Literature DB >> 28695998

Co-surgeons in breast reconstructive microsurgery: What do they bring to the table?

Nicholas T Haddock1, Samar Kayfan1, Ronnie A Pezeshk1, Sumeet S Teotia1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current research within other surgical specialties suggests that a co-surgeon approach may reduce operative times and complications associated with complex bilateral procedures, possibly leading to improved patient and surgical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the role of the co-surgery team and its development in free flap breast reconstruction.
METHODS: A retrospective review of free-flap breast reconstruction by two surgeons from 2011 to 2016 was conducted. We analyzed 128 patients who underwent bilateral-DIEP breast. Surgical groups were: single-surgeon reconstruction (SSR; 35 patients), co-surgery where both surgeons are present for entire reconstruction (CSR-I; 69 patients), and co-surgery reconstruction where co-surgeons appropriately assist in two concurrent or staggered cases (CSR-II; 24 patients). Efficiency data collected was OR time and patient length-of-stay (LOS). The rate of flap-failure, return to OR, infection, wound breakdown, seroma, hematoma, and PE/DVT were compared.
RESULTS: Single-surgeon reconstruction had significantly longer OR time (678 vs. 485 min, P < .0001), LOS (5 vs. 3.9 days, P < .001), higher wound occurrences of the umbilical site that required surgical correction [11.4 percent (n = 4) vs. 1.5% (n = 1); P < .043] compared to CSR-I. Similarly, SSR had significantly longer average OR time (678 vs. 527 min P < .0001), average LOS (5 vs. 4 days, P = .0005) when compared with CSR-II. There were no total increased patient related complications associated with co-surgery (CSR-I or II).
CONCLUSION: The addition of a co-surgeon, even with concurrent surgery, reduces operative time, average patient LOS, and postoperative complications. This work lends a strong credence that co-surgery model is associated with increased operative efficiency.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28695998     DOI: 10.1002/micr.30191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  6 in total

1.  Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Constantine Tarabanis; Eric Schneider; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: Initial Experience with Simultaneous Bilateral Flaps for Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas T Haddock; Sumeet S Teotia
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-18

3.  The Impact of Combined Risk-Reducing Gynecological Surgeries on Outcomes in DIEP Flap and Tissue-Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Avinash P Jayaraman; Travis Boyd; Savannah N Hampton; Nicholas T Haddock; Sumeet S Teotia
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Efficient DIEP Flap: Bilateral Breast Reconstruction in Less Than Four Hours.

Authors:  Nicholas T Haddock; Sumeet S Teotia
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-07

5.  The impact of co-surgeons on complication rates and healthcare cost in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction: analysis of 8680 patients.

Authors:  Malke Asaad; Ying Xu; Carrie K Chu; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Alexander F Mericli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Immediate Breast Reconstruction with a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in the Lithotomy Position.

Authors:  Shihoko Tamura; Toshihiko Satake; Mayu Muto; Mai Shibuya; Kazutaka Narui; Shinji Kobayashi; Takashi Ishikawa; Jiro Maegawa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.