| Literature DB >> 28702450 |
Yeong-Dong Park1, Yun-Jin Park1, Sang-Seo Park1, Hae-Lim Lee1, Hyeong-Hun Moon2, Myung-Ki Kim1.
Abstract
Taping therapy is one of the most conservative treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Preceding research studied on pain control, grip strength, and wrist function but no studies have been reported on electrophysiolgical changes after taping therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of taping therapy for carpal space expansion on electrophysiological in 20 female patients aged from 40s to 60s with CTS. Experimental group applied taping therapy for carpal space expansion twice a week for 4 weeks and control group did not. There were significant differences between distal motor latency (DML) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), but no difference between compound muscle action potential and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) after 4 weeks taping treatment. Also, there was a significant difference in DML, SNCV, and SNAP in between groups. In conclusion, taping therapy for carpal space expansion can help to reduce the pressure of the carpal tunnel in CTS patients with mild symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome; Electrophysiological change; Taping therapy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28702450 PMCID: PMC5498095 DOI: 10.12965//jer.1735002.501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
Physical characteristics of subjects
| Group | Age (yr) | Weight (kg) | Height (cm) | Time since onset (mo) | Affected side | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Both | |||||
| EG (n=10) | 50.50±5.58 | 58.70±6.68 | 156.30±4.71 | 9.92±5.70 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| CG (n=10) | 49.80±6.66 | 62.50±6.62 | 152.80±5.30 | 9.41±6.28 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
EG, exercise group; CG, control group.
Fig. 1Muscle taping.
Fig. 2Expansion taping.
Fig. 3Carpel tunnel taping.
Fig. 4The change of motor nerve conduction after taping therapy. (A) Distal motor latency. (B) Compound muscle action potential. EG, experimental group; CG, control group. ***P<0.001, difference of time in group. ###P<0.001, difference of groups in post.
Fig. 5The change of sensory nerve conduction after taping therapy. (A) Sensory nerve conduction velocity. (B) Sensory nerve action potential. EG, experimental group; CG, control group. ***P<0.001, difference of time in group. #P< 0.05, ###P<0.001, difference of groups in post.