Literature DB >> 28699273

Improved autologous cortical bone harvest and viability with 2Flute otologic burs.

Adam A Roth1, Pei-Ciao Tang1, Michael J Ye2, Khalid S Mohammad2, Rick F Nelson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if 2Flute (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI) otologic burs improve the size, cellular content, and bone healing of autologous cortical bone grafts harvested during canal wall reconstruction (CWR) tympanomastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration. STUDY
DESIGN: Institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Human autologous cortical bone chips were harvested using various burs (4 and 6 mm diameter; multiflute, and 2Flute [Stryker Corporation]) from patients undergoing CWR tympanomastoidectomy for the treatment of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. Bone chip size, cell counts, cellular gene expression, and new bone formation were quantified.
RESULTS: Bone chips were significantly larger when harvested with 2Flute (Stryker Corporation) bur compared to multiflute burs at both 6 mm diameter (113 ± 14 μm2 vs. 66 ± 8 μm2 ; P < 0.05) and 4 mm diameter (70 ± 8 μm2 vs. 50 ± 3 μm2 ; P < 0.05). After 2 weeks in culture, cell numbers were significantly higher when harvested with 2Flute (Stryker Corporation) bur compared to multiflute burs at both 6 mm diameter (48.7 ± 3 vs. 31.8 ± 3 cells/μg bone; P < 0.05) and 4 mm diameter (27.6 ± 1.2 vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 cells/μg bone; P < 0.05). Bone-derived cells express osteoblast markers (alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin). Cultured cells are able to form new bone in culture, and bone formation is facilitated by the presence of bone chips.
CONCLUSION: Use of 2Flute (Stryker Corporation) otologic burs for human autologous cortical bone harvest results in more viable bone fragments, with larger bone chips and more osteoblasts. Future studies are needed to determine if this leads to improved bone healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 128:E41-E46, 2018.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; autologous; burs; canal wall reconstruction tympanomastoidectomy; cholesteatoma; drill; healing; mastoidectomy; viability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699273     DOI: 10.1002/lary.26779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Outpatient management of cholesteatoma with canal wall reconstruction tympanomastoidectomy.

Authors:  Richard Kao; Todd Wannemuehler; Charles W Yates; Rick F Nelson
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-31

2.  Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.

Authors:  Vincent J Casey; Cian Martin; Peter Curtin; Kevin Buckley; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Dhruv Sharma; Vincent J Campiti; Michael J Ye; Mohamad Saltagi; Aaron E Carroll; Jonathan Y Ting; Elisa A Illing; Jae Hong Park; Rick F Nelson; Sarah J Burgin
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.