Literature DB >> 28699202

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: Clinical and biological profiles.

Armelle Vinceneux1,2, Franck Bruyère3, Olivier Haillot3, Thomas Charles4, Alexandre de la Taille5, Laurent Salomon5, Yves Allory6, Idir Ouzaid7, Laurence Choudat8, Morgan Rouprêt9, Eva Comperat10, Nadine Houede11, Jean-Baptiste Beauval12, Patrick Vourc'h13, Gaëlle Fromont1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of prostate cancer (PCa). In the present study, we analyzed the clinical and biological characteristics of DAC, in comparison with high grade conventional acinar PCa.
METHODS: Samples and data were retrospectively collected from seven institutions and centrally reviewed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays to assess the expression of candidate proteins, based on the molecular classification of PCa, including ERG, PTEN, and SPINK1. SPOP mutations were investigated from tumor DNA by Sanger sequencing. Relationships with outcome were analyzed using log-rank analysis and multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: Among 56 reviewed prostatectomy specimens, 45 cases of DAC were finally confirmed. The pathological stage was pT3 in more than 66% of cases. ERG was expressed in 42% of DAC, SPINK1 in 9% (all ERG-negative), and two cases (ERG-negative) harbored a SPOP mutation. Compared to high grade conventional PCa matched for the pathological stage, cell proliferation was higher (P = 0.04) in DAC, and complete PTEN loss more frequent (P = 0.023). In multivariate analysis, SPINK1 overexpression (P = 0.017) and loss of PSA immunostaining (P = 0.02) were significantly associated with biochemical recurrence.
CONCLUSION: these results suggest that, despite biological differences that highlighted DAC aggressiveness, the molecular classification recently proposed in conventional PCa could also be applied in DAC.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ductal adenocarcinoma; immunochemistry; prostate cancer; speckle-type POZ protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699202     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  11 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of prostate cancer in Middle Eastern population highlights differences with Western populations with prognostic implication.

Authors:  Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Intraductal/ductal histology and lymphovascular invasion are associated with germline DNA-repair gene mutations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pedro Isaacsson Velho; John L Silberstein; Mark C Markowski; Jun Luo; Tamara L Lotan; William B Isaacs; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 3.  Functional analysis of Cullin 3 E3 ligases in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jianping Guo; Zhiwei Wang; Brian J North; Kaixiong Tao; Xiangpeng Dai; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 10.680

4.  Integrative Genomic Analysis of Coincident Cancer Foci Implicates CTNNB1 and PTEN Alterations in Ductal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marc Gillard; Justin Lack; Andrea Pontier; Divya Gandla; David Hatcher; Adam G Sowalsky; Jose Rodriguez-Nieves; Donald Vander Griend; Gladell Paner; David VanderWeele
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 5.  SPOP and cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison Clark; Marieke Burleson
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 6.  Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weranja Ranasinghe; Daniel D Shapiro; Miao Zhang; Tharakeswara Bathala; Nora Navone; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Ana Aparicio; Shi-Ming Tu; Chad Tang; John W Davis; Louis Pisters; Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  A first case of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate having characteristics of neuroendocrine phenotype with PTEN, RB1 and TP53 alterations.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kobayashi; Takeo Kosaka; Kohei Nakamura; Kazunori Shojo; Hiroshi Hongo; Shuji Mikami; Hiroshi Nishihara; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 8.  The diverse roles of SPOP in prostate cancer and kidney cancer.

Authors:  Zhiwei Wang; Yizuo Song; Miaomiao Ye; Xiaoming Dai; Xueqiong Zhu; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  The SPOP-ITCH Signaling Axis Protects Against Prostate Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Jinlu Ma; Mengjiao Cai; Yaqi Mo; Joshua S Fried; Xinyue Tan; Yuan Ma; Jie Chen; Suxia Han; Bo Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Functional roles of Speckle-Type Poz (SPOP) Protein in Genomic stability.

Authors:  Xi Wei; Joshua Fried; Ying Li; Linfei Hu; Ming Gao; Sheng Zhang; Bo Xu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.