G Moretto1, A Casaril1, M Inama2,3. 1. General Surgery Unit, Hospital "Dott. Pederzoli", Via Monte Baldo 24, 37019, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. 2. General Surgery Unit, Hospital "Dott. Pederzoli", Via Monte Baldo 24, 37019, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. inama.marco@gmail.com. 3. Bioengineering and Medical-Surgical Sciences, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy. inama.marco@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the author's experience on a mini-invasive technique using bioprosthetic plug and a rectal wall flap advancement in the treatment of recurrent recto-urethral fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2015, seven patients with recurrent recto-urethral fistula were referred to the Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. Intraoperatively all patients were found to have a rectal wall lesion and were treated with urinary and fecal diversion. For the persistence of the fistula, all the patients underwent a mini-invasive treatment consisting on placement of a bioprosthetic plug in the fistula covered by an endorectal advancement flap through a trans-anal and trans-urethral combined technique. RESULTS: Median operative time was 48 min with a median blood loss of 30 ml. Median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 1-3). No case of fistula recurrence or plug migration was described. None of the patients experienced fecal or urinary incontinence. All patients obtained complete fistula healing. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent recto-urethral fistula is a challenging postsurgical complication for surgeons and urologists, and its best treatment is still unknown. Our method seems to be feasible and effective for the treatment of complex recto-urethral fistula.
PURPOSE: To report the author's experience on a mini-invasive technique using bioprosthetic plug and a rectal wall flap advancement in the treatment of recurrent recto-urethral fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2015, seven patients with recurrent recto-urethral fistula were referred to the Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. Intraoperatively all patients were found to have a rectal wall lesion and were treated with urinary and fecal diversion. For the persistence of the fistula, all the patients underwent a mini-invasive treatment consisting on placement of a bioprosthetic plug in the fistula covered by an endorectal advancement flap through a trans-anal and trans-urethral combined technique. RESULTS: Median operative time was 48 min with a median blood loss of 30 ml. Median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 1-3). No case of fistula recurrence or plug migration was described. None of the patients experienced fecal or urinary incontinence. All patients obtained complete fistula healing. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent recto-urethral fistula is a challenging postsurgical complication for surgeons and urologists, and its best treatment is still unknown. Our method seems to be feasible and effective for the treatment of complex recto-urethral fistula.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biological mesh; Complication after prostatectomy; Mini-invasive treatment; Recto-urethral fistula
Authors: Oded Zmora; Fabio M Potenti; Steven D Wexner; Alon J Pikarsky; Jonathan E Efron; Juan J Nogueras; Victor E Pricolo; Eric G Weiss Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.969