The International Knockout Mouse Consortium was formed in 2007 to inactivate ("knockout") all protein-coding genes in the mouse genome in embryonic stem cells. Production and characterization of these mice, now underway, has generated and phenotyped 3,100 strains with knockout alleles. Skin and adnexa diseases are best defined at the gross clinical level and by histopathology. Representative retired breeders had skin collected from the back, abdomen, eyelids, muzzle, ears, tail, and lower limbs including the nails. To date, 169 novel mutant lines were reviewed and of these, only one was found to have a relatively minor sebaceous gland abnormality associated with follicular dystrophy. The B6N(Cg)-Far2tm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J strain, had lesions affecting sebaceous glands with what appeared to be a secondary follicular dystrophy. A second line, B6N(Cg)-Ppp1r9btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J, had follicular dystrophy limited to many but not all mystacial vibrissae in heterozygous but not homozygous mutant mice, suggesting that this was a nonspecific background lesion. We discuss potential reasons for the low frequency of skin and adnexal phenotypes in mice from this project in comparison to those seen in human Mendelian diseases, and suggest alternative approaches to identification of human disease-relevant models.
The International Knockout Mouse Consortium was formed in 2007 to inactivate ("knockout") all protein-coding genes in the mouse genome in embryonic stem cells. Production and characterization of these mice, now underway, has generated and phenotyped 3,100 strains with knockout alleles. Skin and adnexa diseases are best defined at the gross clinical level and by histopathology. Representative retired breeders had skin collected from the back, abdomen, eyelids, muzzle, ears, tail, and lower limbs including the nails. To date, 169 novel mutant lines were reviewed and of these, only one was found to have a relatively minor sebaceous gland abnormality associated with follicular dystrophy. The B6N(Cg)-Far2tm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J strain, had lesions affecting sebaceous glands with what appeared to be a secondary follicular dystrophy. A second line, B6N(Cg)-Ppp1r9btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J, had follicular dystrophy limited to many but not all mystacial vibrissae in heterozygous but not homozygous mutant mice, suggesting that this was a nonspecific background lesion. We discuss potential reasons for the low frequency of skin and adnexal phenotypes in mice from this project in comparison to those seen in humanMendelian diseases, and suggest alternative approaches to identification of human disease-relevant models.
How many genes are involved in the normal ontogeny and physiology of the skin and its adnexal structures? How do they interact and how are they controlled? These questions, simple to articulate, have complex answers at best, but are predicated on our knowledge of gene function and more importantly the pleiotropic functions of genes, which can only be elucidated though experimentation and particularly through genetic manipulation. Faced with this challenge, we might initially search major databases such as Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI; http://www.informatics.jax.org/), Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (https://www.omim.org/), or Orphanet (http://www.orpha.net/) and ask whether naturally-occurring or genetically engineered mutations show skin and skin-associated phenotypes; this can then be the beginning of a detailed investigation of gene expression, function and control. However, we only have experimentally-derived functional information for about half (11,973) of the protein-coding genes in the mouse as assessed by Gene Ontology annotation (MGI statistics; data accessed 19 Feb 2017) of the estimated 24,211 total, and while there are now many electronically inferred annotations for cellular location, process, and function for many more genes, these are not reliable predictors of the biological process in which genes may be involved. Critically, we have some (in many cases sparse) phenotype information from only 3,710 genes in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (accessed 19 Feb 2017). This is therefore greatly enhanced by gene/phenotype data from genetically variant mouse strains for around 9,493 mouse genes with human orthologs. The consequence of this is that although the mouse provides a great deal more functional information than the human, much of the genome remains biologically featureless, its “dark matter”, and it is only by mutating genes one by one that we can begin to build up a picture of their involvement in processes and structures, and their patterns of functional pleiotropy which are fundamentally unpredictable from sequence alone. An additional problem with mutant mice made in pursuit of hypothesis-driven science is that they are often made on highly variable or undefined genetic backgrounds, often for particular purposes, without systematic or standardized whole animal phenotyping, making it very difficult to compare phenotypes between mutant mice in any uniform way.To address this problem on a large-scale basis, an international consortium was formed in 2007 to inactivate (“knockout”) all protein-coding genes in the mouse genome in embryonic stem cells using multiple gene targeting approaches on a uniform C57BL/6N genetic background [1, 2]. The second phase of this grand plan, the large-scale production and characterization of these mice, is now underway [3, 4]. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium was formed in 2011, composed of 17 Institutes across the world in 11 countries with 5 national funding agencies. This includes the NIH-supported contribution to these efforts, the Knockout Mouse Phenotyping Program, which consists of 3 groups; 1) The Jackson Laboratory, The 2) Baylor College of Medicine, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and MRC Harwell Consortium, and 3) the University of California at Davis, The Toronto Center for Phenogenomics, Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, and Charles River Laboratories Consortium). These consortia have generated over 5,000 strains of live mice using these embryonic stem cell lines and have recently transitioned to using CRISPR/Cas9-induced null alleles. Knockout lines are subjected to detailed, systematic evaluation (phenotyping). A majority of the phenotyping tests performed as part of these programs focus on physiological characterization as their primary goal [5]. While this approach generates an enormous amount of physiological data (clinical pathology, serology/hematology, behavioral data, etc.) [6, 7], histopathology, especially when done by highly trained experts focusing on specific organs, can often make the direct correlation quickly and accurately, as histologic evaluation by pathologists remains the definitive assay in human and veterinary clinical medicine for making most diagnoses [8, 9]. Furthermore, diseases of some organ systems are only truly defined at the gross clinical level followed by histopathology, special stains, and other tissue based tests, such as immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy. The skin, and its adnexa, is one such system.While abnormalities of the skin and adnexa (eccrine glands, pilosebaceous unit, hair shaft, and nails) are easily seen by just looking at the mouse with the naked eye or with magnification (dissection or scanning electron microscope), detailed histopathology is still necessary to accurately define the abnormality in the skin and some lesions are only apparent microscopically. A primary high-throughput phenotyping strategy concentrates on wide coverage of a large number of parameters in a large number of mice and consequently is designed to pick up relatively clear-cut examples of phenodeviance.Prior to the initiation of the current international efforts, both Lexicon and Deltagen undertook large-scale systematic mutagenesis and phenotyping projects, of which Lexicon’s used systematic histopathology as a routine phenotyping tool (see [10] for discussion) and generated histopathological analyses on nearly 5,000 mutant strains. Detailed descriptions of these strains are now in the process of being published in the literature [11, 12].More recently, the Sanger Mouse Genetics Program reported a preliminary general histopathology workup of 50 randomly selected knockout lines yielding 2 with skin phenotypes, using single samples of dorsal skin from two males and two female mice [13]. This was complemented by a “special skin workup” as part of an extended primary phenotyping pipeline [14]. The histopathology protocol involved collecting one piece of dorsal skin, fixing, and processing it routinely to create hematoxylin and eosin stained slides. Nearly 800 mutant mouse skin samples were collected from 562 mutant lines in this high-throughput protocol. One and sometimes two slides with two or three serial sections of dorsal skin from one mouse in the study were provided. Mice were approximately 15 weeks of age. Only 23 lines (4.1%) had some sort of skin phenotype while all the others were normal, implying that many of the genes inactivated had no function in the skin; at least not evident from this screening protocol.The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium database currently (accessed 17 February 2017) shows that overall 2.22% of 3,199 lines show abnormalities of skin morphology and 5.35% of 2,971, abnormalities of the adnexa. This group reported no abnormalities of skin physiology in its database to date. A search of the Europhenome database, which overlaps with the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, shows 12 genes with annotations on skin morphology and physiology (excluding nociception; 27) of 563 genotypes derived from thesemutagenesis efforts (2.1%). The low number of skin phenotypes in these samples contrasts the frequent reporting of skin and adnexal phenotypes both in humanMendelian diseases and in the gathered data of MGI. Detailed examination of the MGI database shows that 1,069 of 9,045 targeted genes with phenotypes are annotated to either skin morphology or phenotypes; approximately 12%. In OMIM, 1,314/3,710 gene entries