Literature DB >> 28699820

Expanded strain coverage for a highly successful public health tool: Prophylactic 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine.

Zhigang Zhang1, Jun Zhang1, Ningshao Xia1,2, Qinjian Zhao1.   

Abstract

Human papillomavirus is considered the causative factor for cervical cancer, which accounts for approximately 5% of the global cancer burden and more than 600,000 new cases annually that are attributable to HPV infection worldwide. The first-generation prophylactic HPV vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix®, were licensed approximately a decade ago. Both vaccines contain the most prevalent high-risk types, HPV16 and 18, which are associated with 70% of cervical cancer. To further increase the type coverage, 5 additional oncogenic HPV types (31, 33, 45, 52 and 58) were added to the existing Gardasil-4 to develop a 9-valent HPV vaccine (9vHPV), Gardasil 9®, increasing the potential level of protection from ∼70% to ∼90%. The efficacy of the vaccine lies primarily in its ability to elicit type-specific and neutralizing antibodies to fend off the viral infection. Therefore, type-specific and neutralizing murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used to quantitate the antigenicity of the individual vaccine antigens and to measure the antibody levels in the serum samples from vaccinees in a type- and epitope-specific manner in a competitive immunoassay. Assays for 9vHPV are extended from the proven platform used for 4vHPV by developing and adding new mAbs against the additional types. In Phase III clinical trials, comparable safety profile and immunogenicity against the original 4 types were demonstrated for the 9vHPV vaccine, and these were comparable to the 4vHPV vaccine. The efficacy of the 9vHPV vaccine was established in trials with young women. Immunobridging for younger boys and girls was performed, and the results showed higher immunogenicity in the younger age group. In a subsequent clinical trial, the 2-dose regimen of the 9vHPV vaccine used among girls and boys aged 9-14 y showed non-inferior immunogenicity to the regular 3-dose regimen for young women (aged 16-26 years). Overall, the clinical data and cost-effectiveness analysis for the 9vHPV vaccine support its widespread use to maximize the impact of this important, life-saving vaccine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-dose vaccination; comparable immunogenicity; human papillomavirus; immuno bridging; neutralizing antibodies; prophylactic vaccine; vaccine efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699820      PMCID: PMC5647960          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1346755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  95 in total

1.  Oncogenic Herpes viruses.

Authors:  H zur Hausen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-03-20

2.  Correlation between mouse potency and in vitro relative potency for human papillomavirus Type 16 virus-like particles and Gardasil vaccine samples.

Authors:  M Shank-Retzlaff; F Wang; T Morley; C Anderson; M Hamm; M Brown; K Rowland; G Pancari; J Zorman; R Lowe; L Schultz; J Teyral; R Capen; C B Oswald; Y Wang; M Washabaugh; K Jansen; R Sitrin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2005-09-20

3.  Evaluation of the thermal stability of Gardasil.

Authors:  Mary L Shank-Retzlaff; Qinjian Zhao; Carrie Anderson; Melissa Hamm; Katrina High; Mai Nguyen; Feng Wang; Ning Wang; Bei Wang; Yang Wang; Michael Washabaugh; Robert Sitrin; Li Shi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2006-07-04

Review 4.  Human papillomavirus: the burden of infection.

Authors:  Dorothy Wiley; Emmanuel Masongsong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.347

5.  Optimization and validation of a multiplexed luminex assay to quantify antibodies to neutralizing epitopes on human papillomaviruses 6, 11, 16, and 18.

Authors:  Dennis Dias; Jeff Van Doren; Sonela Schlottmann; Sheri Kelly; Derek Puchalski; Wanda Ruiz; Patricia Boerckel; Joseph Kessler; Joseph M Antonello; Tina Green; Martha Brown; Judith Smith; Narendra Chirmule; Eliav Barr; Kathrin U Jansen; Mark T Esser
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-08

6.  Cross-neutralization of cutaneous and mucosal Papillomavirus types with anti-sera to the amino terminus of L2.

Authors:  Diana V Pastrana; Ratish Gambhira; Christopher B Buck; Yuk-Ying S Pang; Cynthia D Thompson; Timothy D Culp; Neil D Christensen; Douglas R Lowy; John T Schiller; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Minor capsid protein of human genital papillomaviruses contains subdominant, cross-neutralizing epitopes.

Authors:  R B Roden; W H Yutzy; R Fallon; S Inglis; D R Lowy; J T Schiller
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2000-05-10       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 8.  Human papillomavirus: a review.

Authors:  Mathijs H Brentjens; Kimberly A Yeung-Yue; Patricia C Lee; Stephen K Tyring
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.478

9.  Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective.

Authors:  Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch; Xavier Castellsagué; Mireia Díaz; Silvia de Sanjose; Doudja Hammouda; Keerti V Shah; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Simultaneous quantitation of antibodies to neutralizing epitopes on virus-like particles for human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18 by a multiplexed luminex assay.

Authors:  David Opalka; Charles E Lachman; Stefani A MacMullen; Kathrin U Jansen; Judith F Smith; Narendra Chirmule; Mark T Esser
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessing sociodemographic differences in human papillomavirus vaccine impact studies in the United States: a systematic review using narrative synthesis.

Authors:  L R Avni-Singer; A Yakely; S S Sheth; E D Shapiro; L M Niccolai; C R Oliveira
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.427

2.  Structural characterization of a neutralizing mAb H16.001, a potent candidate for a common potency assay for various HPV16 VLPs.

Authors:  Weijin Huang; Maozhou He; Tingting Ning; Jianhui Nie; Feng Zhang; Qingbing Zheng; Rui Zhang; Ying Xu; Ying Gu; Shaowei Li; Youchun Wang
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 7.344

3.  The cost-effectiveness of controlling cervical cancer using a new 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine among school-aged girls in Australia.

Authors:  Rashidul Alam Mahumud; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Dunn; Jeff Gow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exploring lay public and dental professional knowledge around HPV transmission via oral sex and oral cancer development.

Authors:  Mario A Brondani; Adriana B Siqueira; Claudia Maria Coelho Alves
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Gaps and Opportunities to Improve Prevention of Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancers.

Authors:  Irene O Aninye; J Michael Berry-Lawhorn; Paul Blumenthal; Tamika Felder; Naomi Jay; Janette Merrill; Jenna B Messman; Sarah Nielsen; Rebecca Perkins; Tami Rowen; Debbie Saslow; Connie Liu Trimble; Karen Smith-McCune
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  High Expression of Circular RNA-Mitochondrial tRNA Translation Optimization 1 Assists the Diagnosis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xiyun Cheng; Changmei Shen; Zhenrong Liao
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 7.  Twenty years of research on HPV vaccines based on genetically modified lactic acid bacteria: an overview on the gut-vagina axis.

Authors:  Sedigheh Taghinezhad-S; Hossein Keyvani; Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán; Gilbert G G Donders; Xiangsheng Fu; Amir Hossein Mohseni
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 9.261

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.