Literature DB >> 28695160

Recent advances in nonbiofouling PDMS surface modification strategies applicable to microfluidic technology.

Aslihan Gokaltun1,2,3, Martin L Yarmush1,4, Ayse Asatekin2, O Berk Usta1.   

Abstract

In the last decade microfabrication processes including rapid prototyping techniques have advanced rapidly and achieved a fairly mature stage. These advances have encouraged and enabled the use of microfluidic devices by a wider range of users with applications in biological separations and cell and organoid cultures. Accordingly, a significant current challenge in the field is controlling biomolecular interactions at interfaces and the development of novel biomaterials to satisfy the unique needs of the biomedical applications. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is one of the most widely used materials in the fabrication of microfluidic devices. The popularity of this material is the result of its low cost, simple fabrication allowing rapid prototyping, high optical transparency, and gas permeability. However, a major drawback of PDMS is its hydrophobicity and fast hydrophobic recovery after surface hydrophilization. This results in significant nonspecific adsorption of proteins as well as small hydrophobic molecules such as therapeutic drugs limiting the utility of PDMS in biomedical microfluidic circuitry. Accordingly, here, we focus on recent advances in surface molecular treatments to prevent fouling of PDMS surfaces towards improving its utility and expanding its use cases in biomedical applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microchannels; Microfluidics; Nonspecific Protein Adsorption; PDMS; Small Molecule Absorption; Surface Modification; Tissue-on-Chips

Year:  2017        PMID: 28695160      PMCID: PMC5501164          DOI: 10.1142/S2339547817300013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)


  97 in total

1.  Solvent-resistant photocurable liquid fluoropolymers for microfluidic device fabrication [corrected].

Authors:  Jason P Rolland; R Michael Van Dam; Derek A Schorzman; Stephen R Quake; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  "Click" chemistry-based surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) for protein separation in a microfluidic chip.

Authors:  Zhaowei Zhang; Xiaojun Feng; Fei Xu; Xin Liu; Bi-Feng Liu
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications.

Authors:  Stefan Haeberle; Roland Zengerle
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  The stability of radio-frequency plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces.

Authors:  I-Jane Chen; Ernö Lindner
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  Towards a human-on-chip: culturing multiple cell types on a chip with compartmentalized microenvironments.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Ziqing Zhao; Nur Aida Abdul Rahim; Danny van Noort; Hanry Yu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip for precolumn reaction and micellar electrokinetic chromatography of biogenic amines.

Authors:  Kyung Won Ro; Kwanseop Lim; Ho Kim; Jong Hoon Hahn
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Protein repellant silicone surfaces by covalent immobilization of poly(ethylene oxide).

Authors:  Hong Chen; Zheng Zhang; Yang Chen; Michael A Brook; Heather Sheardown
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems.

Authors:  Alvaro Mata; Aaron J Fleischman; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 10.  Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture.

Authors:  Keil J Regehr; Maribella Domenech; Justin T Koepsel; Kristopher C Carver; Stephanie J Ellison-Zelski; William L Murphy; Linda A Schuler; Elaine T Alarid; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Gut-on-a-chip: Current progress and future opportunities.

Authors:  Nureddin Ashammakhi; Rohollah Nasiri; Natan Roberto de Barros; Peyton Tebon; Jai Thakor; Marcus Goudie; Amir Shamloo; Martin G Martin; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  3D-bioprinted cancer-on-a-chip: level-up organotypic in vitro models.

Authors:  Maria V Monteiro; Yu Shrike Zhang; Vítor M Gaspar; João F Mano
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 3.  Organ-On-A-Chip Models of the Blood-Brain Barrier: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakita; Kalpana Mandal; Lei Mou; Marvin Magan Mecwan; Yangzhi Zhu; Shaopei Li; Saurabh Sharma; Ana Lopez Hernandez; Huu Tuan Nguyen; Surjendu Maity; Natan Roberto de Barros; Aya Nakayama; Praveen Bandaru; Samad Ahadian; Han-Jun Kim; Rondinelli Donizetti Herculano; Eggehard Holler; Vadim Jucaud; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 4.  Microfluidics in vascular biology research: a critical review for engineers, biologists, and clinicians.

Authors:  Grigor Simitian; María Virumbrales-Muñoz; Cristina Sánchez-de-Diego; David J Beebe; David Kosoff
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 7.517

5.  3D self-organized microvascular model of the human blood-brain barrier with endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes.

Authors:  Marco Campisi; Yoojin Shin; Tatsuya Osaki; Cynthia Hajal; Valeria Chiono; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

Review 7.  Design of an automated capillary electrophoresis platform for single-cell analysis.

Authors:  David H Abraham; Matthew M Anttila; Luke A Gallion; Brae V Petersen; Angela Proctor; Nancy L Allbritton
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Substrate Resistance to Traction Forces Controls Fibroblast Polarization.

Authors:  Dimitris Missirlis; Tamás Haraszti; Lara Heckmann; Joachim P Spatz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  Advancements in Microfluidic Systems for the Study of Female Reproductive Biology.

Authors:  Vedant V Bodke; Joanna E Burdette
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 10.  Biomimetic models of the glomerulus.

Authors:  Marta G Valverde; Luis S Mille; Kianti P Figler; Ernesto Cervantes; Vanessa Y Li; Joseph V Bonventre; Rosalinde Masereeuw; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 28.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.