with phenotypic annotations are annotated to “abnormality of skin, HP:000095” or its children in the Human Phenotype Ontology database (35%) [15]. Assuming that we might expect skin and adnexal phenotypes in both humans and mice to result from loss of function of the same gene, the key question is where are the missing phenotypes? Even considering the exceptionally detailed phenotyping carried out in clinical practice, this is a large discrepancy. One possibility is that in the mouse, loss of function genes involved in the development or function of the skin and adnexa might be embryonic or neonatal lethal. However, this may also be an issue of detection; either through skewed phenotyping (i.e. not focused on the skin or not reported) or failure to detect phenotypes. There are projects associated with the US KnockOut Mouse Program that examine embryonic and perinatal lethality, yet none of them look beyond gross skin phenotype as reasons for early mortality [4]. From the reasoning above, we believe this problem can be addressed through careful targeted skin phenotyping.The Jackson Laboratory is one of three sites in the United States generating knockout mutant mice. Histopathology is an optional parameter in the phenotyping pipeline, and thus is not performed and/or reported universally from individual centers. To better address finding skin lesions, representative retired breeder mice were received, histology was done on skin and nails from multiple sites, and slides were screened by a veterinary pathologist specializing in phenotyping skin mutants. Candidate models were subsequently reviewed by a physician pathologist specializing in dermatopathology. In so doing 169 novel mutant lines were reviewed and of those only one was found to have a relatively minor sebaceous gland abnormality.
Results
Skin, hair follicles, and nail units of both sexes were screened for lesions in 169 novel mutant lines of knockout mice generated at JAX (Table 1). Of these 116 (68.6%) were homozygous and 61 (36.1%) were heterozygous mutant mice. Four lines had both heterozygous and homozygous mice screened (2.4%). Of the heterozygous mice, 62.3% were pre-wean lethal and 11.5% were sub-viable, which is defined as yielding fewer than half of the expected number of homozygotes from an intercross (<12.5%). For these strains no homozygous mutant mice were evaluated. A total of 743 (2.2 average per line and sex) mice were necropsied and the skin and adnexa were evaluated histologically. Nine lines (two females and three males for heterozygotes only and three females and one male for homozygotes only) had only one sex evaluated.
Table 1
KOMP lines evaluated.
Clinical summary of 169 KOMP strains screened for skin, hair, and nail abnormalities.
No.
Strain
JR #
Mutant Allele
No. Mice
Age (days)
Genotype
Skin
Hair Follicle
Seba-ceous Gland
Nail
Prenatal Lethality
Sub-viable
1
B6N(Cg)
24041
4933427D14Riktm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
138/161
HET
B6N(Cg)
24041
4933427D14Riktm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
138/161
HET
2
B6N(Cg)
24902
Acsf2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
218
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24902
Acsf2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
218/222
HOM
3
C57BL/6NJ
25814
Adad1em1J/J
2
272/325
HET
X
C57BL/6NJ
25814
Adad1em1J/J
2
308/337
HET
X
4
C57BL/6NJ
25475
Adad2em1J/J
2
193/199
HET
C57BL/6NJ
25475
Adad2em1J/J
2
196/199
HET
5
B6N(Cg)
18592
Adora2btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
282
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18592
Adora2btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
165/223
HET
6
B6N(Cg)
18561
Ahrrtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
41/138
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18561
Ahrrtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
41/138
HOM
7
B6N(Cg)
25117
Akip1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
183 /189
HOM
B6N(Cg)
25117
Akip1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
183/189
HOM
8
B6N(Cg)
24334
Akr1b8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
125
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24334
Akr1b8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
125
HOM
9
B6N(Cg)
24656
Anapc15tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
125/139
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24656
Anapc15tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
166
HET
X
10
B6N(Cg)
21510
Ap4e1tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
266
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21510
Ap4e1tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
198/359
HOM
11
B6N(Cg)
22304
Arhgef10tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
95
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22304
Arhgef10tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
95/99
HOM
12
B6N(Cg)
18607
Arrdc1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
180/213
HET
B6N(Cg)
18607
Arrdc1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
180
HET
13
B6N(Cg)
18657
Arsktm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
254
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18657
Arsktm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
1
254
HOM
14
B6N(Cg)
18660
Asb10tm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
173
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18660
Asb10tm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
120
HOM
15
B6N(Cg)
22101
Asf1atm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
320/385
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22101
Asf1atm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
362/386
HET
X
16
B6N(Cg)
22305
Atriptm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
340
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22305
Atriptm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
346
HET
X
17
B6N(Cg)
24979
Bbs7tm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/J
2
191/192
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24979
Bbs7tm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/J
2
177/192
HET
X
18
B6N(Cg)
21751
Btg2tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/2J
2
223
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21751
Btg2tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/2J
2
204/352
HOM
19
B6N(Cg)
18653
Bzw2tm1b(KOMP)Mpb/J
2
186
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18653
Bzw2tm1b(KOMP)Mpb/J
2
226
HOM
20
B6N(Cg)
22307
C1qatm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/3J
2
308
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22307
C1qatm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/3J
2
308
HOM
21
B6N(Cg)
18562
C1qtnf5tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
380/472
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18562
C1qtnf5tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
443
HOM
22
B6N(Cg)
22098
C3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
128/219
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22098
C3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
128/225
HOM
23
B6N(Cg)
21282
C9tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
198/206
HET
B6N(Cg)
21282
C9tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
269
HET
24
B6N(Cg)
22418
Cacna2d3tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
239
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22418
Cacna2d3tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
239
HOM
25
B6N(Cg)
23393
Casttm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
111/171
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23393
Casttm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
111/171
HOM
26
B6N(Cg)
18111
Ccd20tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
337/339
HET
X
27
B6N(Cg)
24349
Ccl26tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
216/232/ 251
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24349
Ccl26tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
157
HOM
28
B6N(Cg)
22016
Cd33tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
147/321
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22016
Cd33tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
176/321
HOM
29
B6N(Cg)
22335
Ceacam16tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
100/207/ 227/285
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22335
Ceacam16tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
100/207/ 273/285
HOM
30
B6N(Cg)
18836
Cenpotm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
313/379
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18836
Cenpotm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
354/379
HET
X
31
B6N(Cg)
22819
Cers5tm2b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
206
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22819
Cers5tm2b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
206
HOM
32
B6N(Cg)
18603
Chn1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
244/247
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18603
Chn1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
244/246
HOM
33
B6N(Cg)
25118
Chp2tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
3
149/210/ 211
HET
B6N(Cg)
25118
Chp2tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
210/211
HET
34
B6N(Cg)
23317
Chtf18tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
300
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
23317
Chtf18tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
300
HET
X
35
B6N(Cg)
18631
Cinptm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
126/136
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18631
Cinptm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
131/135/ 136
HET
X
36
B6N(Cg)
18587
Cited4tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
140/183
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18587
Cited4tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
140/183
HOM
37
B6N(Cg)
23666
Cldn19tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
230/324
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23666
Cldn19tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
230/255
HOM
38a
B6N(Cg)
18604
Col18a1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
193/208
HET
B6N(Cg)
18604
Col18a1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
191/208
HET
38b
B6N(Cg)
18604
