Literature DB >> 28697325

Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: the fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins.

Marilyn Crawshaw1.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of donor-conceived individuals (and/or parents) are seeking individuals genetically related through donor conception. One route is through 'direct-to-consumer' (DTC) DNA testing, prompting calls for fertility services to alert donors and prospective parents to the increasing unsustainability of anonymity and secrecy. The complexity of interpreting DNA results in this context has also been discussed, including their lack of absolute certainty, as has the need for professional and peer support. This commentary highlights a different 'threat', from individuals learning of their donor-conception origins through the use of such tests by themselves or relatives for such purposes as genealogy or health checks. It illustrates the personal complexities faced by three older women and their families on learning not only of their genetic relationship to each other but also to 15 more donor-related siblings. DTC DNA services are a growing feature of modern life. This commentary raises ethical questions about their responsibilities towards those inadvertently learning of donor conception origins and the responsibilities of fertility services to inform prospective parents and donors of this new phenomenon. Considerations of how and when parents should tell their children of their donor-conception origins here instead become how and when children should inform their parents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA; Donor-assisted conception; ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28697325     DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)        ISSN: 1464-7273            Impact factor:   2.767


  10 in total

1.  Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Grayson L Ruhl; James W Hazel; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Kirby Adlam; Alana D Steffen; Martha Driessnack; Harold D Grotevant; Susan C Klock; Lauri Pasch; Valerie Gruss
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-07-31

3.  Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Jill O Robinson; Cinnamon C Bloss; Whitney Bash Brooks; Stephanie M Fullerton; Brianne Kirkpatrick; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Mary Majumder; Stacey Pereira; Olivia Schuman; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 11.043

4.  Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions.

Authors:  Jane Tiller; Paul Lacaze
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-15

5.  'Genes versus children': if the goal is parenthood, are we using the optimal approach?

Authors:  Jackson C Kirkman-Brown; Mariana V Martins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Prospective users' attitudes toward information about ancestry and biological relationships.

Authors:  James W Hazel; Catherine Hammack-Aviran; Kathleen M Brelsford; Bradley A Malin; Laura M Beskow; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Authors:  Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Eline A F Dancet; Kersti Lundin; Mariana Martins; Kelly Tilleman; Petra Thorn; Nathalie Vermeulen; Lucy Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 8.  Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Iñigo de Miguel Beriain
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Co-designing genomics research with a large group of donor-conceived siblings.

Authors:  Jack S Nunn; Marilyn Crawshaw; Paul Lacaze
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-12-16

10.  Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.

Authors:  Zhijun Yin; Lijun Song; Ellen W Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.