Literature DB >> 28699412

Pressure Autoregulation Measurement Techniques in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury, Part II: A Scoping Review of Continuous Methods.

Frederick A Zeiler1,2,3, Joseph Donnelly4, Leanne Calviello4, Peter Smielewski4, David K Menon1, Marek Czosnyka4.   

Abstract

A scoping review of the literature was performed systematically on commonly described continuous autoregulation measurement techniques in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) to provide an overview of methodology and comprehensive reference library of the available literature for each technique. Five separate small systematic reviews were conducted for each of the continuous techniques: pressure reactivity index (PRx), laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) techniques, brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2), and thermal diffusion (TD) techniques. Articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, Scopus, Cochrane Library (inception to December 2016), and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. A two-tier filter of references was conducted. The literature base identified from the individual searches was limited, except for PRx. The total number of articles using each of the five searched techniques for continuous autoregulation in adult TBI were: PRx (28), LDF (4), NIRS (9), PbtO2 (10), and TD (8). All continuous techniques described in adult TBI are based on moving correlation coefficients. The premise behind the calculation of these moving correlation coefficients focuses on the impact of slow fluctuations in either mean arterial pressure (MAP) or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) on some indirect measure of cerebral blood flow (CBF), such as: intracranial pressure (ICP), LDF, NIRS signals, PbtO2, or TD CBF. The thought is the correlation between a hemodynamic driving factor, such as MAP or CPP, and a surrogate for CBF or cerebral perfusion sheds insight on the state of cerebral autoregulation. Both PRx and NIRS indices were validated experimentally against the "gold standard" static autoregulatory curve (Lassen curve) at least around the lower threshold of autoregulation. The PRx has the largest literature base supporting the association with patient outcome. Various methods of continuous autoregulation assessment are described within the adult TBI literature. Many studies exist on these various indices, suggesting an association between their values and patient morbidity/death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult TBI; autoregulation measurement; continuous techniques; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699412     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  20 in total

1.  Association between Cerebrovascular Reactivity Monitoring and Mortality Is Preserved When Adjusting for Baseline Admission Characteristics in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Eric P Thelin; Nino Stocchetti; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Diffuse Intracranial Injury Patterns Are Associated with Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Validation Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; François Mathieu; Miguel Monteiro; Ben Glocker; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Nino Stocchetti; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Virginia Newcombe; David K Menon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Validation of Intracranial Pressure-Derived Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices against the Lower Limit of Autoregulation, Part II: Experimental Model of Arterial Hypotension.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Jennifer K Lee; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Ken Brady
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Validation of Pressure Reactivity and Pulse Amplitude Indices against the Lower Limit of Autoregulation, Part I: Experimental Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Joseph Donnelly; Leanne Calviello; Jennifer K Lee; Peter Smielewski; Ken Brady; Dong-Joo Kim; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Association between cerebrovascular reactivity in adult traumatic brain injury and improvement in patient outcome over time: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Y Stein; Logan Froese; Alwyn Gomez; Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi; Carleen Batson; Francois Mathieu; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 6.  The Limited Impact of Current Therapeutic Interventions on Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Overview.

Authors:  Logan Froese; Carleen Batson; Alwyn Gomez; Josh Dian; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Statistical Cerebrovascular Reactivity Signal Properties after Secondary Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Pilot Analysis.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Marcel Aries; Manuel Cabeleira; Thomas A van Essen; Nino Stocchetti; David K Menon; Ivan Timofeev; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Peter Hutchinson; Ari Ercole
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring-Review and Avenues for Development.

Authors:  Maya Harary; Rianne G F Dolmans; William B Gormley
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  ICP Versus Laser Doppler Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices to Assess Brain Autoregulatory Capacity.

Authors:  F A Zeiler; J Donnelly; D Cardim; D K Menon; P Smielewski; M Czosnyka
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Evaluation of the relationship between slow-waves of intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressure and brain tissue oxygen in TBI: a CENTER-TBI exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Manuel Cabeleira; Peter J Hutchinson; Nino Stocchetti; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Ari Ercole
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.