| Literature DB >> 28697585 |
Aneta K Urbanek1, Waldemar Rymowicz1, Mateusz C Strzelecki2, Waldemar Kociuba3, Łukasz Franczak3, Aleksandra M Mirończuk4.
Abstract
The increasing amount of plastic waste causes significant environmental pollution. In this study, screening of Arctic microorganisms which are able to degrade bioplastics was performed. In total, 313 microorganisms were isolated from 52 soil samples from the Arctic region (Spitsbergen). Among the isolated microorganisms, 121 (38.66%) showed biodegradation activity. The ability of clear zone formation on emulsified poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) (PBSA) was observed for 116 microorganisms (95.87%), on poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) for 73 microorganisms (60.33%), and on poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) for 102 microorganisms (84.3%). Moreover, the growth of microorganisms on poly(lactic acid) (PLA) agar plates was observed for 56 microorganisms (46.28%). Based on the 16S rRNA sequence, 10 bacterial strains which showed the highest ability for biodegradation were identified as species belonging to Pseudomonas sp. and Rhodococcus sp. The isolated fungal strains were tested for polycaprolactone films and commercial corn and potato starch bags degradation under laboratory conditions. Strains 16G (based on the analysis of a partial 18S rRNA sequence, identified as Clonostachys rosea) and 16H (identified as Trichoderma sp.) showed the highest capability for biodegradation. A particularly high capability for biodegradation was observed for the strain Clonostachys rosea, which showed 100% degradation of starch films and 52.91% degradation of PCL films in a 30-day shake flask experiment. The main advantage of the microorganisms isolated from Arctic environment is the ability to grow at low temperature and efficient biodegradation under this condition. The data suggest that C. rosea can be used in natural and laboratory conditions for degradations of bioplastics.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic microorganisms; Biodegradable plastics (BP); Biodegradation; Microbial degradation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28697585 PMCID: PMC5503855 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-017-0448-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Microorganisms able to biodegradation process isolated from Spitsbergen soil samples
| No. | Strain | Similarity (%) | Species | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2B | 96 |
| MF034061 |
| 2. | 4A | 98 |
| MF034062 |
| 3. | 5D | 96 |
| MF034063 |
| G4. | 23B | 97 |
| MF034064 |
| 5. | 28E | 97 |
| MF034065 |
| 6. | 31A | 98 |
| MF034066 |
| 7. | 31C | 96 |
| MF034067 |
| 8. | 33C | 99 |
| MF034068 |
| 9. | 42C | 94 |
| MF034069 |
| 10. | 42D | 96 |
| MF034070 |
| 11. | 42E | 96 |
| MF034071 |
| 12. | 52G | 96 |
| MF034072 |
| 13. | 16G | 99 |
| MF034074 |
| 14. | 16H | 99 |
| MF034074 |
Fig. 1Example of an initial test of biodegradability
Microorganisms degrading plastics: PBS, PBSA, PCL and PLA
| Microorganism | PBSA | PBS | PCL | PLAa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| Bacteria | 106 | 93.81 | 65 | 57.52 | 94 | 83.19 | 51 | 45.13 |
| Fungi | 10 | 90.91 | 8 | 72.73 | 8 | 72.73 | 6 | 54.55 |
aMeasured growth of microorganisms. Clear zones were not observed
Fig. 2Comparison of clear zones of the same microorganisms on medium containing 0.1% PBSA (a), 0.1% PCL (b), 0.1% PBS (c)
Fig. 3Agar plate test for fungi
Summary of biodegradability of filamentous fungi after 30 days liquid culture method in 28 °C
| Starch film | PCL film | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Strain | % | Strain | % |
| 16H | 12.07 | 16H | 21.54 |
| 16G | 100a | 16G | 52.91 |
| 16Gb | 65.00 | 16Gb | 34.50 |
The weight loss of film fragments expressed in % (w/w)
aDecomposed after 16 days of growth
bLiquid culture conducted at 20 °C
Fig. 4PCL (a) and starch (b) films at the end of cultivation at 20 °C by 16G
Fig. 5PCL films at the end of cultivation at 20 °C by C. rosea 16G. The films were viewed by scanning electron microscopy at a 40 magnification (a, b) and at a 2000 magnification (c, d), as described in “Materials and Methods”. a, c The control; b, d C. rosea
Fig. 6Starch films at the end of cultivation at 20 °C by C. rosea 16G. The films were viewed by scanning electron microscopy at a 40 magnification (a, b) and at a 2000 magnification (c, d), as described in “Materials and Methods”. a, c The control; b, d C. rosea