Col18a1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
322/350
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18604
Col18a1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
322/350
HOM
39
B6N(Cg)
21485
Cptm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
184/326
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21485
Cptm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
271/326
HOM
40
B6N(Cg)
22015
Crymtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
161/198
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22015
Crymtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
161/198
HOM
41
B6N(Cg)
22096
Cyb5d1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
323/354
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22096
Cyb5d1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
355
HOM
42
B6N(Cg)
24035
Cyb5d2tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
203
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24035
Cyb5d2tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
203
HOM
43
B6N(Cg)
22777
Dbf4tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
137/155
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22777
Dbf4tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
178
HET
X
44
B6N(Cg)
27202
Dbn1tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
274
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
27202
Dbn1tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
200/241
HET
X
45
B6N(Cg)
23604
Dcpstm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
249
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
23604
Dcpstm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
258
HET
X
46
B6N(Cg)
18632
Dnajb3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
209/240
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18632
Dnajb3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
202/240
HOM
47
B6N(Cg)
18580
Dnajb7tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
250
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18580
Dnajb7tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
268
HOM
48
B6N(Cg)
18597
Dnajb12tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
156/243
HOM
49
B6N(Cg)
18616
Dnajc5gtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
301
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18616
Dnajc5gtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
164
HOM
50
B6N(Cg)
18637
Dnajc14tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
136/177
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18637
Dnajc14tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
117/177/ 352
HOM
51
B6N(Cg)
18633
Dnajc16tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
122
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18633
Dnajc16tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
122
HET
X
52
B6N(Cg)
21508
Dnase1l2tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
326
HOM
53
B6N(Cg)
26437
Enox1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
239
HET
B6N(Cg)
26437
Enox1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
266
HET
54
B6N(Cg)
23489
Ermp1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
167/201/ 220
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23489
Ermp1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
170/173/ 201
HOM
55
B6N(Cg)
24660
Espnltm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
180
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24660
Espnltm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
145
HOM
56
C57BL/6NJ
25733
Exoc4em1J/J
4
121/123
HET
X
C57BL/6NJ
25733
Exoc4em1J/J
2
121/123
HET
X
57
B6N(Cg)
18622
Exosc8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
379
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18622
Exosc8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
429
HET
X
58
B6N(Cg)
18705
Fam161atm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
209
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18705
Fam161atm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
253/316
HOM
59
B6N(Cg)
22011
Far2tm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
184
HOM
dystrophy
hypo-plasia
B6N(Cg)
22011
Far2tm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
172/184
HOM
dystrophy
hypo-plasia
60
B6N(Cg)
22097
Foxo3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
148
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22097
Foxo3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
226
HOM
61
B6N(Cg)
21486
Ghrtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/3J
2
304/337
HET
B6N(Cg)
21486
Ghrtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/3J
2
304/337
HET
62
B6N(Cg)
19459
Ghrhrtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
1
292
HOM
B6N(Cg)
19459
Ghrhrtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
141
HOM
63
B6N(Cg)
18595
Ghsrtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
143/153/ 370
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18595
Ghsrtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
156/370
HOM
64
B6N(Cg)
18643
Gipc3tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
208
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18643
Gipc3tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
208
HOM
65
B6N(Cg)
18558
Glycam1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
180
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18558
Glycam1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
180
HOM
66
B6N(Cg)
24058
Gnb5tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
174/185
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24058
Gnb5tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
186
HET
X
67
B6N(Cg)
18594
H1fxtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
189
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18594
H1fxtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
186/195
HOM
68
C57BL/6NJ
25319
Heyltm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
215
HOM
C57BL/6NJ
25319
Heyltm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
215
HOM
69
B6N(Cg)
24947
Hfe2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
168/197
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24947
Hfe2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
197/198
HOM
70
B6N(Cg)
24981
Hsf2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/3J
2
172
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24981
Hsf2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/3J
2
172
HOM
71
B6N(Cg)
22782
Hspb1tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
188
HET
72
B6N(Cg)
18619
Hspb2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
262/263/ 386
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18619
Hspb2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
262/263/ 386
HOM
73
B6N(Cg)
18618
Hspb3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
144/199
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18618
Hspb3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
144/199
HOM
74
B6N(Cg)
18617
Htr1atm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
345
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18617
Htr1atm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
137/308
HOM
75
B6N(Cg)
24347
Htr1dtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
165
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24347
Htr1dtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
165/226
HOM
76
B6N(Cg)
18615
Htr3btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
299
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18615
Htr3btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
299
HOM
77
B6N(Cg)
23606
Ift88tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
350
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
23606
Ift88tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
349/350
HET
X
78a
B6N(Cg)
21516
Igsf11tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
1
297
HET
B6N(Cg)
21516
Igsf11tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
3
287/300
HET
78b
B6N(Cg)
21516
Igsf11tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
280/351
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21516
Igsf11tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
280
HOM
79
B6N(Cg)
22303
Il12rb2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
168/206/ 264
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22303
Il12rb2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
168/206
HOM
80
B6N(Cg)
22005
Il24tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
4
64/165/194/214
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22005
Il24tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
4
64/165/194/214
HOM
81
B6N(Cg)
22388
Il6sttm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
180/210
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22388
Il6sttm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
210
HOM
82
B6N(Cg)
18655
Irf8tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
195
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18655
Irf8tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
171/195
HOM
83
B6N(Cg)
24055
Jam2tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
140
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24055
Jam2tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
140
HOM
84
B6N(Cg)
26066
Jmjd8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
269
HOM
B6N(Cg)
26066
Jmjd8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
269
HOM
85
B6N(Cg)
22821
Juptm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
109/143
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22821
Juptm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
107/143
HET
X
86
B6N(Cg)
21140
Kcnh3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
1
186
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21140
Kcnh3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
186/288
HOM
87
B6N(Cg)
23603
Kif1btm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
319
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
23603
Kif1btm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
322
HET
X
88
B6N(Cg)
22085
Kif26btm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
323/446
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22085
Kif26btm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
327/446
HET
X
89
B6N(Cg)
25381
Klk14tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
115/161
HOM
