Literature DB >> 28697037

The association of surgical versus natural menopause with future left ventricular structure and function: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Duke Appiah1, Pamela J Schreiner, Chike C Nwabuo, Melissa F Wellons, Cora E Lewis, Joao A Lima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between surgical menopause (SM) versus natural menopause (NM) in relation to later left ventricular (LV) structure and function, while taking into account the LV parameters and other cardiovascular disease risk factor (CVDRF) levels that predate the menopausal transition.
METHODS: We studied 825 premenopausal women from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study in 1990 to 1991 (baseline, mean age 32 years) who later reached menopause by 2010 to 2011 and had echocardiograms at these two time points.
RESULTS: During 20 years of follow-up, 508 women reached NM, whereas 317 underwent SM (34% had bilateral oophorectomy). At baseline, women who later underwent SM were more likely to be black, younger, have greater parity, and higher mean values of systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and also lower mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and physical activity than women who reached NM. No significant differences in LV structure/function were found between groups. In 2010 to 2011, SM women had significantly higher LV mass, LV mass/volume ratio, E/e' ratio, and impaired longitudinal and circumferential strain than NM women. SM women with bilateral oophorectomy had adverse LV measures than women with hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Controlling for baseline echocardiographic parameters and CVDRF in linear regression models eliminated these differences between groups. Further adjustment for age at menopause/surgery and hormone therapy use did not change these results.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the adverse LV structure and function observed among women with SM compared with NM were explained by their unfavorable presurgical CVDRF profiles, suggesting that premenopausal CVDRF rather than gynecologic surgery predispose SM women to elevated future cardiovascular disease risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28697037      PMCID: PMC5659880          DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   3.310


  41 in total

1.  Arterial imaging outcomes and cardiovascular risk factors in recently menopausal women: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Mitchell Harman; Dennis M Black; Frederick Naftolin; Eliot A Brinton; Matthew J Budoff; Marcelle I Cedars; Paul N Hopkins; Rogerio A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; George R Merriam; Virginia M Miller; Genevieve Neal-Perry; Nanette Santoro; Hugh S Taylor; Eric Vittinghoff; Mingzhu Yan; Howard N Hodis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Cardiovascular risk factors and diseases in women undergoing hysterectomy with ovarian conservation.

Authors:  Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Zaraq Khan; Amy L Weaver; Cathy D Schleck; Walter A Rocca; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Role of estrogen in diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Zhuo Zhao; Hao Wang; Jewell A Jessup; Sarah H Lindsey; Mark C Chappell; Leanne Groban
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure.

Authors:  Garvan C Kane; Barry L Karon; Douglas W Mahoney; Margaret M Redfield; Veronique L Roger; John C Burnett; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis: The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience.

Authors:  Anderson C Armstrong; Erin P Ricketts; Christopher Cox; Paul Adler; Alexander Arynchyn; Kiang Liu; Ellen Stengel; Stephen Sidney; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; James M Shikany; Kimberly Keck; Jamie Merlo; Samuel S Gidding; João A C Lima
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.724

6.  Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and endogenous sex hormone levels in older women: the Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  G A Laughlin; E Barrett-Connor; D Kritz-Silverstein; D von Mühlen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction: from risk factors to overt heart failure.

Authors:  Tatiana Kuznetsova; Lieven Herbots; Yu Jin; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2010-02

8.  Longitudinal determinants of left ventricular mass and geometry: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Samuel S Gidding; Kiang Liu; Laura A Colangelo; Nakela L Cook; David C Goff; Stephen P Glasser; Julius M Gardin; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 9.  Menopause and cardiovascular disease: the evidence.

Authors:  G M C Rosano; C Vitale; G Marazzi; M Volterrani
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.005

10.  Validation of self-reported history of hysterectomy and oophorectomy among women in an integrated group practice setting.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  6 in total

1.  Long-term cumulative blood pressure in young adults and incident heart failure, coronary heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: The CARDIA study.

Authors:  Chike C Nwabuo; Duke Appiah; Henrique T Moreira; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Yuichiro Yano; Jared P Reis; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Norrina B Allen; Stephen Sidney; Paul Muntner; Cora E Lewis; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Pamela J Schreiner; Samuel S Gidding; João A C Lima
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 7.804

2.  The association of age at natural menopause with pre- to postmenopausal changes in left ventricular structure and function: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Authors:  Duke Appiah; Chike C Nwabuo; Imo A Ebong; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Melissa F Wellons; Cora E Lewis; Joao A Lima; Pamela J Schreiner
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.310

Review 3.  Special Considerations in the Care of Women With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Imo A Ebong; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Eman A Hamad; Eileen M Hsich; Varinder K Randhawa; Filio Billia; Mahwash Kassi; Anju Bhardwaj; Mirnela Byku; Mrudala R Munagala; Roopa A Rao; Amy E Hackmann; Claudia G Gidea; Teresa DeMarco; Shelley A Hall
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  Age-Related Development of Cardiac Remodeling and Dysfunction in Young Black and White Adults: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.

Authors:  Amanda M Perak; Sadiya S Khan; Laura A Colangelo; Samuel S Gidding; Anderson C Armstrong; Cora E Lewis; Jared P Reis; Pamela J Schreiner; Stephen Sidney; Joao A C Lima; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 5.  The Coronary Artery Risk Development In Young Adults (CARDIA) Study: JACC Focus Seminar 8/8.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; James M Shikany; Stephen Sidney; Jared P Reis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 27.203

Review 6.  The many menopauses: searching the cognitive research literature for menopause types.

Authors:  Hannaford Edwards; Annie Duchesne; April S Au; Gillian Einstein
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.