Literature DB >> 28699038

[Subjective patient satisfaction after nasal septumplasty].

J Lindemann1, A von Bomhard2, T Hoffmann3, M Scheithauer3, A-S Grossi3, F Sommer3, S Ott4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Septal surgery (SP) is one of the most frequently performed operations in Germany and thus represents a high cost burden for the health system. However, sufficient data on postoperative patient satisfaction and objective indication criteria for surgery are still lacking.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine postoperative patient satisfaction and possible factors influencing the subjective success of SP, in order to optimize preoperative indication establishment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 600 questionnaires were sent by mail, resulting in inclusion of 238 patients (60 female, 178 male) who had received SP. The questionnaires were retrospectively evaluated using validated questionnaires (NOSE-D, SNOT-20-GAV) as well as a self-designed questionnaire regarding patients' subjective satisfaction after SP. Clinical data were collected from the electronic patient record.
RESULTS: Follow-up was between 2 and 11 years. The main symptom for SP was difficult nasal breathing in 89% (212 of 238) of patients. In total, 68% (161) were satisfied with the outcome of surgery and 73% (172) of the patients would opt for SP again. The scores of the visual analog scales for nasal breathing, smell, nasal secretion, physical performance, use of nose drops, and headache were statistically significantly improved postoperatively. Additionally, the analysis of Nose-D and SNOT-20-GAV questionnaires presented a significant improvement in scores. Surprisingly, patients with a prolonged duration of septal splints were more satisfied. Previous nasal surgery had no significant influence.
CONCLUSION: SP leads to a high degree of patient satisfaction, if the indication for surgery is correct. The main complaint of patients should be "difficult" nasal breathing. SP leads to a significant improvement in preoperative symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient satisfaction; Quality of life; Questionaire; Rhinosurgery; Septal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699038     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0390-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  23 in total

1.  Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.

Authors:  Michael G Stewart; David L Witsell; Timothy L Smith; Edward M Weaver; Bevan Yueh; Maureen T Hannley
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Forces motivating the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings and related clinical research.

Authors:  S O Thier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.

Authors:  R F André; H D Vuyk; A Ahmed; K Graamans; G J Nolst Trenité
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  The efficacy of nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  I Samad; H E Stevens; A Maloney
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1992-04

Review 5.  Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  A clinical follow-up of septal surgery with special attention to the value of preoperative rhinomanometric examination in the decision concerning operation.

Authors:  M Holmström; J Kumlien
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1988-04

7.  Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology.

Authors:  Michael G Stewart; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

8.  [Clinical success of surgical correction of the nasal septum].

Authors:  E M Bitzer; H Dörning; F W Schwartz
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.057

9.  Objective and subjective nasal airflow.

Authors:  E Yaniv; T Hadar; J Shvero; E Raveh
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Revision septoplasty: a prospective disease-specific outcome study.

Authors:  Grant S Gillman; Ann M Egloff; Carlos M Rivera-Serrano
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.