| Literature DB >> 28702201 |
T-P-T Pham1, F Cadoret1, M Tidjani Alou1, S Brah2, B Ali Diallo3, A Diallo4, C Sokhna4, J Delerce1, P-E Fournier1, M Million1, D Raoult1.
Abstract
We report here the main characteristics of five new species, 'Marasmitruncus massiliensis' strain Marseille-P3646T (CSUR P3646), 'Clostridium culturomicum' strain Marseille-P3545T (CSUR P3545), 'Blautia provencensis' strain Marseille-P3502T (CSUR P3502), 'Bacillus caccae' strain Marseille-P3604T (CSUR P3604) and 'Ornithinibacillus massiliensis' strain Marseille-P3601T (CSUR P3601), which were isolated recently from undernourished children's stool samples from Niger using microbial culturomics.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus caccae; Blautia provencensis; Clostridium culturomicum; Marasmitruncus massiliensis; Ornithinibacillus massiliensis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28702201 PMCID: PMC5491483 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2017.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Microbes New Infect ISSN: 2052-2975
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree showing position of ‘Marasmitruncus massiliensis’ strain Marseille-P3646T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbours. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW and phylogenetic inferences obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 500 times to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 90% were retained. Scale bar indicates 2% nucleotide sequence divergence.
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree showing position of ‘Clostridium culturomicum’ Marseille-P3545T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbours. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW and phylogenetic inferences obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 500 times to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 90% were retained. Scale bar indicates 0.5% nucleotide sequence divergence.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree showing position of ‘Blautia provencensis’ Marseille-P3502T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbours. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW and phylogenetic inferences obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 500 times to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 90% were retained. Scale bar indicates 0.5% nucleotide sequence divergence.
Fig. 4Phylogenetic tree showing position of ‘Bacillus caccae’ Marseille-P3604T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbours. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW and phylogenetic inferences obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 500 times to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 90% were retained. Scale bar indicates 0.5% nucleotide sequence divergence.
Fig. 5Phylogenetic tree showing position of ‘Ornithinibacillus massiliensis’ Marseille-P3601T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbours. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW and phylogenetic inferences obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 500 times to generate majority consensus tree. Only bootstrap scores of at least 90% were retained. Scale bar indicates 0.5% nucleotide sequence divergence.