James I Hudson1, Susan L McElroy2,3, M Celeste Ferreira-Cornwell4,5, Jana Radewonuk4,6, Maria Gasior4,7. 1. McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. 2. Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, Ohio. 3. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4. At the time of the study, Shire Development LLC, Lexington, Massachusetts. 5. Now with GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania. 6. Now with The Griesser Group, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. 7. Now with BTG International, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: The ability of pharmacotherapies to prevent relapse and maintain efficacy with long-term treatment in psychiatric conditions is important. Objective: To assess lisdexamfetamine dimesylate maintenance of efficacy in adults with moderate to severe binge-eating disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multinational, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study including 418 participants was conducted at 49 clinical research study sites from January 27, 2014, to April 8, 2015. Eligible adults met DSM-IV-R binge-eating disorder criteria and had moderate to severe binge eating disorder (≥3 binge-eating days per week for 14 days before open-label baseline; Clinical Global Impressions-Severity [CGI-S] scores ≥4 [moderate severity] at screening and open-label baseline). Following a 12-week, open-label phase (dose optimization, 4 weeks [lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, 50 or 70 mg]; dose maintenance, 8 weeks), lisdexamfetamine responders (≤1 binge eating day per week for 4 consecutive weeks and CGI-S scores ≤2 at week 12) were randomized to placebo or continued lisdexamfetamine during a 26-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal phase. Interventions: Lisdexamfetamine administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome variable, time to relapse (≥2 binge-eating days per week for 2 consecutive weeks and ≥2-point CGI-S score increases from randomized withdrawal baseline), was analyzed using a log-rank test (primary analysis); the analysis was stratified for dichotomized 4-week cessation status. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. Results: Of the 418 participants enrolled in the open-label phase of the study, 411 (358 [87.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 38.3 [10.4] years) were included in the safety analysis set. Of 275 randomized lisdexamfetamine responders (placebo, n = 138; lisdexamfetamine, n = 137), the observed proportions of participants meeting relapse criteria were 3.7% (5 of 136) for lisdexamfetamine and 32.1% (42 of 131) for placebo. Lisdexamfetamine demonstrated superiority over placebo on the log-rank test (χ21, 40.37; P < .001) for time to relapse; the hazard ratio, based on a Cox proportional hazards model for lisdexamfetamine vs placebo, was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.04-0.23). The treatment-emergent adverse events observed were generally consistent with the known profile of lisdexamfetamine. Conclusions and Relevance: Risk of binge-eating relapse over 6 months was lower in participants continuing lisdexamfetamine than in those randomized to placebo. The hazard for relapse was lower with lisdexamfetamine than placebo. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02009163.
RCT Entities:
Importance: The ability of pharmacotherapies to prevent relapse and maintain efficacy with long-term treatment in psychiatric conditions is important. Objective: To assess lisdexamfetamine dimesylate maintenance of efficacy in adults with moderate to severe binge-eating disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multinational, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study including 418 participants was conducted at 49 clinical research study sites from January 27, 2014, to April 8, 2015. Eligible adults met DSM-IV-R binge-eating disorder criteria and had moderate to severe binge eating disorder (≥3 binge-eating days per week for 14 days before open-label baseline; Clinical Global Impressions-Severity [CGI-S] scores ≥4 [moderate severity] at screening and open-label baseline). Following a 12-week, open-label phase (dose optimization, 4 weeks [lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, 50 or 70 mg]; dose maintenance, 8 weeks), lisdexamfetamine responders (≤1 binge eating day per week for 4 consecutive weeks and CGI-S scores ≤2 at week 12) were randomized to placebo or continued lisdexamfetamine during a 26-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal phase. Interventions: Lisdexamfetamine administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome variable, time to relapse (≥2 binge-eating days per week for 2 consecutive weeks and ≥2-point CGI-S score increases from randomized withdrawal baseline), was analyzed using a log-rank test (primary analysis); the analysis was stratified for dichotomized 4-week cessation status. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. Results: Of the 418 participants enrolled in the open-label phase of the study, 411 (358 [87.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 38.3 [10.4] years) were included in the safety analysis set. Of 275 randomized lisdexamfetamine responders (placebo, n = 138; lisdexamfetamine, n = 137), the observed proportions of participants meeting relapse criteria were 3.7% (5 of 136) for lisdexamfetamine and 32.1% (42 of 131) for placebo. Lisdexamfetamine demonstrated superiority over placebo on the log-rank test (χ21, 40.37; P < .001) for time to relapse; the hazard ratio, based on a Cox proportional hazards model for lisdexamfetamine vs placebo, was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.04-0.23). The treatment-emergent adverse events observed were generally consistent with the known profile of lisdexamfetamine. Conclusions and Relevance: Risk of binge-eating relapse over 6 months was lower in participants continuing lisdexamfetamine than in those randomized to placebo. The hazard for relapse was lower with lisdexamfetamine than placebo. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02009163.
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James I Hudson; Julie A Capece; Karen Beyers; Alan C Fisher; Norman R Rosenthal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James I Hudson; James E Mitchell; Denise Wilfley; M Celeste Ferreira-Cornwell; Joseph Gao; Jiannong Wang; Timothy Whitaker; Jeffrey Jonas; Maria Gasior Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Kelly Posner; Gregory K Brown; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent; Kseniya V Yershova; Maria A Oquendo; Glenn W Currier; Glenn A Melvin; Laurence Greenhill; Sa Shen; J John Mann Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Susan L McElroy; Anna Guerdjikova; Renu Kotwal; Jeffrey A Welge; Erik B Nelson; Kathleen A Lake; Paul E Keck; James I Hudson Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Susan L McElroy; Nathan A Shapira; Lesley M Arnold; Paul E Keck; Norman R Rosenthal; Shu-Chen Wu; Julie A Capece; Lydia Fazzio; James I Hudson Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Susan L McElroy; Lesley M Arnold; Nathan A Shapira; Paul E Keck; Norman R Rosenthal; M Rezaul Karim; Marc Kamin; James I Hudson Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Catherine McGregor; Manit Srisurapanont; Amanda Mitchell; Marie C Longo; Sharon Cahill; Jason M White Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2007-07-13
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James Hudson; M Celeste Ferreira-Cornwell; Jana Radewonuk; Timothy Whitaker; Maria Gasior Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Derek Blevins; C Jean Choi; Martina Pavlicova; Diana Martinez; John J Mariani; John Grabowski; Frances R Levin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.492