| Literature DB >> 28698639 |
Shubin Li1,2, Peng Huang3, Guochang Ding4, Lili Zhou5, Piao Tang1, Min Sun1, Yingying Zheng1, Sizu Lin6,7.
Abstract
In order to ascertain the optimal hormone combination for Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) leaf cuttings, an L16(4)4 orthogonal test of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) (0, 10, 30, or 50 mg · L-1 of each exogenous hormone) immersion for 5, 10, 15, or 20 min was conducted. Callus initiation rate and rooting promotion rate were mainly affected by treatment time, root length increase by 6-BA concentration, and bud germination rate and plantlet formation rate by NAA concentration. The expected optimal combination for callus initiation rate was 50 mg · L-1 6-BA + 0 mg · L-1 NAA + 30 mg · L-1 IBA + 10 min; for rooting promotion rate, it was 0-10 mg · L-1 6-BA + 10 mg · L-1 NAA + 30 mg · L-1 IBA + 20 min; for bud germination rate, it was 50 mg · L-1 6-BA + 0-10 mg · L-1 NAA + 0-30 mg · L-1 IBA + 20 min; and for seedling formation rate for No. 4, it was 10 mg · L-1 6-BA + 10 mg · L-1 NAA + 0 mg · L-1 IBA + 20 min. Light microscopy image analysis revealed that a cluster of primordial cells was produced 40 days after cutting, and mastoid cells developed into peninsula cells in calli that were cultured for 50 days.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28698639 PMCID: PMC5506016 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05295-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
L16(4)4 orthogonal design used in the study.
| Test no. | (A) 6-BA (mg · L−1) | (B) NAA (mg · L−1) | (C) IBA (mg · L−1) | (D) Time (min) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A1 | 0 | B1 | 0 | C1 | 0 | D1 | 5 |
| 2 | A1 | 0 | B2 | 10 | C2 | 10 | D2 | 10 |
| 3 | A1 | 0 | B3 | 30 | C3 | 30 | D3 | 15 |
| 4 | A1 | 0 | B4 | 50 | C4 | 50 | D4 | 20 |
| 5 | A2 | 10 | B1 | 0 | C2 | 10 | D3 | 15 |
| 6 | A2 | 10 | B2 | 10 | C1 | 0 | D4 | 20 |
| 7 | A2 | 10 | B3 | 30 | C4 | 50 | D1 | 0 |
| 8 | A2 | 10 | B4 | 50 | C3 | 30 | D2 | 10 |
| 9 | A3 | 30 | B1 | 0 | C3 | 30 | D4 | 20 |
| 10 | A3 | 30 | B2 | 10 | C4 | 50 | D3 | 15 |
| 11 | A3 | 30 | B3 | 30 | C1 | 0 | D2 | 10 |
| 12 | A3 | 30 | B4 | 50 | C2 | 10 | D1 | 0 |
| 13 | A4 | 50 | B1 | 0 | C4 | 50 | D2 | 10 |
| 14 | A4 | 50 | B2 | 10 | C3 | 30 | D1 | 0 |
| 15 | A4 | 50 | B3 | 30 | C2 | 10 | D4 | 20 |
| 16 | A4 | 50 | B4 | 50 | C1 | 0 | D3 | 15 |
Figure 1Callus and root initiation in a leaf cutting from Chinese fir. (a) Callus initiation 15 days after cutting; (b) adventitious root appears 50 days after cutting; (c) root growth at 60 days after cutting; (d) root growth at 90 days after cutting.
Figure 2Effects of different hormone combinations of leaf cuttings taken from Chinese fir clones. Treatment numbers 1–16 are shown on the x-axis, and values for the three different clones are represented by the three different colored columns. (a) Callus initiation rates; (b) rooting rates; (c) root length; (d) bud germination rates; (e) plantlet formation rates. Different lowercase letters above the columns indicate significant difference between treatments for the same clone (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant difference between clones under the same treatment (p < 0.05). Values are means and the error bars represent standard error.
Range analysis of L16(4)4 test results for callus initiation rate.
| Variables | Clone no. 4 | Clone no. 6 | Clone no. 7 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
|
| 63.90 |
| 73.33 | 72.50 | 59.17 |
| 70.83 | 73.33 | 70.00 |
| 70.28 | 73.89 |
|
| 71.93 | 70.83 | 65.83 |
| 66.94 | 67.22 | 61.11 |
| 71.39 | 71.67 | 66.67 |
|
|
| 70.27 | 67.49 |
| 65.55 | 68.61 | 64.72 |
| 61.11 | 68.33 | 65.83 |
| 66.11 |
|
|
| 65.28 | 63.07 | 62.22 |
| 63.89 | 59.72 | 58.61 |
| 71.39 | 65.28 | 66.95 |
|
| 8.04 | 9.17 | 12.76 | 15.56 | 13.06 | 7.22 | 15.56 | 15.28 | 4.72 | 8.06 | 15.28 | 9.72 |
| Optimal level | A4 | B1 | C3 | D2 | A4 | B1 | C3 | D2 | A4 | B1 | C3 | D2 |
The optimal level is in bold.
