Duke Appiah1, Pamela J Schreiner, Chike C Nwabuo, Melissa F Wellons, Cora E Lewis, Joao A Lima. 1. 1Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Abilene, TX 2Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 4Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 5Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between surgical menopause (SM) versus natural menopause (NM) in relation to later left ventricular (LV) structure and function, while taking into account the LV parameters and other cardiovascular disease risk factor (CVDRF) levels that predate the menopausal transition. METHODS: We studied 825 premenopausal women from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study in 1990 to 1991 (baseline, mean age 32 years) who later reached menopause by 2010 to 2011 and had echocardiograms at these two time points. RESULTS: During 20 years of follow-up, 508 women reached NM, whereas 317 underwent SM (34% had bilateral oophorectomy). At baseline, women who later underwent SM were more likely to be black, younger, have greater parity, and higher mean values of systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and also lower mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and physical activity than women who reached NM. No significant differences in LV structure/function were found between groups. In 2010 to 2011, SM women had significantly higher LV mass, LV mass/volume ratio, E/e' ratio, and impaired longitudinal and circumferential strain than NM women. SM women with bilateral oophorectomy had adverse LV measures than women with hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Controlling for baseline echocardiographic parameters and CVDRF in linear regression models eliminated these differences between groups. Further adjustment for age at menopause/surgery and hormone therapy use did not change these results. CONCLUSION: In this study, the adverse LV structure and function observed among women with SM compared with NM were explained by their unfavorable presurgical CVDRF profiles, suggesting that premenopausal CVDRF rather than gynecologic surgery predispose SM women to elevated future cardiovascular disease risk.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between surgical menopause (SM) versus natural menopause (NM) in relation to later left ventricular (LV) structure and function, while taking into account the LV parameters and other cardiovascular disease risk factor (CVDRF) levels that predate the menopausal transition. METHODS: We studied 825 premenopausal women from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study in 1990 to 1991 (baseline, mean age 32 years) who later reached menopause by 2010 to 2011 and had echocardiograms at these two time points. RESULTS: During 20 years of follow-up, 508 women reached NM, whereas 317 underwent SM (34% had bilateral oophorectomy). At baseline, women who later underwent SM were more likely to be black, younger, have greater parity, and higher mean values of systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and also lower mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and physical activity than women who reached NM. No significant differences in LV structure/function were found between groups. In 2010 to 2011, SM women had significantly higher LV mass, LV mass/volume ratio, E/e' ratio, and impaired longitudinal and circumferential strain than NM women. SM women with bilateral oophorectomy had adverse LV measures than women with hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Controlling for baseline echocardiographic parameters and CVDRF in linear regression models eliminated these differences between groups. Further adjustment for age at menopause/surgery and hormone therapy use did not change these results. CONCLUSION: In this study, the adverse LV structure and function observed among women with SM compared with NM were explained by their unfavorable presurgical CVDRF profiles, suggesting that premenopausal CVDRF rather than gynecologic surgery predispose SM women to elevated future cardiovascular disease risk.
Authors: S Mitchell Harman; Dennis M Black; Frederick Naftolin; Eliot A Brinton; Matthew J Budoff; Marcelle I Cedars; Paul N Hopkins; Rogerio A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; George R Merriam; Virginia M Miller; Genevieve Neal-Perry; Nanette Santoro; Hugh S Taylor; Eric Vittinghoff; Mingzhu Yan; Howard N Hodis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Zaraq Khan; Amy L Weaver; Cathy D Schleck; Walter A Rocca; Elizabeth A Stewart Journal: Menopause Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Zhuo Zhao; Hao Wang; Jewell A Jessup; Sarah H Lindsey; Mark C Chappell; Leanne Groban Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Garvan C Kane; Barry L Karon; Douglas W Mahoney; Margaret M Redfield; Veronique L Roger; John C Burnett; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anderson C Armstrong; Erin P Ricketts; Christopher Cox; Paul Adler; Alexander Arynchyn; Kiang Liu; Ellen Stengel; Stephen Sidney; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; James M Shikany; Kimberly Keck; Jamie Merlo; Samuel S Gidding; João A C Lima Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2014-11-09 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Samuel S Gidding; Kiang Liu; Laura A Colangelo; Nakela L Cook; David C Goff; Stephen P Glasser; Julius M Gardin; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Chike C Nwabuo; Duke Appiah; Henrique T Moreira; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Yuichiro Yano; Jared P Reis; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Norrina B Allen; Stephen Sidney; Paul Muntner; Cora E Lewis; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Pamela J Schreiner; Samuel S Gidding; João A C Lima Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Duke Appiah; Chike C Nwabuo; Imo A Ebong; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Melissa F Wellons; Cora E Lewis; Joao A Lima; Pamela J Schreiner Journal: Menopause Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 3.310
Authors: Imo A Ebong; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Eman A Hamad; Eileen M Hsich; Varinder K Randhawa; Filio Billia; Mahwash Kassi; Anju Bhardwaj; Mirnela Byku; Mrudala R Munagala; Roopa A Rao; Amy E Hackmann; Claudia G Gidea; Teresa DeMarco; Shelley A Hall Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-11
Authors: Amanda M Perak; Sadiya S Khan; Laura A Colangelo; Samuel S Gidding; Anderson C Armstrong; Cora E Lewis; Jared P Reis; Pamela J Schreiner; Stephen Sidney; Joao A C Lima; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; James M Shikany; Stephen Sidney; Jared P Reis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 27.203