Literature DB >> 28699923

The Effects of Moderate- Versus High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Growth, Body Composition, and Performance in Collegiate Women.

Jason M Cholewa1, Fabricio E Rossi1,2, Christopher MacDonald1, Amy Hewins1, Samantha Gallo1, Ashley Micenski1, Layne Norton3, Bill I Campbell4.   

Abstract

Cholewa, JM, Rossi, FE, MacDonald, C, Hewins, A, Gallo, S, Micenski, A, Norton, L, and Campbell, BI. The effects of moderate- versus high-load resistance training on muscle growth, body composition, and performance in collegiate women. J Strength Cond Res 32(6): 1511-1524, 2018-Twenty young women (20.3 + 1.5 years, 164 + 6 cm, 68.7 + 13.8 kg) without prior structured resistance training experience were recruited for this study. Body composition (BodPod), compartmental water (Bioelectrical Impedance), 7-site skinfold, and arm and thigh cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after 8-week training. Performance testing consisted of vertical jump, 3-kg chest pass initial velocity, squat 1RM, and overhead press 1RM. After 2 weeks of familiarization training, subjects were matched for body composition and relative squat strength and randomly assigned to either a high-load (HL: n = 10; 4 sets of 5-7 repetitions) or moderate-load (ML: n = 10; 2 sets of 10-14 repetitions) group that completed 6-7 exercises per day performed to momentary muscular failure. Training was divided into 2 lower and one upper body training sessions per week performed on nonconsecutive days for 8 weeks. There were no statistically significant main effects for group or group × time interactions for any variable assessed. Both HL and ML resulted in similar significant increases in lean body mass (1.5 ± 0.83 kg), lean dry mass (1.32 ± 0.62 kg), thigh CSA (6.6 ± 5.6 cm), vertical jump (2.9 ± 3.2 cm), chest pass velocity (0.334 ± 1.67 m·s), back squat one repetition maximum (1RM) (22.5 ± 8.1 kg), and overhead press (3.0 ± 0.8 kg). High-load group and ML group also both resulted in significant decreases in percent body fat (1.3 ± 1.3%), total body water (0.73 ± 0.70 L), and intracellular water (0.43 ± 0.38 L). The results of this study indicate that both moderate-load and high-load training are effective at improving muscle growth, body composition, strength and power in untrained young women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28699923     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  The effects of chronic betaine supplementation on body composition and performance in collegiate females: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  Jason Michael Cholewa; Andrea Hudson; Taylor Cicholski; Amanda Cervenka; Karley Barreno; Kayla Broom; McKenzie Barch; Stuart A S Craig
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Rationale and Feasibility of Resistance Training in hEDS/HSD: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Hannah A Zabriskie
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-08-20

3.  A 4-Week Intervention Involving Mobile-Based Daily 6-Minute Micro-Sessions of Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Strength and Quality of Life, but Not Cardio-Respiratory Fitness of Young Untrained Adults.

Authors:  Billy Sperlich; Lea-Sofie Hahn; Antonia Edel; Tino Behr; Julian Helmprobst; Robert Leppich; Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.