Range analysis of L16(4)4 test results for rooting rate.
| Variables | Clone no. 4 | Clone no. 6 | Clone no. 7 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
|
| 19.72 | 8.89 | 16.94 | 9.72 | 20.83 | 12.22 | 18.89 | 11.39 |
| 11.94 | 19.17 | 11.11 |
|
|
|
| 12.78 | 17.50 |
|
| 15.56 | 19.72 | 21.39 |
| 13.33 | 22.78 |
|
| 10.00 | 12.50 |
| 11.39 | 11.39 | 14.17 |
| 13.89 | 10.00 | 12.78 |
| 12.50 |
|
| 13.06 | 19.72 | 16.11 |
| 15.83 | 20.83 | 16.94 |
| 16.11 | 21.39 | 17.22 |
|
|
| 10.55 | 13.33 | 4.72 | 15.00 | 11.11 | 9.17 | 3.61 | 14.17 | 12.50 | 11.95 | 6.95 | 11.67 |
| Optimal level | A2 | B2 | C3 | D4 | A2 | B2 | C3 | D4 | A1 | B2 | C3 | D4 |
The optimal level is in bold.
Range analysis of L16(4)4 test results for root length.
| Variables | Clone no. 4 | Clone no. 6 | Clone no. 7 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
|
| 2.23 | 2.22 | 2.05 | 2.07 | 1.91 | 1.82 | 2.18 | 1.89 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 2.41 | 2.22 |
|
| 1.63 | 1.95 |
| 1.85 | 1.68 | 1.91 |
| 1.84 | 1.93 | 2.19 |
| 1.88 |
|
|
|
| 2.27 | 1.78 |
|
| 2.25 | 2.20 |
| 2.51 | 2.21 | 2.42 |
|
| 1.87 | 2.05 | 1.77 |
| 2.09 | 2.36 | 1.73 |
| 2.13 |
| 1.87 |
|
|
| 1.18 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 1.06 | 1.28 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 0.87 | 1.11 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| Optimal level | A3 | B3 | C2 | D4 | A3 | B3 | C2 | D4 | A3 | B4 | C2 | D4 |
The optimal level is in bold.
Figure 3Axillarybudand seedling growth in a leaf cutting from Chinese fir. (a) Axillary bud appears 60 days after cutting; (b) plantlet development 90 days after cutting.
Range analysis of L16(4)4 test results for bud germination rate.
| Variables | Clone no. 4 | Clone no. 6 | Clone no. 7 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
|
| 25.00 | 39.72 |
| 29.17 | 25.00 | 39.72 |
| 31.67 | 23.06 |
| 35.28 | 31.39 |
|
| 25.83 |
| 31.11 | 31.11 | 26.39 |
| 31.11 | 31.67 | 28.33 | 40.83 | 29.17 | 31.11 |
|
| 33.61 | 24.72 | 33.06 | 27.22 | 36.67 | 26.95 | 35.00 | 28.89 | 37.78 | 28.33 |
| 28.89 |
|
|
| 14.44 | 24.72 |
|
| 18.61 | 25.56 |
|
| 17.50 | 27.22 |
|
|
| 12.78 | 28.89 | 9.17 | 7.50 | 15.00 | 24.17 | 10.83 | 6.94 | 16.11 | 24.17 | 9.44 | 8.06 |
| Optimal level | A4 | B2 | C1 | D4 | A4 | B2 | C1 | D4 | A4 | B1 | C3 | D4 |
The optimal level is in bold.
Range analysis of L16(4)4 test results for plantlet formation rate.
| Variables | Clone no. 4 | Clone no. 6 | Clone no. 7 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
|
| 7.22 | 5.83 |
| 7.78 | 7.22 | 6.67 |
| 7.50 | 12.78 | 11.11 |
| 12.78 |
|
|
|
| 9.17 | 8.61 | 9.17 |
| 10.28 |
|
|
| 14.17 |
|
|
| 4.72 | 6.67 | 6.39 | 6.39 | 5.55 | 5.56 | 4.17 | 6.94 | 11.67 | 11.95 | 12.78 | 13.33 |
|
| 10.83 | 5.00 | 5.83 |
|
| 5.55 | 6.39 | 8.89 | 15.28 | 10.00 | 11.67 | 13.61 |
|
| 7.50 | 12.50 | 7.78 | 5.84 | 3.89 | 9.72 | 8.06 | 2.78 | 4.45 | 12.78 | 5.56 | 3.33 |
| Optimal level | A2 | B2 | C1 | D4 | A4 | B2 | C1 | D2 | A2 | B2 | C1 | D2 |
The optimal level is in bold.
Figure 4Light microscopy images of rooting from a leaf cutting taken from Chinese fir at 400× magnification. (a) Leaf segment before cutting from the mother plant; (b) primordial root originating from calli 40 days after cutting; (c) expansion and extension of primordial cells and peninsula tissues in callus initiation 50 days after cutting.