Literature DB >> 28698184

The Association of Mammographic Density and Molecular Breast Cancer Subtype.

Brandy L Edwards1, Kristen A Atkins2, George J Stukenborg3, Wendy M Novicoff3, Krista N Larson4, Wendy F Cohn3, Jennifer A Harvey5, Anneke T Schroen6,3.   

Abstract

Background: Mammographic density (MD) is associated with increased breast cancer risk, yet limited data exist on an association between MD and breast cancer molecular subtypes.
Methods: Women ages 18 years and older with breast cancer and available mammograms between 2003 and 2012 were enrolled in a larger study on MD. MD was classified by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification and by volumetric breast percent density (Volpara Solutions). Subtype was assigned by hormone receptor status, tumor grade, and mitotic score (MS). Subtypes included: Luminal-A (ER/PR+ and grade = 1; ER/PR+ and grade = 2 and MS = 1; ER+/PR- and grade = 1; n = 233); Luminal-B (ER+ and grade = 3 or MS = 3; ER+/PR- and grade = 2; ER/PR+ and grade = 2 and MS = 2; n = 79); Her-2-neu+ (H2P; n = 59); triple-negative (ER/PR-, Her-2-; n = 86). Precancer factors including age, race, body mass index (kg/m2), family history of breast cancer, and history of lobular carcinoma in situ were analyzed.
Results: A total of 604 patients had invasive cancer; 457 had sufficient information for analysis. Women with H2P tumors were younger (P = 0.011) and had the highest volumetric percent density (P = 0.002) among subgroups. Multinomial logistic regression (LA = reference) demonstrated that although quantitative MD does not significantly differentiate between all subtypes (P = 0.123), the association between MD and H2P tumors is significant (OR = 1.06; confidence interval, 1.01-1.12). This association was not seen using BI-RADS classification in bivariable analysis but was statistically significant (P = 0.047) when controlling for other precancer factors.Conclusions: Increased MD is more strongly associated with H2P tumors when compared with LA.Impact: Delineating risk factors specific to breast cancer subtype may promote development of individualized risk prediction models and screening strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(10); 1487-92. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698184     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer "intrinsic" molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Geffen Kleinstern; Christopher G Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Matthew R Jensen; V Shane Pankratz; Kimberly A Bertrand; Aaron D Norman; Daniel W Visscher; Fergus J Couch; Kathleen Brandt; John Shepherd; Fang-Fang Wu; Yunn-Yi Chen; Steven R Cummings; Stacey Winham; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Quantitative Mammographic Density Measurements and Molecular Subtypes in Chinese Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Tian; Jennifer L Guida; Hela Koka; Er-Ni Li; Bin Zhu; Hyuna Sung; Ariane Chan; Han Zhang; Eric Tang; Changyuan Guo; Joseph Deng; Nan Hu; Ning Lu; Gretchen L Gierach; Jing Li; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Volumetric breast density and risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode: a cohort study.

Authors:  Donella Puliti; Marco Zappa; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Elena Pierpaoli; Gianfranco Manneschi; Daniela Ambrogetti; Leonardo Ventura; Paola Mantellini
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Clinical and epidemiologic factors associated with breast cancer and its subtypes among Northeast Chinese women.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Qiang Li; Tao Yu; Hao-Tian Wang; Ya-Hong Luo; Wen-Qing Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.