Kaichuang Ye1, Huihua Shi1, Jinbao Qin1, Minyi Yin1, Xiaobing Liu1, Weimin Li1, Mi'er Jiang1, Xinwu Lu2. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, and Vascular Center of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, and Vascular Center of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: luxinwu@aliyun.com.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the outcomes of endovascular recanalization (ER) vs autogenous venous bypass (AVB) for tibioperoneal arterial occlusion in thromboangiitis obliterans patients with critical lower limb ischemia. METHODS: A total of 90 limbs in 75 patients, successfully treated with ER (ER group, 35 patients, 43 limbs) and AVB (AVB group, 40 patients, 47 limbs) for tibioperoneal arterial occlusions from January 2009 to December 2015 in a single institution, were retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the amputation-free survival rate during follow-up; the secondary outcomes were patency rates, immediate failure, periprocedural complications, and rates of reintervention. Univariate and multivariate analysis to identify potentially significant predictors of amputation-free survival and primary patency in the whole study group was performed. RESULTS: Not all patients in the ER group were bypass candidates because of unavailable runoff arteries or adequate conduit for bypass. Other baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the ER group had a much higher incidence of immediate failure (36.36% in femoropopliteal segment and 65.52% in tibioperoneal segment vs 14.89% in AVB bypass; P = .03 and < .001). Although patients in the ER group had a significantly higher rate of reintervention (62.79% vs 27.66%; P < .001) associated with a significantly lower primary patency rate (18.96% in femoropopliteal segment and 14.37% in tibioperoneal segment vs 60.41% in AVB bypass; P = .008 and < .001) and secondary patency rate (33.85% in femoropopliteal segment and 21.29% in tibioperoneal segment vs 68.78% in AVB bypass; P = .04 and .002) at 3 years, the amputation-free survival in the ER group and AVB group was similar at 1 year (92.9% vs 93.2%; P = .81) and 3 years (87.8% and 90.6%; P = .66). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the presence of gangrene was independently associated with major amputation (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.3; P = .02); however, the presence of active ulcer was the only risk factor for poorer primary patency during follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-5.6; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: ER is a valid strategy for limb salvage in thromboangiitis obliterans patients who are unsuitable for bypass, contributing an acceptable amputation-free survival as high as with AVB, even though it is associated with lower patency rates and a higher rate of reintervention.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the outcomes of endovascular recanalization (ER) vs autogenous venous bypass (AVB) for tibioperoneal arterial occlusion in thromboangiitis obliteranspatients with critical lower limb ischemia. METHODS: A total of 90 limbs in 75 patients, successfully treated with ER (ER group, 35 patients, 43 limbs) and AVB (AVB group, 40 patients, 47 limbs) for tibioperoneal arterial occlusions from January 2009 to December 2015 in a single institution, were retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the amputation-free survival rate during follow-up; the secondary outcomes were patency rates, immediate failure, periprocedural complications, and rates of reintervention. Univariate and multivariate analysis to identify potentially significant predictors of amputation-free survival and primary patency in the whole study group was performed. RESULTS: Not all patients in the ER group were bypass candidates because of unavailable runoff arteries or adequate conduit for bypass. Other baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the ER group had a much higher incidence of immediate failure (36.36% in femoropopliteal segment and 65.52% in tibioperoneal segment vs 14.89% in AVB bypass; P = .03 and < .001). Although patients in the ER group had a significantly higher rate of reintervention (62.79% vs 27.66%; P < .001) associated with a significantly lower primary patency rate (18.96% in femoropopliteal segment and 14.37% in tibioperoneal segment vs 60.41% in AVB bypass; P = .008 and < .001) and secondary patency rate (33.85% in femoropopliteal segment and 21.29% in tibioperoneal segment vs 68.78% in AVB bypass; P = .04 and .002) at 3 years, the amputation-free survival in the ER group and AVB group was similar at 1 year (92.9% vs 93.2%; P = .81) and 3 years (87.8% and 90.6%; P = .66). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the presence of gangrene was independently associated with major amputation (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.3; P = .02); however, the presence of active ulcer was the only risk factor for poorer primary patency during follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-5.6; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: ER is a valid strategy for limb salvage in thromboangiitis obliteranspatients who are unsuitable for bypass, contributing an acceptable amputation-free survival as high as with AVB, even though it is associated with lower patency rates and a higher rate of reintervention.