B6N(Cg)
25381
Klk14tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
115/152
HOM
90
B6N(Cg)
23318
Krt17tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
297/304
HET
B6N(Cg)
23318
Krt17tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/2J
2
297/304
HET
91
B6N(Cg)
25383
Krt9tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
210
HOM
B6N(Cg)
25383
Krt9tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
210
HOM
92
B6N(Cg)
25518
Lipntm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
188/189/ 195
HOM
93
B6N(Cg)
18563
Loxl1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
112/133/ 147
HET
B6N(Cg)
18563
Loxl1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
110
HET
94
B6N(Cg)
22094
Lpar6tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
172/226
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22094
Lpar6tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
172/213
HOM
95
B6N(Cg)
23021
Lrrc15tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
1
183
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23021
Lrrc15tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
1
48
HOM
96
B6N(Cg)
23024
Mdktm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
193
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23024
Mdktm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
193
HOM
97a
B6N(Cg)
22092
Mmp8tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
213
HET
97b
B6N(Cg)
22092
Mmp8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
232/273
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22092
Mmp8tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
245/273
HOM
98
B6N(Cg)
18635
Mrps25tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
303
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18635
Mrps25tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
303/364
HET
X
99
B6N(Cg)
24673
Myo7btm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
237/240
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24673
Myo7btm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
236/237
HOM
100
B6N(Cg)
23599
Nat1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
142/152
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23599
Nat1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
142/157
HOM
101
B6N(Cg)
18575
Ncaldtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
230/315
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18575
Ncaldtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
230/310/ 408
HOM
102
B6N(Cg)
18577
Nefhtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
230
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18577
Nefhtm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
230
HOM
103
B6N(Cg)
18697
Nemftm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
78
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18697
Nemftm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
78
HET
X
104
B6N(Cg)
24185
Nestm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
139/140
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24185
Nestm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
162/170
HOM
105
B6N(Cg)
18638
Nmrk2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
172/177
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18638
Nmrk2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
177/180
HOM
106
B6N(Cg)
18645
Nrcamtm2e.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
242/275
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18645
Nrcamtm2e.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
242/275
HOM
107
B6N(Cg)
24899
Nsun7tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
183/190
HET
B6N(Cg)
24899
Nsun7tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
183
HET
108
B6N(Cg)
24233
Nxntm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/J
2
232/236
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24233
Nxntm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/J
2
236
HET
X
109
B6N(Cg)
24036
Orc1tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
185
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24036
Orc1tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
185/206
HET
X
110
B6N(Cg)
22338
Osmtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
198/270/ 358/376
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22338
Osmtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
198/270/ 358
HOM
111
B6N(Cg)
23058
Parp8tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
202
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23058
Parp8tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
202
HOM
112
B6N(Cg)
21613
Parp16tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/2J
2
288
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21613
Parp16tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/2J
2
265
HOM
113
B6N(Cg)
22341
Pcsk5tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
306/321
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22341
Pcsk5tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
346
HET
X
114
B6N(Cg)
24330
Pnmttm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
120/140/ 152/182
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24330
Pnmttm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
140/182
HOM
115a
B6N(Cg)
18609
Ppp1r9btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
139/282
HET
vibrissa
B6N(Cg)
18609
Ppp1r9btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
139/330
HET
vibrissa
115b
B6N(Cg)
18609
Ppp1r9btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
321
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18609
Ppp1r9btm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
114/137
HOM
116
B6N(Cg)
22099
Preptm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
328/350
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22099
Preptm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
350
HET
X
117a
B6N(Cg)
18576
Prom2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
89
HET
B6N(Cg)
18576
Prom2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
89
HET
117b
B6N(Cg)
18576
Prom2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
403
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18576
Prom2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
437
HOM
118
B6N(Cg)
24025
Psen1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
225/240
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24025
Psen1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
240
HET
X
119
B6N(Cg)
23667
Pycr1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
165/251
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23667
Pycr1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
165/251
HOM
120
B6N(Cg)
22387
Rab5atm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
222/230
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22387
Rab5atm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
222/227/ 230
HOM
121
B6N(Cg)
22389
Rab24tm1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
179
HET
B6N(Cg)
22389
Rab24tm1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
243
HET
122
B6N(Cg)
23422
Rab27btm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
127/129
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23422
Rab27btm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
133/159
HOM
123
B6N(Cg)
24188
Rab34tm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
328
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24188
Rab34tm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
328
HET
X
124
B6N(Cg)
23664
Rab36tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
96/255
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23664
Rab36tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
96/255
HOM
125
B6N(Cg)
23059
Rab43tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
130
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23059
Rab43tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
130
HOM
126
B6N(Cg)
26882
Rabac1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
118
HOM
B6N(Cg)
26882
Rabac1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
118
HOM
127
B6N(Cg)
25849
Rbpjtm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
298
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
25849
Rbpjtm1b(EUCOMM)Hmgu/J
2
255
HET
X
128
B6N(Cg)
18572
Resp18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
231
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18572
Resp18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
231
HOM
129
B6N(Cg)
24674
Rhbdl2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
138
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24674
Rhbdl2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
138
HOM
130
B6N(Cg)
21750
Rilpl2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
150/198/ 287
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21750
Rilpl2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
242/287/ 295
HOM
131
B6N(Cg)
21511
Rnf10tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
222
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21511
Rnf10tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
228
HOM
132
B6N(Cg)
26493
Rps6kl1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
242
HOM
B6N(Cg)
26493
Rsp6kl1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
242
HOM
133
B6N(Cg)
23136
Sdhatm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
343/393
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
23136
Sdhatm2b(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
393/396
HET
X
134
B6N(Cg)
24038
Sgtatm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
250/254
HET
B6N(Cg)
24038
Sgtatm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
250
HET
135
B6N(Cg)
21142
Sh3tc2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
221
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21142
Sh3tc2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
1
227
HOM
136
B6N(Cg)
23511
Ska2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
228
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
23511
Ska2tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
231
HET
X
137
B6N(Cg)
23414
Slc25a35tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
179
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23414
Slc25a35tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
179
HOM
138a
B6N(Cg)
22780
Sorbs2tm1(KOMP)Mbp/J
1
86
HET
B6N(Cg)
22780
