| Literature DB >> 28699399 |
Ilaria Franconi1, Carmen La Cerra1, Anna Rita Marucci1, Cristina Petrucci1, Loreto Lancia1.
Abstract
Axillary digital thermometers (ADTs) and non-contact (infrared) forehead thermometers (NCIFTs) are commonly used in pediatric settings, where an incorrect body temperature measurement may delay treatments or lead to incorrect diagnoses and therapies. Several studies comparing ADT or NCIFT with other methods have found conflicting results. To investigate whether ADT and NCIFT can be used interchangeably, a comparative observational study was conducted involving 205 children aged 0 to 14 years who were consecutively admitted to the pediatric emergency department. The Bland-Altman plot illustrated agreement between the two methods. A total of 217 pairs of measurements were compared; axillary measurements showed average values significantly higher than forehead measurements (37.52°C and 37.12°C; t = 7.42, p = .000), with a mean difference of 0.41°C between the two methods (range = -1.80 and +2.40). In this setting and population, ADT and NCIFT cannot be used interchangeably.Entities:
Keywords: body temperature; digital axillary thermometer; infrared forehead thermometer; pediatric nursing
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28699399 DOI: 10.1177/1054773816676538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Nurs Res ISSN: 1054-7738 Impact factor: 2.075