Danielle C Farrar1, Asim Z Mian2, Andrew E Budson3, Mark B Moss4, Bang Bon Koo4, Ronald J Killiany4. 1. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 650 Albany St, Basement, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. dfarrar@bu.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 3. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 650 Albany St, Basement, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe structural network differences in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with high versus low executive abilities, as reflected by measures of white matter connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Of the 128 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database who had both a DTI scan as well as a diagnosis of MCI, we used an executive function score to classify the top 15 scoring patients as high executive ability, and the bottom-scoring 16 patients as low executive ability. Using a regions-of-interest-based analysis, we constructed networks and calculated graph theory measures on the constructed networks. We used automated tractography in order to compare differences in major white matter tracts. RESULTS: The high executive ability group yielded greater network size, density and clustering coefficient. The high executive ability group reflected greater fractional anisotropy bilaterally in the inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi. CONCLUSIONS: The network measures of the high executive ability group demonstrated greater white matter integrity. This suggests that white matter reserve may confer greater protection of executive abilities. Loss of this reserve may lead to greater impairment in the progression to Alzheimer's disease dementia. KEY POINTS: • The MCI high executive ability group yielded a larger network. • The MCI high executive ability group had greater FA in numerous tracts. • White matter reserve may confer greater protection of executive abilities. • Loss of executive reserve may lead to greater impairment in AD dementia.
PURPOSE: To describe structural network differences in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with high versus low executive abilities, as reflected by measures of white matter connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Of the 128 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database who had both a DTI scan as well as a diagnosis of MCI, we used an executive function score to classify the top 15 scoring patients as high executive ability, and the bottom-scoring 16 patients as low executive ability. Using a regions-of-interest-based analysis, we constructed networks and calculated graph theory measures on the constructed networks. We used automated tractography in order to compare differences in major white matter tracts. RESULTS: The high executive ability group yielded greater network size, density and clustering coefficient. The high executive ability group reflected greater fractional anisotropy bilaterally in the inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi. CONCLUSIONS: The network measures of the high executive ability group demonstrated greater white matter integrity. This suggests that white matter reserve may confer greater protection of executive abilities. Loss of this reserve may lead to greater impairment in the progression to Alzheimer's disease dementia. KEY POINTS: • The MCI high executive ability group yielded a larger network. • The MCI high executive ability group had greater FA in numerous tracts. • White matter reserve may confer greater protection of executive abilities. • Loss of executive reserve may lead to greater impairment in AD dementia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognitive dysfunction; Dementia; Diffusion tensor imaging; Neuroanatomy; White matter
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Laura E Gibbons; Adam C Carle; R Scott Mackin; Danielle Harvey; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Philip Insel; S McKay Curtis; Dan Mungas; Paul K Crane Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Brianne M Bettcher; Dan Mungas; Nihar Patel; Jonathan Elofson; Shubir Dutt; Matthew Wynn; Christa L Watson; Melanie Stephens; Christine M Walsh; Joel H Kramer Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Gordon W Duncan; Michael J Firbank; Alison J Yarnall; Tien K Khoo; David J Brooks; Roger A Barker; David J Burn; John T O'Brien Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Anastasia Yendiki; Patricia Panneck; Priti Srinivasan; Allison Stevens; Lilla Zöllei; Jean Augustinack; Ruopeng Wang; David Salat; Stefan Ehrlich; Tim Behrens; Saad Jbabdi; Randy Gollub; Bruce Fischl Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Adam M Staffaroni; Breton M Asken; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Corrina Fonseca; Michelle You; Howard J Rosen; Adam L Boxer; Fanny M Elahi; John Kornak; Dan Mungas; Joel H Kramer Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 21.566