while the volumetric sulphate reduction rate was 167 (±117) mg SO42- L-1 day-1. The long incubation time in the batch experiments (47 days) allowed higher sulphate reduction efficiencies in comparison to the short hydraulic retention time (24 h) in the IFBB. This suggests the hydrolysis-fermentation was the rate-limiting step and the electron donor supply (through hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biowaste) was limiting the sulphate reduction. Lignocellulose as carrier material and slow release electron donor for sulphidogenesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse fluidized bed bioreactor (IFBB); Lignocellulosic biowastes; Lignocellulosic slow release electron donor (L-SRED); Sulphate reduction; Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB); Sulphidogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28702909     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9334-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  36 in total

Review 1.  Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals.

Authors:  Avelino Corma; Sara Iborra; Alexandra Velty
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation.

Authors:  Antonio Velasco; Martha Ramírez; Tania Volke-Sepúlveda; Armando González-Sánchez; Sergio Revah
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Contributions of fermentative acidogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria to lactate degradation and sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Yangguo Zhao; Nanqi Ren; Aijie Wang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays.

Authors:  I Angelidaki; M Alves; D Bolzonella; L Borzacconi; J L Campos; A J Guwy; S Kalyuzhnyi; P Jenicek; J B van Lier
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

5.  Biological sulphate reduction using food industry wastes as carbon sources.

Authors:  Mónica Martins; Maria Leonor Faleiro; Raúl Jorge Barros; Ana Raquel Veríssimo; Maria Clara Costa
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Biological sulfate removal from construction and demolition debris leachate: effect of bioreactor configuration.

Authors:  Pimluck Kijjanapanich; Anh Tien Do; Ajit P Annachhatre; Giovanni Esposito; Daniel H Yeh; Piet N L Lens
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Desulfotomaculum carboxydivorans sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium capable of growth at 100% CO.

Authors:  Sofiya N Parshina; Jan Sipma; Yutaka Nakashimada; Anne Meint Henstra; Hauke Smidt; Anatoly M Lysenko; Piet N L Lens; Gatze Lettinga; Alfons J M Stams
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage water using biogenic hydrogen sulphide and effluent from anaerobic treatment: effect of pH.

Authors:  A M Jiménez-Rodríguez; M M Durán-Barrantes; R Borja; E Sánchez; M F Colmenarejo; F Raposo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 10.588

9.  UASB performance and electron competition between methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in treating sulfate-rich wastewater containing ethanol and acetate.

Authors:  Zhaoqian Jing; Yong Hu; Qigui Niu; Yuyu Liu; Yu-You Li; Xiaochang C Wang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Characterization and activity studies of highly heavy metal resistant sulphate-reducing bacteria to be used in acid mine drainage decontamination.

Authors:  Mónica Martins; M Leonor Faleiro; Raúl J Barros; A Raquel Veríssimo; M Alexandra Barreiros; M Clara Costa
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.