Sorbs2tm1(KOMP)Mbp/J
3
86/199
HET
138b
B6N(Cg)
22780
Sorbs2tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
1
159
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22780
Sorbs2tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
159/160
HOM
139
B6N(Cg)
23020
Sox18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
178/226
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23020
Sox18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
161/165
HOM
140
B6N(Cg)
26095
Spag4tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
161
HOM
B6N(Cg)
26095
Spag4tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
1
59
HOM
141
B6N(Cg)
18820
Sptssatm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
287/292
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18820
Sptssatm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
327
HET
X
142
B6N(Cg)
24184
Srd5a3tm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/J
2
258/265
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24184
Srd5a3tm1b(EUCOMM)Wtsi/J
2
265
HET
X
143
B6N(Cg)
21115
Stag3tm1e.1(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
1
234
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21115
Stag3tm1e.1(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
104/275
HOM
144
B6N(Cg)
18611
Stk16tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
105
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
18611
Stk16tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
66/105
HET
X
145
B6N(Cg)
18611
Stk16tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
39
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18611
Stk16tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
39
HOM
146
B6N(Cg)
22781
Stx16tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
1
301
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22781
Stx16tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
301/320
HOM
147
B6N(Cg)
22784
Sycp3tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
110
HET
B6N(Cg)
22784
Sycp3tm1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
183
HET
148
B6N(Cg)
22784
Sycp3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
197/214/ 274/279
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22784
Sycp3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
165/202/ 274
HOM
149
B6N(Cg)
23665
Syn3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
267/270
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23665
Syn3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
267/270
HOM
150
B6.129S1
24694
Tgm2tm1Rmgr/J
2
230/234
HOM
B6.129S1
24694
Tgm2tm1Rmgr/J
2
203/234
HOM
151
B6N(Cg)
24406
Timm22tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
181/192
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24406
Timm22tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
193
HET
X
152
B6N(Cg)
18639
Timp3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
210/278/ 292
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18639
Timp3tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
210
HOM
153
B6N(Cg)
18629
Tmem136tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
254/274
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18629
Tmem136tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
187/274
HOM
154
B6N(Cg)
23060
Tmem151btm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
219/221/ 288
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23060
Tmem151btm1b(KOMP)Wtsi/J
4
202/288
HOM
155
B6N(Cg)
26542
Tpcn1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
3
174
HOM
B6N(Cg)
26542
Tpcn1tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
174
HOM
156
B6N(Cg)
21752
Tpgs2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
156
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21752
Tpgs2tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
156
HOM
157
B6N(Cg)
18606
Tprntm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
270
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18606
Tprntm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
141/293
HOM
158
B6N(Cg)
18553
Trip13tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
181/196/ 239
HOM
B6N(Cg)
18533
Trip13tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
41/181/321
HOM
159
B6N(Cg)
21483
Tspan18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
263
HOM
B6N(Cg)
21483
Tspan18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
263
HOM
160
C57BL/6NJ
26909
Ttll10em1J/J
2
200/229
HOM
C57BL/6NJ
26909
Ttll10em1J/J
2
196/229
HOM
161
B6N(Cg)
22817
Ube2ctm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
249/270
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
22817
Ube2ctm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/J
2
287
HET
X
162
B6N(Cg)
24027
Ube2mtm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
484
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24027
Ube2mtm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi/2J
2
484
HET
X
163
B6N(Cg)
23019
Vsig8tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
1
116
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23019
Vsig8tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
1
44
HOM
164
B6N(Cg)
23660
Zbtb4tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
267
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23660
Zbtb4tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
144/267
HOM
165
B6N(Cg)
18620
Zdhhc11tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
4
127
HET
166
B6N(Cg)
24091
Zfp346tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
194/202
HET
X
B6N(Cg)
24091
Zfp346tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
194/219
HET
X
167
B6N(Cg)
23023
Zfp42tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
151
HOM
B6N(Cg)
23023
Zfp42tm1b(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
145
HOM
168
B6N(Cg)
24057
Zfp961tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
179/226
HOM
B6N(Cg)
24057
Zfp961tm1.1(KOMP)Mbp/J
2
179/226
HOM
169a
C57BL/6NJ
22366
Zzef1tm2(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
198/206
HET
C57BL/6NJ
22366
Zzef1tm2(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
269
HET
169b
B6N(Cg)
22366
Zzef1tm2.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
1
103
HOM
B6N(Cg)
22366
Zzef1tm2.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J
2
95/352
HOM
Females
Males
Strain not listed as B6N(Cg)
HET
Heterozygous mutant mice
HOM
Homozygous mutant mice
Normal skin and adnexa
Lesion in skin or adnexa
X
Prenatal lethal or subviable phenotype
Clinically normal phenotype
KOMP lines evaluated.
Clinical summary of 169 KOMP strains screened for skin, hair, and nail abnormalities.Nonspecific, sporadic lesions were found in many of the mice in this study. Most commonly these were ruptured hair follicles with hair shaft fragments free in the dermis or hypodermal fat layer surrounded by a variety of inflammatory cell types, usually neutrophils around the hair shaft and a layer of macrophages (trichogranuloma, Fig 1). These were often solitary and not consistently found in all the mice within a mutant line, which was a primary criterion to differentiate these lesions from gene mutation associated phenotypes. Other mice had follicular dystrophy consistent with C57BL/6 alopecia and dermatitis, a low frequency, strain-specific skin disease resembling human central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia [16].
Fig 1
Incidental lesions were found scattered throughout the skin samples in many lines.
Incidental lesions were not consistently found in all mice of a line. Lesions included solitary tail skin hair follicle with infundibular plugging (A-C). Truncal hair follicle infundibular plugging, rupture below the level of the sebaceous gland, follicle filled with neutrophils and surrounded by neutrophils and macrophages (D-F). Sporadic skin lesions found in many mice examined included isolated, one or two, ruptured hair follicles in the dermis where the free hair shaft fragments were engulfed by granulomas and surrounded by neutrophils (G-I). Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.
Incidental lesions were found scattered throughout the skin samples in many lines.
Incidental lesions were not consistently found in all mice of a line. Lesions included solitary tail skin hair follicle with infundibular plugging (A-C). Truncal hair follicle infundibular plugging, rupture below the level of the sebaceous gland, follicle filled with neutrophils and surrounded by neutrophils and macrophages (D-F). Sporadic skin lesions found in many mice examined included isolated, one or two, ruptured hair follicles in the dermis where the free hair shaft fragments were engulfed by granulomas and surrounded by neutrophils (G-I). Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.Mice with null mutations in their fatty acyl CoA reductase 2 (Far2/2J) gene were found to consistently develop focal alopecia as adults on the dorsal skin extending distally from the base of the ears (Fig 2). Histologically, in areas where the skin appeared to be relatively normal there were minor lesions affecting the pilosebaceous and Meibomian (eyelids) glands that could be easily over-looked. Other modified sebaceous glands (Zymbal, clitoral, or preputial glands) were not examined in this study. The sebaceous glands superficially appeared to be normal but within the sebaceous duct the sebocytes became brightly eosinophilic and, when these holocrine cells ruptured, their secretion remained present and clumped. By contrast, normal sebocytes were slightly basophilic with fine, uniformly sized vacuoles in their cytoplasm. When the normal cells ruptured there was no evidence of their cytoplasmic content within the follicular infundibulum or on the skin surface (Fig 3). In areas of alopecia, the epidermis was mildly acanthotic with orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis associated with areas of follicular dystrophy and rupture and an associated foreign body inflammatory response that would lead to follicular scarring, a form of cicatricial alopecia (Fig 4). Skin surface lipidomic and time course studies are in progress to better define these changes. Further, non-integument phenotypes affecting lipid metabolism, behavior, immunity, and the cardiovascular system have been reported for this strain, and can be found on the IMPC database website (http://www.mousephenotype.org/data/genes/MGI:2687035#section-associations).
