Literature DB >> 28697941

Early outcomes of the conformable stent graft for acute complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.

Ting Zhu1, Yi Si1, Yuan Fang1, Bin Chen1, Jue Yang1, Junhao Jiang1, Jianing Yue1, Weiguo Fu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of the conformable thoracic endograft (Conformable TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis [CTAG]; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) for acute complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD).
METHODS: Between February and October 2016, 52 consecutive patients with acute complicated or uncomplicated TBAD were treated with a CTAG device. We assessed safety, complications, and device conformability using intraoperative angiography and computed tomography angiography. The mean follow-up period was 8.2 ± 3.5 months (range, 4-12 months).
RESULTS: All patients survived through the follow-up period. No endoleaks, retrograde aortic dissection, distal new entry tear, stroke, or paraplegia was observed postoperatively. Two patients (3.8%) experienced minor wound hematomas without further treatment. Eleven patients (21.2%) underwent a chimney technique to rebuild supra-arch vessels. A bird-beak configuration was observed in seven (13.5%) patients, five of whom underwent a chimney technique. Analysis of aortic remodeling showed that the minimal true lumen area significantly increased in both complicated and uncomplicated acute TBAD (P < .001 and P = .047, respectively). Likewise, the maximal false lumen area significantly decreased in uncomplicated dissection (P = .006), but no change in maximal false lumen area was detected in complicated dissection (P = .32).
CONCLUSIONS: Early outcomes indicate that the CTAG device provides reliable clinical effectiveness and excellent conformability in treating acute complicated and uncomplicated TBAD without risk of major complications. Studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to evaluate longer term outcomes.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28697941     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Endovascular repair or best medical treatment: what is the optimal management of uncomplicated Type-B acute aortic dissection?

Authors:  María Elena Arnáiz-García; José María González-Santos; Ana María Arnáiz-García; Javier Arnáiz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Equations for Estimating the Predissected Diameter of the Descending Aorta From Computed Tomographic Images at the Onset of Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Takafumi Masai; Hiroshi Takano; Yukitoshi Shirakawa; Koichi Toda; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Case of rapid aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for retrograde type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yuta Kikuchi; Masahiro Tsutsui; Kohei Ishido; Masahiko Narita; Ryohei Ushioda; Tomonori Shirasaka; Natsuya Ishikawa; Hiroyuki Kamiya
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-01

4.  Research and clinical translation of trilayer stent-graft of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for interventional treatment of aortic dissection.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Caiyun Gao; Benhao Xiao; Jie Zhang; Xunyuan Jiang; Qunsong Wang; Jingzhen Guo; Deyuan Zhang; Jianxiong Liu; Yuehui Xie; Chang Shu; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Identification of geometric and mechanical factors predictive of bird-beak configuration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair using computational models of stent graft deployment.

Authors:  Negin Shahbazian; David A Romero; Thomas L Forbes; Cristina H Amon
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2022-06-24

6.  Correlation between Sex and Prognosis of Acute Aortic Dissection in the Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Liu; Xiao-Zeng Wang; Ya Wang; Rui-Xia He; Lin Yang; Quan-Min Jing; Hai-Wei Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.