| Literature DB >> 28700640 |
Oluwaremilekun G Ajakaye1, Oluwatola I Adedeji2, Paul O Ajayi3.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease and its distribution, in space and time, can be influenced by environmental factors such as rivers, elevation, slope, land surface temperature, land use/cover and rainfall. The aim of this study is to identify the areas with suitable conditions for schistosomiasis transmission on the basis of physical and environmental factors derived from satellite imagery and spatial analysis for Akure North Local Government Area (LGA) of Ondo State. Nigeria. This was done through methodology multicriteria evaluation (MCE) using Saaty's analytical hierarchy process (AHP). AHP is a multi-criteria decision method that uses hierarchical structures to represent a problem and makes decisions based on priority scales. In this research AHP was used to obtain the mapping weight or importance of each individual schistosomiasis risk factor. For the purpose of identifying areas of schistosomiasis risk, this study focused on temperature, drainage, elevation, rainfall, slope and land use/land cover as the factors controlling schistosomiasis incidence in the study area. It is by reclassifying and overlaying these factors that areas vulnerable to schistosomiasis were identified. The weighted overlay analysis was done after each factor was given the appropriate weight derived through the analytical hierarchical process. The prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in the study area was also determined by parasitological analysis of urine samples collected through random sampling. The results showed varying risk of schistosomiasis with a larger portion of the area (82%) falling under the high and very high risk category. The study also showed that one community (Oba Ile) had the lowest risk of schistosomiasis while the risk increased in the four remaining communities (Iju, Igoba, Ita Ogbolu and Ogbese). The predictions made by the model correlated strongly with observations from field study. The high risk zones corresponded to known endemic communities. This study revealed that environmental factors can be used in identifying and predicting the transmission of schistosomiasis as well as effective monitoring of disease risk in newly established rural and agricultural communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28700640 PMCID: PMC5524417 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Map of Akure North local government area.
Characteristics of imagery.
| S/N | Source | Date | Data Type | Spatial Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Aeronautical and Space Agency | DEM, Slope | 30 meters | |
| 2 | Landsat Operational Land Imager (OLI). ( | 5th Feb., 2015 | Landcover | 30 meters |
| 3 | Landsat Operational Land Imager (OLI) | 5th Dec., 2015 | Temperature, NDVI | 30 meters |
| 4 | European Meteorology Research Programme ( | Rainfall | 0.7metres |
Saaty’s pairwise comparison table.
| Intensity of Importance | Definition of Explanation | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Equal importance | Two factors contribute equally to the objective |
| 3 | Somewhat more important | Experience and judgement slightly favour one over the other |
| 5 | Much more important | Experience and judgement strongly favour one over the other |
| 7 | Very much more important | Experience and judgement very strongly favour one over the other |
| 9 | Absolutely more important | The evidence favouring one over the other is of the highest possible validity |
| 2,4,6,8 | Intermediate values | When compromise is needed |
Consistency index interpretation.
| Consistency Index | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 0 | |
| ≤ | Consistent enough |
| ≥ | Matrix needs improvement |
| ≥ | Judgments are just about random and are completely untrustworthy |
Environmental variables and suitability classes.
| Very Low(1) | Low(2) | High(3) | Very High(4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LST oC | < 20.0 | 20.0–22.9 | 23.0–26.0 | > 26.0 |
| Rainfall (mm) | < 1600 | 1600–1700 | 1701–1800 | >1800 |
| Elevation (m) | > 600 | 401–600 | 200–400 | < 200 |
| Land Use | Bareground | Settlement | Vegetation | Waterbody |
| NDVI | No Vegetation | Sparse Vegetation | Less denseVegetation | Dense Vegetation |
| Slope % | > 30 | 21–30 | 11–20 | < 10 |
| Proximity (m) | 1001–2000 | 501–1000 | 101–500 | < 100 |
Fig 2Extraction of environmental data (LST) from remotely sensed images for Akure North LGA.
Fig 8Map showing buffered rivers in Akure North LGA.
Comparison matrix of Risk factors used in the study.
| LST | RAINFALL | ELEVATION | LAND USE | NDVI | SLOPE | PROXMITY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LST | 1 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 9.00 | 7.00 |
| RAINFALL | 1.00 | 1 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 |
| ELEVATION | 0.20 | 0.33 | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 1.00 |
| LAND USE | 0.33 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 1 | 2.00 | 7.00 | 1.00 |
| NDVI | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1 | 6.00 | 0.50 |
| SLOPE | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 1 | 0.17 |
| PROXMITY | 0.14 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 1 |
CR = 0.052
Fig 9Risk map of schistosomiasis for Akure North LGA.
Area covered and number of buildings at risk of in Akure North LGA.
| Levels of risk | Area (km2) | Number of buildings |
|---|---|---|
| Very Low | 7.52 | 0 |
| Low | 98.17 | 8624 |
| High | 432.19 | 17541 |
| Very high | 110.15 | 8917 |
Prevalence of S. haematobium infection in Akure North LGA.
| Community | No examined | No (%)infected |
|---|---|---|
| Igoba | 352 | 57 (16.20) |
| Iju | 265 | 46 (17.40) |
| Ita Ogbolu | 374 | 130 (34.80) |
| Oba Ile | 174 | 8 (4.60) |
| Ogbese | 409 | 83 (20.30) |
| Total | 1,574 | 324 (20.60) |