Timothy T Houle1,2, Dana P Turner1,2, Adrienne N Golding2, John A H Porter3, Vincent T Martin4, Donald B Penzien2, Charles H Tegeler5. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. 3. Neurology and Pain Consultants, Advance, NC (J. A. H. Porter). 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 5. Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prediction model that forecasts future migraine attacks for an individual headache sufferer. BACKGROUND: Many headache patients and physicians believe that precipitants of headache can be identified and avoided or managed to reduce the frequency of headache attacks. Of the numerous candidate triggers, perceived stress has received considerable attention for its association with the onset of headache in episodic and chronic headache sufferers. However, no evidence is available to support forecasting headache attacks within individuals using any of the candidate headache triggers. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort with forecasting model development study enrolled 100 participants with episodic migraine with or without aura, and N = 95 contributed 4626 days of electronic diary data and were included in the analysis. Individual headache forecasts were derived from current headache state and current levels of stress using several aspects of the Daily Stress Inventory, a measure of daily hassles that is completed at the end of each day. The primary outcome measure was the presence/absence of any headache attack (head pain > 0 on a numerical rating scale of 0-10) over the next 24 h period. RESULTS: After removing missing data (n = 431 days), participants in the study experienced a headache attack on 1613/4195 (38.5%) days. A generalized linear mixed-effects forecast model using either the frequency of stressful events or the perceived intensity of these events fit the data well. This simple forecasting model possessed promising predictive utility with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) in the training sample and an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.6-0.67) in a leave-one-out validation sample. This forecasting model had a Brier score of 0.202 and possessed good calibration between forecasted probabilities and observed frequencies but had only low levels of resolution (ie, sharpness). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that future headache attacks can be forecasted for a diverse group of individuals over time. Future work will enhance prediction through improvements in the assessment of stress as well as the development of other candidate domains to use in the models.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prediction model that forecasts future migraine attacks for an individual headache sufferer. BACKGROUND: Many headachepatients and physicians believe that precipitants of headache can be identified and avoided or managed to reduce the frequency of headache attacks. Of the numerous candidate triggers, perceived stress has received considerable attention for its association with the onset of headache in episodic and chronic headache sufferers. However, no evidence is available to support forecasting headache attacks within individuals using any of the candidate headache triggers. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort with forecasting model development study enrolled 100 participants with episodic migraine with or without aura, and N = 95 contributed 4626 days of electronic diary data and were included in the analysis. Individual headache forecasts were derived from current headache state and current levels of stress using several aspects of the Daily Stress Inventory, a measure of daily hassles that is completed at the end of each day. The primary outcome measure was the presence/absence of any headache attack (head pain > 0 on a numerical rating scale of 0-10) over the next 24 h period. RESULTS: After removing missing data (n = 431 days), participants in the study experienced a headache attack on 1613/4195 (38.5%) days. A generalized linear mixed-effects forecast model using either the frequency of stressful events or the perceived intensity of these events fit the data well. This simple forecasting model possessed promising predictive utility with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) in the training sample and an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.6-0.67) in a leave-one-out validation sample. This forecasting model had a Brier score of 0.202 and possessed good calibration between forecasted probabilities and observed frequencies but had only low levels of resolution (ie, sharpness). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that future headache attacks can be forecasted for a diverse group of individuals over time. Future work will enhance prediction through improvements in the assessment of stress as well as the development of other candidate domains to use in the models.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: R K Cady; F Sheftell; R B Lipton; S O'Quinn; M Jones; D G Putnam; A Crisp; A Metz; S McNeal Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Timothy T Houle; Ross A Butschek; Dana P Turner; Todd A Smitherman; Jeanetta C Rains; Donald B Penzien Journal: Pain Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: N J Giffin; L Ruggiero; R B Lipton; S D Silberstein; J F Tvedskov; J Olesen; J Altman; P J Goadsby; A Macrae Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-03-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Elizabeth K Seng; Alexandra B Singer; Christopher Metts; Amy S Grinberg; Zarine S Patel; Maya Marzouk; Lauren Rosenberg; Melissa Day; Mia T Minen; Richard B Lipton; Dawn C Buse Journal: Headache Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Timo Klan; Charly Gaul; Eva Liesering-Latta; Bernhard Both; Isabella Held; Severin Hennemann; Michael Witthöft Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Farwa Athar; Afra Zahid; Minaam Farooq; Muhammad Ayyan; Mohammad Ashraf; Mukarram Farooq; Faiza Naeem; Aamna Badar; Muhammad Ehsan; Ayesha Hussain; Muhammad Abdullah Ilyas Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2022-09-17