Literature DB >> 28696032

Research Review: Harnessing the power of individual participant data in a meta-analysis of the benefits and harms of the Incredible Years parenting program.

Patty Leijten1,2, Frances Gardner1, Sabine Landau3, Victoria Harris3, Joanna Mann1, Judy Hutchings4, Jennifer Beecham5,6, Eva-Maria Bonin5,6, Stephen Scott3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parenting programs aim to reduce children's conduct problems through improvement of family dynamics. To date, research on the precise benefits and possible harms of parenting programs on family well-being has been unsystematic and likely to be subject to selective outcome reporting and publication bias. Better understanding of program benefits and harms requires full disclosure by researchers of all included measures, and large enough numbers of participants to be able to detect small effects and estimate them precisely.
METHODS: We obtained individual participant data for 14 of 15 randomized controlled trials on the Incredible Years parenting program in Europe (total N = 1,799). We used multilevel modeling to estimate program effects on 13 parent-reported outcomes, including parenting practices, children's mental health, and parental mental health.
RESULTS: Parental use of praise, corporal punishment, threats, and shouting improved, while parental use of tangible rewards, monitoring, or laxness did not. Children's conduct problems and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms improved, while emotional problems did not. Parental mental health (depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, and stress) did not improve. There was no evidence of harmful effects.
CONCLUSIONS: The Incredible Years parenting program improves the aspects of family well-being that it is primarily designed to improve: parenting and children's conduct problems. It also improves parent-reported ADHD symptoms in children. Wider benefits are limited: the program does not improve children's emotional problems or parental mental health. There are no signs of harm on any of the target outcomes.
© 2017 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incredible Years; Parenting program; conduct problems; individual participant data meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28696032     DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0021-9630            Impact factor:   8.982


  22 in total

Review 1.  Conduct Disorder: Biology and Developmental Trajectories.

Authors:  Alexandra Junewicz; Stephen Bates Billick
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2020-03

2.  "Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences.

Authors:  Gráinne Hickey; Sinead McGilloway; Yvonne Leckey; Ann Stokes; Tracey Bywater; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Effects of Behavioral Treatment Modified to Fit Children with Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional (CU) Traits.

Authors:  Daniel A Waschbusch; Michael T Willoughby; Sarah M Haas; Ty Ridenour; Sarah Helseth; Kathleen I Crum; Amy R Altszuler; J Megan Ross; Erika K Coles; William E Pelham
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2019-06-05

Review 4.  Effectiveness of GenerationPMTO to Promote Parenting and Child Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Qiyue Cai; Athena C Y Chan; Sun-Kyung Lee; Scott Marsalis; Abigail H Gewirtz
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Parent Management Training Combined with Group-CBT Compared to Parent Management Training Only for Oppositional Defiant Disorder Symptoms: 2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maria Helander; Pia Enebrink; Clara Hellner; Johan Ahlen
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2022-01-28

6.  Exploring Parenting Profiles to Understand Who Benefits from the Incredible Years Parenting Program.

Authors:  Joyce Weeland; Patty Leijten; Bram Orobio de Castro; Ankie Menting; Geertjan Overbeek; Maartje Raaijmakers; Joran Jongerling; Walter Matthys
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-03-19

7.  Does Social and Economic Disadvantage Predict Lower Engagement with Parenting Interventions? An Integrative Analysis Using Individual Participant Data.

Authors:  Vashti Berry; G J Melendez-Torres; Nick Axford; Ulf Axberg; Bram Orobio de Castro; Frances Gardner; Maria Filomena Gaspar; Bjørn Helge Handegård; Judy Hutchings; Ankie Menting; Sinéad McGilloway; Stephen Scott; Patty Leijten
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-07-23

8.  Minding the Baby versus usual care: study protocol for a quasi-cluster-randomized controlled study in Denmark of an early interdisciplinary home-visiting intervention for families at increased risk for adversity.

Authors:  Maiken Pontoppidan; Mette Thorsager; Mette Friis-Hansen; Arietta Slade; Lois S Sadler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.728

9.  Caregiver-mediated interventions to support self-regulation among infants and young children (0-5 years): a protocol for a realist review.

Authors:  Amy Finlay-Jones; Jetro Emanel Ang; Elaine Bennett; Jenny Downs; Sally Kendall; Keerthi Kottampally; Sheila Krogh-Jespersen; Yi Huey Lim; Leigha A MacNeill; Vincent Mancini; Rhonda Marriott; Helen Milroy; Monique Robinson; Justin D Smith; Lauren S Wakschlag; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  A Systematic Review Focusing on Psychotherapeutic Interventions that Impact Parental Psychopathology, Child Psychopathology and Parenting Behavior.

Authors:  Yoel Everett; Christina Gamache Martin; Maureen Zalewski
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.