Literature DB >> 28699990

Likelihood of malignancy in thyroid nodules according to a proposed Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) classification merging suspicious and benign ultrasound features.

Ricardo Luiz Costantin Delfim1, Leticia Carrasco Garcez da Veiga2, Ana Paula Aguiar Vidal2, Flávia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes3, Mário Vaisman2, Patrícia de Fatima Dos Santos Teixeira2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the ultrasound features of benign and malignant thyroid nodules and evaluate the likelihood of malignancy associated with each feature according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and histopathology. With this analysis, we propose a new TI-RADS classification system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The likelihood of malignancy from ultrasound features were assessed in 1413 thyroid nodules according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and histopathological findings. A score was established by attributing different weights to each ultrasound feature evaluated.
RESULTS: Features positively associated with malignancy in bivariate analysis received a score weight of +1. We attributed a weight of +2 to features which were independently associated with malignancy in a multivariate analysis and +3 for those associated with the highest odds ratio for malignancy (> 10.0). Hence, hypoechogenicity (graded as mild, moderate or marked, according to a comparison with the overlying strap muscle), microcalcification and irregular/microlobulated margin received the highest weights in our scoring system. Features that were negatively associated with malignancy received weights of -2 or -1. In the proposed system a cutoff score of 2 (sensitivity 97.4% and specificity 51.6%) was adopted as a transition between probably benign (TI-RADS 3) and TI-RADS 4a nodules. Overall, the frequency of malignancy in thyroid nodules according to the categories was 1.0% for TI-RADS 3, 7.8% for TI-RADS 4a, 35.3% for TI-RADS 4b, and 84.7% for TI-RADS 5.
CONCLUSION: A newly proposed TI-RADS classification adequately assessed the likelihood of malignancy in thyroid nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699990     DOI: 10.1590/2359-3997000000262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 2359-3997            Impact factor:   2.309


  10 in total

1.  Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture.

Authors:  Ji Ye Lee; Dong Gyu Na; So Jin Yoon; Hye Yun Gwon; Wooyul Paik; Taeeun Kim; Jin Yub Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  NEW PROPOSED FORMULA OF TI-RADS CLASSIFICATION BASED ON ULTRASOUND FINDINGS.

Authors:  S Rahemi Karizaki; S A Alamdaran; S Bonakdaran; N Morovatdar; A H Jafarain; A Sharifi Hadad; A Hadadzade
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

Review 3.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) for ultrasound features of nodules: multicentric retrospective study in China.

Authors:  JianQiao Zhou; YanYan Song; WeiWei Zhan; Xi Wei; Sheng Zhang; RuiFang Zhang; Ying Gu; Xia Chen; Liying Shi; XiaoMao Luo; LiChun Yang; QiaoYing Li; BaoYan Bai; XinHua Ye; Hong Zhai; Hua Zhang; XiaoHong Jia; YiJie Dong; JingWen Zhang; ZhiFang Yang; HuiTing Zhang; Yi Zheng; WenWen Xu; LiMei Lai; LiXue Yin
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS.

Authors:  JianQiao Zhou; LiXue Yin; Xi Wei; Sheng Zhang; YanYan Song; BaoMing Luo; JianChu Li; LinXue Qian; LiGang Cui; Wen Chen; ChaoYang Wen; YuLan Peng; Qin Chen; Man Lu; Min Chen; Rong Wu; Wei Zhou; EnSheng Xue; YingJia Li; LiChun Yang; ChengRong Mi; RuiFang Zhang; Gang Wu; GuoQing Du; DaoZhong Huang; WeiWei Zhan
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Diagnostic performance of US-based FNAB criteria of the 2020 Chinese guideline for malignant thyroid nodules: comparison with the 2017 American College of Radiology guideline, the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline, and the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association guideline.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Yan Yang; Senmin Wu; Kai Chen; Hongxia Luo; Jianle Huang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

7.  Do ACR TI-RADS scores demonstrate unique thyroid molecular profiles?

Authors:  Rong Xia; Wei Sun; Joseph Yee; Sheila Sheth; Chrystia Slywotzky; Steven Hodak; Tamar C Brandler
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2021-12-20

8.  Comparison of Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging with Conventional Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems in Presurgical Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  M Shreyamsa; Anand Mishra; Pooja Ramakant; Anit Parihar; Kul R Singh; Chanchal Rana; Sasi Mouli
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-01-12

9.  Correlation Between Ultrasound and Cytological Findings of Patients With Suspicious Thyroid Nodules: The King Hamad University Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Raneem Alshaikh; Khalid Almaghribi; Dhaidan M Alshammari; Hosameldin Mohamad; Wael Ebrahim; Shuruq M Alshammari; Omar Sabra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-05

10.  Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules according to echotexture and degree of hypoechogenicity: a retrospective multicenter validation study.

Authors:  Ji Ye Lee; Chang Yoon Lee; Inpyeong Hwang; Sung-Hye You; Sun-Won Park; Boeun Lee; Ra Gyoung Yoon; Younghee Yim; Ji-Hoon Kim; Dong Gyu Na
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.