Fig 2
A B6N(Cg)-Far2/2J mutant (left) and wildtype (right) mouse.
Both are 15 week old females. Note the alopecia extending distally from the base of the ears.
Fig 3
Sebaceous gland changes in fatty acyl CoA reductase 2 mutant mice.
Most late stage anagen hair follicles in B6N(Cg)-Far2/2J mutant mice, as in this 184 day old male, were relatively normal and produced a normal hair shaft (A). However, the sebaceous glands were mildly hypoplastic with brightly eosinophilic mature sebocytes that did not immediately rupture as they entered the infundibulum (C). As in other mouse mutations that cause hypoplasia of sebaceous glands, the hair shafts in these mice did not exit the follicular ostium resulting in perforation of the root sheaths, release of the hair shaft into the dermis, and an inflammatory reaction (B). This healed by follicular scarring, or cicatricial alopecia. By contrast, aged and sex matched B6N(Cg) controls rarely exhibited ruptured follicles (D). Sebaceous glands varied in size with the hair cycle, which was normal, and sebocytes had light pink cytoplasm that becomes very pale as the cells matured and abruptly ruptured into the duct. (E). Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.
Fig 4
Follicular dystrophy in fatty acyl CoA reductase 2 mutant mice.
In areas of alopecia, the B6N(Cg)- Far2/2J mutant skin was mildly acanthotic and orthokeratotic, most likely secondary to the abnormal secretions of the sebaceous glands. The infundibulum was mildly dilated (A, B). Follicles with follicular dystrophy (C, D) and with pigment cast (E) were identified occasionally to frequently. Such ruptured follicles with granulomatous inflammation eventually lead to follicular scarring, a form of cicatricial alopecia. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.
A B6N(Cg)-Far2/2J mutant (left) and wildtype (right) mouse.
Both are 15 week old females. Note the alopecia extending distally from the base of the ears.
Sebaceous gland changes in fatty acyl CoA reductase 2 mutant mice.
Most late stage anagen hair follicles in B6N(Cg)-Far2/2J mutant mice, as in this 184 day old male, were relatively normal and produced a normal hair shaft (A). However, the sebaceous glands were mildly hypoplastic with brightly eosinophilic mature sebocytes that did not immediately rupture as they entered the infundibulum (C). As in other mouse mutations that cause hypoplasia of sebaceous glands, the hair shafts in these mice did not exit the follicular ostium resulting in perforation of the root sheaths, release of the hair shaft into the dermis, and an inflammatory reaction (B). This healed by follicular scarring, or cicatricial alopecia. By contrast, aged and sex matched B6N(Cg) controls rarely exhibited ruptured follicles (D). Sebaceous glands varied in size with the hair cycle, which was normal, and sebocytes had light pink cytoplasm that becomes very pale as the cells matured and abruptly ruptured into the duct. (E). Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.
Follicular dystrophy in fatty acyl CoA reductase 2 mutant mice.
In areas of alopecia, the B6N(Cg)- Far2/2J mutant skin was mildly acanthotic and orthokeratotic, most likely secondary to the abnormal secretions of the sebaceous glands. The infundibulum was mildly dilated (A, B). Follicles with follicular dystrophy (C, D) and with pigment cast (E) were identified occasionally to frequently. Such ruptured follicles with granulomatous inflammation eventually lead to follicular scarring, a form of cicatricial alopecia. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.Heterozygous mutant mice for the protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 9B (Ppp1r9b/J) gene had between one and five vibrissae hair shafts undergoing degenerative changes (follicular dystrophy) in each of three females and two males examined. Each section contained 10–15 vibrissae follicles (Fig 5). Only mystacial vibrissae were affected, not the periorbital or lower leg vibrissae. No other hair types were affected. This change was not found in two female and two male homozygous mutants suggesting that this was a nonspecific background lesion, as vibrissae follicular dystrophy was also seen occasionally in many mouse lines but only in one or two follicles and not consistently in all vibrissae in any section.
Fig 5
Vibrissae dystrophy in some protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 9B mice.
B6N(Cg)-Ppp1r9b/J, had follicular dystrophy limited to many but not all mystacial vibrissae in heterozygous but not homozygous mutant mice suggesting this is an incidental, albeit relatively frequent lesion. Boxed areas are enlarged as indicated by the arrows. Pigment casts are identified in all dystrophic hair follicles (B, F, and H). Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.
Vibrissae dystrophy in some protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 9B mice.
B6N(Cg)-Ppp1r9b/J, had follicular dystrophy limited to many but not all mystacial vibrissae in heterozygous but not homozygous mutant mice suggesting this is an incidental, albeit relatively frequent lesion. Boxed areas are enlarged as indicated by the arrows. Pigment casts are identified in all dystrophic hair follicles (B, F, and H). Hematoxylin and eosin stain, bar size indicated in each figure.The skin and nail sections from almost all of the mice in these studies were clinically and histologically normal.
