Literature DB >> 28701316

Diagnostic Performance of High Sensitivity Compared with Contemporary Cardiac Troponin I for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Yader Sandoval1, Stephen W Smith2,3, Sarah E Thordsen1, Charles A Bruen2,4, Michelle D Carlson1, Kenneth W Dodd2,4, Brian E Driver2, Katherine Jacoby2,4, Benjamin K Johnson1, Sara A Love5,6, Johanna C Moore2, Anne Sexter7, Karen Schulz7, Nathaniel L Scott2,4, Jennifer Nicholson5, Fred S Apple8,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) vs contemporary cTnI with use of the 99th percentile alone and with a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) to rule out acute myocardial infarction (MI) and serial changes (deltas) to rule in MI.
METHODS: We included consecutive patients presenting to a US emergency department with serial cTnI onclinical indication. Diagnostic performance for acute MI, including MI subtypes, and 30-day outcomes were examined.
RESULTS: Among 1631 patients, MI was diagnosed in 12.9% using the contemporary cTnI assay and in 10.4% using the hs-cTnI assay. For ruling out MI, contemporary cTnI ≤99th percentile at 0, 3, and 6 h and a normal ECG had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5% (95% CI, 98.6-100) and a sensitivity of 99.1% (95% CI, 97.4-100) for diagnostic and safety outcomes. Serial hs-cTnI measurements ≤99th percentile at 0 and 3 h and a normal ECG had an NPV and sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 100-100) for diagnostic and safety outcomes. For ruling in MI, contemporary cTnI measurements had specificities of 84.4% (95% CI, 82.5-86.3) at presentation and 78.7% (95% CI, 75.4-82.0) with serial testing at 0, 3, and 6 h, improving to 89.2% (95% CI, 87.1-91.3) by using serial cTnI changes (delta, 0 and 6 h) >150%. hs-cTnI had specificities of 86.9% (95% CI, 85.1-88.6) at presentation and 85.7% (95% CI, 83.5-87.9) with serial testing at 0 and 3 h, improving to 89.3% (95% CI, 87.3-91.2) using a delta hs-cTnI (0 and 3 h) >5 ng/L.
CONCLUSIONS: hs-cTnI and contemporary cTnI assays are excellent in ruling out MI following recommendations predicated on serial testing and the 99th percentile with a normal ECG. For ruling in MI, deltas improve the specificity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02060760.
© 2017 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701316     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.272930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Renal Dysfunction Influences the Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I.

Authors:  Ian Gunsolus; Yader Sandoval; Stephen W Smith; Anne Sexter; Karen Schulz; Charles A Herzog; Fred S Apple
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Ischemic ST-Segment Depression Maximal in V1-V4 (Versus V5-V6) of Any Amplitude Is Specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (Versus Nonocclusive Ischemia).

Authors:  H Pendell Meyers; Alexander Bracey; Daniel Lee; Andrew Lichtenheld; Wei J Li; Daniel D Singer; Zach Rollins; Jesse A Kane; Kenneth W Dodd; Kristen E Meyers; Gautam R Shroff; Adam J Singer; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Trial design for assessing analytical and clinical performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays in the United States: The HIGH-US study.

Authors:  R H Christenson; W F Peacock; F S Apple; A T Limkakeng; R M Nowak; J McCord; C R deFilippi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-02-15

4.  Evaluation of the Relationship between Early Troponin Clearance and Short-Term Mortality in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozbek; Abdullah Algın; Gokhan Tas; Mehmet Ozgur Erdogan
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.112

5.  Ultra-Fast Label-Free Serum Metabolic Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease via a Deep Stabilizer.

Authors:  Mengji Zhang; Lin Huang; Jing Yang; Wei Xu; Haiyang Su; Jing Cao; Qian Wang; Jun Pu; Kun Qian
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 16.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.