Merja Rantakokko1, Kirsi E Keskinen2, Katja Kokko2, Erja Portegijs2. 1. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35 (viv), 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland. merja.rantakokko@jyu.fi. 2. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35 (viv), 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The research aim was to study the associations of nature diversity with quality of life (QoL) and depressive symptoms among older people, and whether physical activity explains the associations. METHODS: Community-dwelling people aged 75-90 years (n = 848) living in Central Finland were interviewed in their homes. QoL was assessed with a short version of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment (range 0-130, higher score indicates better QoL) and depressive symptoms with the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (range 0-30, higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms). Self-reported physical activity was assessed by intensity and duration using a single question with seven response options ranging from mostly resting to competitive sports. Nature diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) was assessed objectively within a 500-m buffer around participants' homes using a geographic information system (GIS). RESULTS: Mean QoL was 100.3 (SD 11.8) and mean CES-D 9.6 (SD 6.8). Those in the highest nature diversity tertile had better QoL than those in the lowest tertile (p = .022). Physical activity did not explain the association between nature diversity and QoL. Adjustment for health indicators did not change the results. Nature diversity was not associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: A diverse environment, especially when this includes elements of nature, is associated with better QoL. Good quality of the green infrastructure and adding natural elements to residential areas may enhance well-being among community-dwelling older people.
BACKGROUND: The research aim was to study the associations of nature diversity with quality of life (QoL) and depressive symptoms among older people, and whether physical activity explains the associations. METHODS: Community-dwelling people aged 75-90 years (n = 848) living in Central Finland were interviewed in their homes. QoL was assessed with a short version of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment (range 0-130, higher score indicates better QoL) and depressive symptoms with the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (range 0-30, higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms). Self-reported physical activity was assessed by intensity and duration using a single question with seven response options ranging from mostly resting to competitive sports. Nature diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) was assessed objectively within a 500-m buffer around participants' homes using a geographic information system (GIS). RESULTS: Mean QoL was 100.3 (SD 11.8) and mean CES-D 9.6 (SD 6.8). Those in the highest nature diversity tertile had better QoL than those in the lowest tertile (p = .022). Physical activity did not explain the association between nature diversity and QoL. Adjustment for health indicators did not change the results. Nature diversity was not associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: A diverse environment, especially when this includes elements of nature, is associated with better QoL. Good quality of the green infrastructure and adding natural elements to residential areas may enhance well-being among community-dwelling older people.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging; Depression; Diversity; Environment; Nature; Quality of life
Authors: Young Shin Park; Jean F Wyman; Barbara J McMorris; Lisiane Pruinelli; Ying Song; Merrie J Kaas; Scott E Sherman; Steven Fu Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-09-03
Authors: Maria do Carmo Correia de Lima; Mathieu Dallaire; Catherine Tremblay; Alexis Nicole; Émilie Fortin; Isabela Calixto Maluf; Josée Nepton; Anne-France Severn; Patrice Tremblay; Sharlène Côté; Julie Bouchard; Rubens A da Silva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 4.614