Discussion
We have investigated the apparent deficiency of skin and adnexal phenotypes in a random set of strains from a systematic, genome-wide, knockout study using histopathological phenotyping. We report here that numbers detected confirm an earlier study [14] which also showed low numbers of detectable skin phenotypes, suggesting that ascertainment is not the cause of the “missing phenotypes”.Of over 100 homozygous mutants screened, only one line, Far2/2J, had lesions affecting sebaceous glands with what appeared to be a secondary follicular dystrophy, which probably progresses to a form of cicatricial alopecia as seen with a number of other mouse mutations with abnormalities of the sebaceous glands [17]. A rare autosomal recessive neurological disease without hair abnormalities was reported for humans with mutations in FAR1 [18]. While the biochemistry of these two proteins, FAR1 and FAR2, is known no disease is currently associated with mutations in FAR2 in humans (http://omim.org/entry/616156?search=Far2&highlight=far2). However, Far2 transcripts were reported in the eyelid and skin, presumably localized in the Meibomian and sebaceous glands, respectively [19]. Information obtained from phenotyping these mice will be useful to help assess sebaceous gland abnormalities in humans as not all genes that are expressed in sebaceous glands result in sebaceous gland abnormalities or clinically obvious hair problems, such as mouse null mutations in Soat1 [20, 21]. Detailed studies are in progress to define that pathogenesis of the follicular dystrophy and to match it with a specific human disease in these Far2 mutant mice.A second line, Ppp1r9b/J, had follicular dystrophy limited to many but not all vibrissae in heterozygous but not homozygous mutant mice suggesting this was a nonspecific background problem. A targeted mutant mouse line made for this gene (Ppp1r9b) was reported to only have neurological abnormalities [22, 23]. As the vibrissae are an important somatosensory organ in the mouse [24] this structure should be carefully evaluated in such phenotyping studies.The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium has provided a unique, internally consistent dataset with genome-wide coverage and has yielded a great deal of valuable information on gene function. At the outset anticipation was high that systematic creation of null mice for all known protein coding genes would yield large amounts of information on the pathobiology of human disease. The high frequency of embryonic and neonatal lethal lines [4], consistent with previous estimates [6], was not a surprise, but potentially limits the value of these mice for detailed investigation of adult phenotypes and diseases which will require carefully designed conditional strategies.The relatively low frequency of skin phenotypes in the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium mice found in this and an earlier study [11] was surprising given the frequency expected from global surveys of MGI and OMIM discussed above. The histopathological survey presented here was very detailed focusing on the skin, and we believe this supports the assertion that the “missing phenotypes” are not due to lack of ascertainment, at least in the random sample selected. The remaining possibilities are that genes involved in skin morphogenesis and physiology are overrepresented in those essential for embryogenesis, the C57BL6N background is failing to show phenotypes, or that the complete removal of gene function in the mouse knockouts have more severe functional consequences than the point mutations, regulatory lesions, and insertions/deletions (indels) that constitute most disease-causing mutations in humans. Protein truncating variants which provide the greatest likelihood of complete functional loss (“knockouts”) are very rare in the human population [25].In the current study, 74% of the heterozygous lines were pre-wean lethal or sub-viable as homozygotes (that were not examined) presenting the possibility that mutants having skin phenotypes might also be embryonic essential genes. While it is possible to argue that essential genes should never show up as disease genes in a population due to negative selection, there is increasing evidence that essential genes are often ‘disease genes”–i.e. carry mutations that are associated with abnormal or disease phenotypes. This is by no means a settled conclusion however. The relationship between gene essentiality and disease association is discussed in detail in Cooper et al. [25].Studies conducted around a decade ago, based on a limited gene set, suggested that mouse genes that are essential—i.e., genes related to more severe phenotypes in mouse, are more likely to be human disease genes, but that embryonic lethals were less likely [26]. However, a more recent study strongly suggested that about 30% of human disease genes (from OMIM) have a mouse ortholog with a lethal knockout phenotype (673/1965) [27]. The discrepancies here reflect to an extent the methodology used to calculate the association and the inclusion or exclusion of genes with no phenotypic data in the study by Park et al. [26]. This association will certainly stand further scrutiny now that more data are available, but does not explain why the IMPC/KOMP strains show fewer skin phenotypes than the bulk of the loss-of-function allele carrying strains in MGI. Core analysis carried out on Ingenuity™ using the lists of lethal essential genes from supplementary table 3 of Dickinson et al. [4] shows no significant enrichment of annotations to dermatological disease or skin development, mitigating against the possibility that genes associated with skin disease are overrepresented in the essential segment of the genome. A working conclusion, therefore, is that either there is a problem with the strain background in this resource showing full expressivity of mutations affecting the skin, or that we have so far insufficient coverage of the genome using high-resolution phenotyping to account for the “missing phenotypes” from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium program. Of concern is the observation that most human disease associated mutations are hypomorphic alleles which, in the event of lethal homozygosity of complete KOs, are much more likely to present a phenotype compatible with survival. The potential for missing these with a complete loss of function strategy is significant, especially when examining completely novel genes where there are no existing experimental or inferred annotations. The power of looking for skin phenotypes using a strategy such as that developed by Beutler et al. [28] using ENU mutagenesis is very persuasive. Currently Mutagenetix (https://mutagenetix.utsouthwestern.edu/home.cfm), accessed 1 Mar 2017) shows 49 genes with skin associated phenotypes recovered as phenotypic mutations from a total of 262 phenotyped genes (119 of 498 mapped mutations) and should be considered in the future along with full characterization of spontaneous and ENU generated mutations in large collections.
Materials and methods
Generation of mutant mice
Embryonic stem cell lines
Initially mice included in the program were produced from embryonic stem cell lines acquired from repositories (https://www.komp.org/ or http://www.eummcr.org/). These resources comprised two major allele types, the Velocigene “definitive null” allele produced by the Regeneron Corporation (Vlcg) [1] and the “knockout first, conditional ready” design produced by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Centre and partners (Sanger) [2]. The Vlcg alleles delete the entire coding sequence of the target gene, including all introns, while inserting a LacZ reporter cassette. The neo resistance cassette is flanked by loxP sites for removal by cre-recombinase. The Sanger allele is a multifunctional design. In its native form, the strong splice acceptor typically generates a null allele. When bred to Flp-expressing mice, the entire 5’ LacZ and neo cassette are removed leaving a loxP-flanked critical exon for conditional mutagenesis. When bred to cre-recombinase transgenic mice, this allele is converted into a “definitive null” which retains the 5’ LacZ cassette and removes the critical exon and neo marker.All animal work was approved by The Jackson Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee (approval number 07005 "Mouse Models for Dermatology Research”).
Generating live mice
Following importation at The Jackson Laboratory, clones are injected into blastocyst hosts and resulting chimeras are bred to C57BL/6NJ (STOCK#5304) or C57BL/6NJ-Tyr/GrsrJ (STOCK#21999; to select for coat color transmission) inbred mice (see Table 1) to assure isogenicity of the resource. Germline transmitting (GLT) clones are quality confirmed (both Vlcg and Sanger) for targeting. Following GLT, mice are bred to congenic cre-recombinase transgenic mice (B6N.Cg-Tg(Sox2-cre)1Amc/J; STOCK#14094) to remove the neo cassette and to generate a definitive null allele, generating the tm1.1 allele (Vlcg and non-conditional Sanger clones) and tm1b allele (from conditional-ready Sanger clones). Four lines were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis, using standard approaches [29] to generate small deletions in the early part of the transcript. These mice are expanded, quality control-confirmed, and intercrossed to generate knockout mice. Approximately 30% of lines display lethality or sub-lethality (defined as yielding less than 12.5% homozygous mice) [4]. For these strains, heterozygous mice were phenotyped. For other strains, homozygous breeder pairs established for colony maintenance used in this study when they became retired breeders to maximize chances of finding adult onset diseases.
Systematic analysis of mutant mice
Animal logistics
Two female and two male retired breeder mice were provided from The Jackson Laboratory knockout mouse production program (Table 1). Homozygous lethal embryos and perinatal lethal mouse lines were specifically excluded from these studies. In these cases, heterozygous animals were aged and evaluated. All lines, whether Vlcg definitive null or Sanger conditional-ready mice were evaluated post-cre excision, which removed the neo cassette and heterologous promoter and in the case of Sanger alleles also removing the critical exon to create a definitive null allele (Vlcg tm1.1 and Sanger tm1b). All mice had skin, hair, and nails collected (see below).
