Literature DB >> 28701029

High-risk prescribing in an Irish primary care population: trends and variation.

Catherine J Byrne1, Caitriona Cahir1, Carmel Curran2, Kathleen Bennett1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of the present study were to examine the prevalence of high-risk prescribing (HRP) in community-dwelling adults in Ireland from 2011-2015 using consensus-validated indicators, factors associated with HRP, and the variation in HRP between general practitioners (GPs) and in the dispensing of high-risk prescriptions between pharmacies.
METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional national pharmacy claims database study was conducted. Prescribing indicators were based on those developed in formal consensus studies and applicable to pharmacy claims data. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with HRP and dispensing.
RESULTS: There were significant reductions in the rates of most indicators over time (P < 0.001). A total of 66 022 of 300 906 patients at risk in 2011 [21.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 21.8, 22.1%], and 42 109 of 278 469 in 2015 (15.1%, 95% CI 15.0, 15.3%), received ≥1 high-risk prescription (P < 0.001). In 2015, indicators with the highest rates of HRP were prescription of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) without gastroprotection in those ≥75 years (37.2% of those on NSAIDs), coprescription of warfarin and an antiplatelet agent or high-risk antibiotic (19.5% and 16.2% of those on warfarin, respectively) and prescription of digoxin ≥250 μg day-1 in those ≥65 years (14.0% of those on digoxin). Any HRP increased significantly with age and number of chronic medications (P < 0.001). a) After controlling for patient variables, the variation in the rate of HRP between GPs was significant (P < 0.05); and b) after controlling for patient variables and the prescribing GP, the variation in the rate of dispensing of high-risk prescriptions between pharmacies was significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: HRP in Ireland has declined over time, although some indicators persist. The variation between GPs and pharmacies suggests the potential for improvement in safe medicines use in community care, particularly in vulnerable older populations.
© 2017 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general practice; high-risk prescribing; prescriber variation; prescribing safety; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701029      PMCID: PMC5698567          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  36 in total

Review 1.  Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review.

Authors:  R L Howard; A J Avery; S Slavenburg; S Royal; G Pipe; P Lucassen; M Pirmohamed
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Royal; L Smeaton; A J Avery; B Hurwitz; A Sheikh
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-02

3.  Serious bleeding events due to warfarin and antibiotic co-prescription in a cohort of veterans.

Authors:  Michael A Lane; Angelique Zeringue; Jay R McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Hospitalizations due to preventable adverse reactions-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nidhi S Patel; Tejas K Patel; Parvati B Patel; Viren N Naik; C B Tripathi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Prophylaxis and treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal side-effects.

Authors:  M Lazzaroni; G Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 6.  Systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  G I Leontiadis; A Sreedharan; S Dorward; P Barton; B Delaney; C W Howden; M Orhewere; J Gisbert; V K Sharma; A Rostom; P Moayyedi; D Forman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and preventability of adverse drug reactions--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katja M Hakkarainen; Khadidja Hedna; Max Petzold; Staffan Hägg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Anthony J Avery; Sarah Rodgers; Judith A Cantrill; Sarah Armstrong; Kathrin Cresswell; Martin Eden; Rachel A Elliott; Rachel Howard; Denise Kendrick; Caroline J Morris; Robin J Prescott; Glen Swanwick; Matthew Franklin; Koen Putman; Matthew Boyd; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level.

Authors:  Danijela Gnjidic; David G Le Couteur; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Andrew J McLachlan; Rosalie Viney; Sarah N Hilmer; Fiona M Blyth; Grace Joshy; Emily Banks
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Authors:  S Jill Stocks; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Artur Akbarov; Sarah Rodgers; Anthony J Avery; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-11-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Development of a structured clinical pharmacology review for specialist support for management of complex polypharmacy in primary care.

Authors:  Christopher J D Threapleton; James E Kimpton; Iain M Carey; Stephen DeWilde; Derek G Cook; Tess Harris; Emma H Baker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahin Delara; Lauren Murray; Behnaz Jafari; Anees Bahji; Zahra Goodarzi; Julia Kirkham; Mohammad Chowdhury; Dallas P Seitz
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.070

3.  Evaluating the safety of mental health-related prescribing in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Authors:  Wael Y Khawagi; Douglas Steinke; Matthew J Carr; Alison K Wright; Darren M Ashcroft; Anthony Avery; Richard Neil Keers
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 7.418

4.  Potentially inappropriate primary care prescribing in people with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional analysis of a large population cohort.

Authors:  Clare MacRae; Stewart Mercer; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.302

5.  Anticholinergic and sedative drug burden in community-dwelling older people: a national database study.

Authors:  Catherine J Byrne; Caroline Walsh; Caitriona Cahir; Cristín Ryan; David J Williams; Kathleen Bennett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Exploring implementation processes in general practice in a feedback intervention aiming to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing: a qualitative study among general practitioners.

Authors:  Kirsten Høj; Anna Mygind; Flemming Bro
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Detecting and Visualizing Outliers in Provider Profiling Using Funnel Plots and Mixed Effects Models-An Example from Prescription Claims Data.

Authors:  Oliver Hirsch; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Maike Schulz; Michael Erhart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.