Literature DB >> 28697055

Development and Assessment of Pictorial Guide for Improved Accuracy of Visual Blood Loss Estimation in Cesarean Delivery.

Brittany E Homcha1, Elbert J Mets, Michael D F Goldenberg, Lan Kong, Sonia J Vaida.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Estimated blood loss for surgical procedures performed via visual estimation is known to be an inaccurate method. Blood loss estimation is further complicated during cesarean delivery (CD) by a large volume loss for a short period as well as the presence of amniotic fluid. We hypothesized that a pictorial guide depicting premeasured blood volumes and materials commonly used in a CD would improve clinician accuracy in estimated blood loss.
METHODS: A simulated CD scene was used to assess the ability of clinicians to estimate the amount of blood lost by a CD patient. Accuracy of the estimates was assessed before and after they had access to the pictorial guide created for the study.
RESULTS: Before the intervention, 52% of participants estimated more than 25% above or below actual blood loss volume. With use of the guide, clinicians became more accurate at blood loss estimation. After the intervention, the number of participants estimating within 5% of the actual volume increased from 7% before to 24% (P = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: An institution-specific pictorial guide is effective at improving the accuracy of visual blood loss estimation in a simulation and may help improve clinical care in CD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28697055     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  3 in total

1.  Blood Loss Estimation in Small Animals and Assessment of a Pictorial Tool to Improve Accuracy in a Global Population of Veterinary Anesthesia Staff.

Authors:  Scott H Cumming; Fernando Martinez-Taboada
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-07

2.  Do we visually estimate intra-operative blood loss better with white or green sponges and is the deviation from the real blood loss clinically acceptable? Results from a simulated scenario study.

Authors:  Florian Piekarski; Lara Gerdessen; Elke Schmitt; Linda Tanner; Florian Wunderer; Vanessa Neef; Patrick Meybohm; Kai Zacharowski; Florian Jürgen Raimann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lara Gerdessen; Patrick Meybohm; Suma Choorapoikayil; Eva Herrmann; Isabel Taeuber; Vanessa Neef; Florian J Raimann; Kai Zacharowski; Florian Piekarski
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.