Necropsy procedures, slide generation, and histopathologic analyses
As the skin is anatomically and molecularly distinct throughout the body in both mice and humans [30, 31] and diseases can be restricted to specific anatomic sites, skin was collected from several areas. As dorsal and ventral trunk skin are histologically similar in the mouse, they were collected with other anatomically identifiable tissues and put into respective cassettes: 1) dorsal skin and ear skin; 2) ventral skin, eyelid skin, muzzle skin; 3) digits to include the foot pads and nail unit; and 4) cross and longitudinal sections of the tail. This allows for evaluation of all major hair follicle types, mucocutaneous junctions, the nail unit, as well as the footpad (including eccrine glands) [32]. Detailed protocols on skin removal, orientation, and processing are described elsewhere [33]. Tissues were fixed in Fekete’s acid-alcohol-formalin solution. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for routine screening.
Authors: J P Sundberg; D Taylor; G Lorch; J Miller; K A Silva; B A Sundberg; D Roopenian; L Sperling; D Ong; L E King; H Everts Journal: Vet Pathol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 2.221
Authors: Wenning Qin; Peter M Kutny; Richard S Maser; Stephanie L Dion; Jeffrey D Lamont; Yingfan Zhang; Greggory A Perry; Haoyi Wang Journal: Curr Protoc Mouse Biol Date: 2016-03-01
Authors: Paul N Schofield; Pierre Dubus; Laurence Klein; Mark Moore; Colin McKerlie; Jerrold M Ward; John P Sundberg Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Baojin Wu; Christopher S Potter; Kathleen A Silva; Yanhua Liang; Laura G Reinholdt; Lydia M Alley; Lucy B Rowe; Derry C Roopenian; Alexander Awgulewitsch; John P Sundberg Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: J Feng; Z Yan; A Ferreira; K Tomizawa; J A Liauw; M Zhuo; P B Allen; C C Ouimet; P Greengard Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: K A Giehl; C S Potter; B Wu; K A Silva; L B Rowe; A Awgulewitsch; J P Sundberg Journal: Clin Exp Dermatol Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 3.470
Authors: John P Sundberg; Timothy M Stearns; Joongho Joh; Mary Proctor; Arvind Ingle; Kathleen A Silva; Soheil S Dadras; A Bennett Jenson; Shin-je Ghim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sebastian Köhler; Nicole A Vasilevsky; Mark Engelstad; Erin Foster; Julie McMurry; Ségolène Aymé; Gareth Baynam; Susan M Bello; Cornelius F Boerkoel; Kym M Boycott; Michael Brudno; Orion J Buske; Patrick F Chinnery; Valentina Cipriani; Laureen E Connell; Hugh J S Dawkins; Laura E DeMare; Andrew D Devereau; Bert B A de Vries; Helen V Firth; Kathleen Freson; Daniel Greene; Ada Hamosh; Ingo Helbig; Courtney Hum; Johanna A Jähn; Roger James; Roland Krause; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Hanns Lochmüller; Gholson J Lyon; Soichi Ogishima; Annie Olry; Willem H Ouwehand; Nikolas Pontikos; Ana Rath; Franz Schaefer; Richard H Scott; Michael Segal; Panagiotis I Sergouniotis; Richard Sever; Cynthia L Smith; Volker Straub; Rachel Thompson; Catherine Turner; Ernest Turro; Marijcke W M Veltman; Tom Vulliamy; Jing Yu; Julie von Ziegenweidt; Andreas Zankl; Stephan Züchner; Tomasz Zemojtel; Julius O B Jacobsen; Tudor Groza; Damian Smedley; Christopher J Mungall; Melissa Haendel; Peter N Robinson Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jacqueline K White; Anna-Karin Gerdin; Natasha A Karp; Ed Ryder; Marija Buljan; James N Bussell; Jennifer Salisbury; Simon Clare; Neil J Ingham; Christine Podrini; Richard Houghton; Jeanne Estabel; Joanna R Bottomley; David G Melvin; David Sunter; Niels C Adams; David Tannahill; Darren W Logan; Daniel G Macarthur; Jonathan Flint; Vinit B Mahajan; Stephen H Tsang; Ian Smyth; Fiona M Watt; William C Skarnes; Gordon Dougan; David J Adams; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Allan Bradley; Karen P Steel Journal: Cell Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Mary E Dickinson; Ann M Flenniken; Xiao Ji; Lydia Teboul; Michael D Wong; Jacqueline K White; Terrence F Meehan; Wolfgang J Weninger; Henrik Westerberg; Hibret Adissu; Candice N Baker; Lynette Bower; James M Brown; L Brianna Caddle; Francesco Chiani; Dave Clary; James Cleak; Mark J Daly; James M Denegre; Brendan Doe; Mary E Dolan; Sarah M Edie; Helmut Fuchs; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Antonella Galli; Alessia Gambadoro; Juan Gallegos; Shiying Guo; Neil R Horner; Chih-Wei Hsu; Sara J Johnson; Sowmya Kalaga; Lance C Keith; Louise Lanoue; Thomas N Lawson; Monkol Lek; Manuel Mark; Susan Marschall; Jeremy Mason; Melissa L McElwee; Susan Newbigging; Lauryl M J Nutter; Kevin A Peterson; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Douglas J Rowland; Edward Ryder; Kaitlin E Samocha; John R Seavitt; Mohammed Selloum; Zsombor Szoke-Kovacs; Masaru Tamura; Amanda G Trainor; Ilinca Tudose; Shigeharu Wakana; Jonathan Warren; Olivia Wendling; David B West; Leeyean Wong; Atsushi Yoshiki; Daniel G MacArthur; Glauco P Tocchini-Valentini; Xiang Gao; Paul Flicek; Allan Bradley; William C Skarnes; Monica J Justice; Helen E Parkinson; Mark Moore; Sara Wells; Robert E Braun; Karen L Svenson; Martin Hrabe de Angelis; Yann Herault; Tim Mohun; Ann-Marie Mallon; R Mark Henkelman; Steve D M Brown; David J Adams; K C Kent Lloyd; Colin McKerlie; Arthur L Beaudet; Maja Bućan; Stephen A Murray Journal: Nature Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Thomas M Maynard; Anelia Horvath; James P Bernot; Beverly A Karpinski; Andre L P Tavares; Ankita Shah; Qianqian Zheng; Liam Spurr; Jacqueline Olender; Sally A Moody; Claire M Fraser; Anthony-S LaMantia; Norman H Lee Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: John P Sundberg; Tong Shen; Oliver Fiehn; Robert H Rice; Kathleen A Silva; Victoria E Kennedy; Nicholas E Gott; Louise A Dionne; Lesley S Bechtold; Stephen A Murray; Raoul Kuiper; C Herbert Pratt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240