Literature DB >> 28695706

Seasonal associations with urban light pollution for nocturnally migrating bird populations.

Frank A La Sorte1, Daniel Fink1, Jeffrey J Buler2, Andrew Farnsworth1, Sergio A Cabrera-Cruz2.   

Abstract

The spatial extent and intensity of artificial light at night (ALAN) has increased worldwide through the growth of urban environments. There is evidence that nocturnally migrating birds are attracted to ALAN, and there is evidence that nocturnally migrating bird populations are more likely to occur in urban areas during migration, especially in the autumn. Here, we test if urban sources of ALAN are responsible, at least in part, for these observed urban associations. We use weekly estimates of diurnal occurrence and relative abundance for 40 nocturnally migrating bird species that breed in forested environments in North America to assess how associations with distance to urban areas and ALAN are defined across the annual cycle. Migratory bird populations presented stronger than expected associations with shorter distances to urban areas during migration, and stronger than expected association with higher levels of ALAN outside and especially within urban areas during migration. These patterns were more pronounced during autumn migration, especially within urban areas. Outside of the two migration periods, migratory bird populations presented stronger than expected associations with longer distances to urban areas, especially during the nonbreeding season, and weaker than expected associations with the highest levels of ALAN outside and especially within urban areas. These findings suggest that ALAN is associated with higher levels of diurnal abundance along the boundaries and within the interior of urban areas during migration, especially in the autumn when juveniles are undertaking their first migration journey. These findings support the conclusion that urban sources of ALAN can broadly effect migratory behavior, emphasizing the need to better understand the implications of ALAN for migratory bird populations.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Neotropical migrants; North America; artificial light; eBird; light pollution; nocturnal migration; seasonal bird migration; urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28695706     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  High-intensity urban light installation dramatically alters nocturnal bird migration.

Authors:  Benjamin M Van Doren; Kyle G Horton; Adriaan M Dokter; Holger Klinck; Susan B Elbin; Andrew Farnsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Artificial light at night alters behavior in laboratory and wild animals.

Authors:  Kathryn L G Russart; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-05-28

3.  Influence of artificially induced light pollution on the hormone system of two common fish species, perch and roach, in a rural habitat.

Authors:  Anika Brüning; Werner Kloas; Torsten Preuer; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Nocturnal flight-calling behaviour predicts vulnerability to artificial light in migratory birds.

Authors:  Benjamin M Winger; Brian C Weeks; Andrew Farnsworth; Andrew W Jones; Mary Hennen; David E Willard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Estimating the movements of terrestrial animal populations using broad-scale occurrence data.

Authors:  Sarah R Supp; Gil Bohrer; John Fieberg; Frank A La Sorte
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Light pollution is greatest within migration passage areas for nocturnally-migrating birds around the world.

Authors:  Sergio A Cabrera-Cruz; Jaclyn A Smolinsky; Jeffrey J Buler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Near-term ecological forecasting for dynamic aeroconservation of migratory birds.

Authors:  Kyle G Horton; Benjamin M Van Doren; Heidi J Albers; Andrew Farnsworth; Daniel Sheldon
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 7.563

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.