Literature DB >> 28695982

Combinations of genotoxic tests for the evaluation of group 1 IARC carcinogens.

Jacky Bhagat1.   

Abstract

Many of the known human carcinogens are potent genotoxins that are efficiently detected as carcinogens in human populations but certain types of compounds such as immunosuppressants, sex hormones, etc. act via non-genotoxic mechanism. The absence of genotoxicity and the diversity of modes of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens make predicting their carcinogenic potential extremely challenging. There is evidence that combinations of different short-term tests provide a better and efficient prediction of human genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. The purpose of this study is to summarize the in vivo and in vitro comet assay (CMT) results of group 1 carcinogens selected from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and to discuss the utility of the comet assay along with other genotoxic assays such as Ames, in vivo micronucleus (MN), and in vivo chromosomal aberration (CA) test. Of the 62 agents for which valid genotoxic data were available, 38 of 61 (62.3%) were Ames test positive, 42 of 60 (70%) were in vivo MN test positive and 36 of 45 (80%) were positive for the in vivo CA test. Higher sensitivity was seen in in vivo CMT (90%) and in vitro CMT (86.9%) assay. Combination of two tests has greater sensitivity than individual tests: in vivo MN + in vivo CA (88.6%); in vivo MN + in vivo CMT (92.5%); and in vivo MN + in vitro CMT (95.6%). Combinations of in vivo or in vitro CMT with other tests provided better sensitivity. In vivo CMT in combination with in vivo CA provided the highest sensitivity (96.7%).
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ames test; carcinogens; chromosomal aberration; comet assay; genotoxic test; micronucleus test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28695982     DOI: 10.1002/jat.3496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  6 in total

1.  Application of the CometChip platform to assess DNA damage in field-collected blood samples from turtles.

Authors:  Peter Sykora; Ylenia Chiari; Andrew Heaton; Nickolas Moreno; Scott Glaberman; Robert W Sobol
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 2.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 3.  Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens.

Authors:  J Chrz; B Hošíková; L Svobodová; D Očadlíková; H Kolářová; M Dvořáková; K Kejlová; L Malina; G Jírová; A Vlková; M Mannerström
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 4.  The roles of inducible chromatin and transcriptional memory in cellular defense system responses to redox-active pollutants.

Authors:  Caren Weinhouse
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 8.101

5.  Next generation high throughput DNA damage detection platform for genotoxic compound screening.

Authors:  Peter Sykora; Kristine L Witt; Pooja Revanna; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Jonathan Dismukes; Donald G Lloyd; Bevin P Engelward; Robert W Sobol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Garlic (Allium sativum L.): A Brief Review of Its Antigenotoxic Effects.

Authors:  José Antonio Morales-González; Eduardo Madrigal-Bujaidar; Manuel Sánchez-Gutiérrez; Jeannett A Izquierdo-Vega; María Del Carmen Valadez-Vega; Isela Álvarez-González; Ángel Morales-González; Eduardo Madrigal-Santillán
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.