Literature DB >> 28698291

Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Improves the Hemodynamic Results of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Adnan K Chhatriwalla1, Keith B Allen2, John T Saxon2, David J Cohen2, Sanjeev Aggarwal2, Anthony J Hart2, Suzanne J Baron2, Danny Dvir2, A Michael Borkon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be less effective in small surgical valves because of patient/prosthesis mismatch. Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) using a high-pressure balloon can be performed to facilitate VIV TAVR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We report data from 20 consecutive clinical cases in which BVF was successfully performed before or after VIV TAVR by inflation of a high-pressure balloon positioned across the valve ring during rapid ventricular pacing. Hemodynamic measurements and calculation of the valve effective orifice area were performed at baseline, immediately after VIV TAVR, and after BVF. BVF was successfully performed in 20 patients undergoing VIV TAVR with balloon-expandable (n=8) or self-expanding (n=12) transcatheter valves in Mitroflow, Carpentier-Edwards Perimount, Magna and Magna Ease, Biocor Epic and Biocor Epic Supra, and Mosaic surgical valves. Successful fracture was noted fluoroscopically when the waist of the balloon released and by a sudden drop in inflation pressure, often accompanied by an audible snap. BVF resulted in a reduction in the mean transvalvular gradient (from 20.5±7.4 to 6.7±3.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and an increase in valve effective orifice area (from 1.0±0.4 to 1.8±0.6 cm2, P<0.001). No procedural complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: BVF can be performed safely in small surgical valves to facilitate VIV TAVR with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding transcatheter valves and results in reduced residual transvalvular gradients and increased valve effective orifice area.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; bioprosthesis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698291     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  26 in total

1.  Transcatheter Laceration of Aortic Leaflets to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Concept to First-in-Human.

Authors:  Jaffar M Khan; Danny Dvir; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Toby Rogers; Gabriel Aldea; Mark Reisman; G Burkhard Mackensen; Marvin H K Eng; Gaetano Paone; Dee Dee Wang; Robert A Guyton; Chandan M Devireddy; William H Schenke; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 2.  Preventing Coronary Obstruction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From Computed Tomography to BASILICA.

Authors:  Robert J Lederman; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Toby Rogers; Jaffar M Khan; Norihiko Kamioka; Danny Dvir; Adam B Greenbaum
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 3.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated surgical bioprostheses.

Authors:  Dale J Murdoch; John G Webb
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Is Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Beneficial for Patients with Larger Surgical Valves Undergoing Valve in Valve TAVR?

Authors:  Adnan K Chhatriwalla; John T Saxon; David J Cohen; Keith B Allen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  The BASILICA Trial: Prospective Multicenter Investigation of Intentional Leaflet Laceration to Prevent TAVR Coronary Obstruction.

Authors:  Jaffar M Khan; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Toby Rogers; Marvin H Eng; Gaetano Paone; Bradley G Leshnower; Mark Reisman; Lowell Satler; Ron Waksman; Marcus Y Chen; Annette M Stine; Xin Tian; Danny Dvir; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve TAVR: Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  John T Saxon; Keith B Allen; David J Cohen; Adnan K Chhatriwalla
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-01

7.  Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.

Authors:  Sameer A Hirji; Edward D Percy; Cheryl K Zogg; Alexandra Malarczyk; Morgan T Harloff; Farhang Yazdchi; Tsuyoshi Kaneko
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  3D Printing Applications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Dmitry Levin; G Burkhard Mackensen; Mark Reisman; James M McCabe; Danny Dvir; Beth Ripley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Technical pitfalls and tips for the valve-in-valve procedure.

Authors:  Vinayak Bapat
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

10.  Reoperative Mitral Surgery Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aditya Sengupta; Farhang Yazdchi; Sophia L Alexis; Edward Percy; Akash Premkumar; Sameer Hirji; Vinayak N Bapat; Deepak L Bhatt; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Gilbert H L Tang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.