Literature DB >> 28700910

Catch Bonds at T Cell Interfaces: Impact of Surface Reorganization and Membrane Fluctuations.

Robert H Pullen1, Steven M Abel2.   

Abstract

Catch bonds are characterized by average lifetimes that initially increase with increasing tensile force. Recently, they have been implicated in T cell activation, where small numbers of antigenic receptor-ligand bonds at a cell-cell interface can stimulate a T cell. Here, we use computational methods to investigate small numbers of bonds at the interface between two membranes. We characterize the time-dependent forces on the bonds in response to changes in the membrane shape and the organization of other surface molecules. We then determine the distributions of bond lifetimes using recent force-dependent lifetime data for T cell receptors bound to various ligands. Strong agonists, which exhibit catch bond behavior, are markedly more likely to remain intact than an antagonist whose average lifetime decreases with increasing force. Thermal fluctuations of the membrane shape enhance the decay of the average force on a bond, but also lead to fluctuations of the force. These fluctuations promote bond rupture, but the effect is buffered by catch bonds. When more than one bond is present, the bonds experience reduced average forces that depend on their relative positions, leading to changes in bond lifetimes. Our results highlight the importance of force-dependent binding kinetics when bonds experience time-dependent and fluctuating forces, as well as potential consequences of collective bond behavior relevant to T cell activation.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28700910      PMCID: PMC5510709          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  46 in total

1.  Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition.

Authors:  S Y Qi; J T Groves; A K Chakraborty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules.

Authors:  Bryan T Marshall; Mian Long; James W Piper; Tadayuki Yago; Rodger P McEver; Cheng Zhu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Shear-dependent 'stick-and-roll' adhesion of type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Wendy E Thomas; Lina M Nilsson; Manu Forero; Evgeni V Sokurenko; Viola Vogel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  The two-pathway model for the catch-slip transition in biological adhesion.

Authors:  Yuriy V Pereverzev; Oleg V Prezhdo; Manu Forero; Evgeni V Sokurenko; Wendy E Thomas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Catch bond-mediated adhesion without a shear threshold: trimannose versus monomannose interactions with the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Lina M Nilsson; Wendy E Thomas; Elena Trintchina; Viola Vogel; Evgeni V Sokurenko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Membrane shape as a reporter for applied forces.

Authors:  Heun Jin Lee; Eric L Peterson; Rob Phillips; William S Klug; Paul A Wiggins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Biophysics of catch bonds.

Authors:  Wendy E Thomas; Viola Vogel; Evgeni Sokurenko
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

8.  The alphabeta T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor.

Authors:  Sun Taek Kim; Koh Takeuchi; Zhen-Yu J Sun; Maki Touma; Carlos E Castro; Amr Fahmy; Matthew J Lang; Gerhard Wagner; Ellis L Reinherz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Calculations show substantial serial engagement of T cell receptors.

Authors:  C Wofsy; D Coombs; B Goldstein
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond.

Authors:  Simon J Davis; P Anton van der Merwe
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 25.606

View more
  11 in total

1.  Nanobody-CD16 Catch Bond Reveals NK Cell Mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Cristina González; Patrick Chames; Brigitte Kerfelec; Daniel Baty; Philippe Robert; Laurent Limozin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Simulation of receptor triggering by kinetic segregation shows role of oligomers and close contacts.

Authors:  Robert Taylor; Jun Allard; Elizabeth L Read
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 3.  Is There a Need for a More Precise Description of Biomolecule Interactions to Understand Cell Function?

Authors:  Pierre Bongrand
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.976

4.  High-Affinity Ligands Can Trigger T Cell Receptor Signaling Without CD45 Segregation.

Authors:  Mohammad Ameen Al-Aghbar; Yeh-Shiu Chu; Bing-Mae Chen; Steve R Roffler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  αβ T Cell Receptor Mechanosensing Forces out Serial Engagement.

Authors:  Yinnian Feng; Ellis L Reinherz; Matthew J Lang
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 16.687

6.  Mechanical feedback enables catch bonds to selectively stabilize scanning microvilli at T-cell surfaces.

Authors:  Robert H Pullen; Steven M Abel
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 7.  The interplay between membrane topology and mechanical forces in regulating T cell receptor activity.

Authors:  Mohammad Ameen Al-Aghbar; Ashwin K Jainarayanan; Michael L Dustin; Steve R Roffler
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-01-11

8.  Isolation of a Structural Mechanism for Uncoupling T Cell Receptor Signaling from Peptide-MHC Binding.

Authors:  Leah V Sibener; Ricardo A Fernandes; Elizabeth M Kolawole; Catherine B Carbone; Fan Liu; Darren McAffee; Michael E Birnbaum; Xinbo Yang; Laura F Su; Wong Yu; Shen Dong; Marvin H Gee; Kevin M Jude; Mark M Davis; Jay T Groves; William A Goddard; James R Heath; Brian D Evavold; Ronald D Vale; K Christopher Garcia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Reveals Distinctions in Key Biophysical Parameters of αβ T-Cell Receptors Compared with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Directed at the Same Ligand.

Authors:  Debasis Banik; Maryam Hamidinia; Joanna Brzostek; Ling Wu; Hannah M Stephens; Paul A MacAry; Ellis L Reinherz; Nicholas R J Gascoigne; Matthew J Lang
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.888

10.  Molecular design of the γδT cell receptor ectodomain encodes biologically fit ligand recognition in the absence of mechanosensing.

Authors:  Robert J Mallis; Jonathan S Duke-Cohan; Dibyendu Kumar Das; Aoi Akitsu; Adrienne M Luoma; Debasis Banik; Hannah M Stephens; Paul W Tetteh; Caitlin D Castro; Sophie Krahnke; Rebecca E Hussey; Brian Lawney; Kristine N Brazin; Pedro A Reche; Wonmuk Hwang; Erin J Adams; Matthew J Lang; Ellis L Reinherz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.