Literature DB >> 28694002

Failure to rescue in living donor liver transplantation: Patterns and predictors.

Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti1, Faisal Saud Dar2, Ammal Imran Qureshi2, Nusrat Yar Khan2, Haseeb Haider Zia2, Eitzaz Ud Din Khan3, Nasir Ayub Khan3, Mohammad Salih4, Najmul Hassan Shah4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a quality assessment tool, failure to rescue (FTR) has been employed in various surgical specialties. However, its role in liver transplantation has only recently been explored. To the best of our knowledge, role of FTR in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has not been assessed previously. The objective of the current study was to determine failure to rescue (FTR) rate and it's predictors in an LDLT center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent LDLT at our center between 2012 and 2016. Patients who experienced grade 3B or above complications on Clavien-Dindo grading were included in this study. Primary outcome of interest was FTR rate in these patients. FTR was defined as a preventable major complication followed by death within one year after transplantation. We also looked at independent predictors of FTR in our patients and a multivariate analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Median age was 48.4(18-73) years. Male to female ratio was 3.3:1. Median MELD score was 17(6-42). The FTR rate in the current study was 52/131 (39.6%). Infectious complications were more common in the FTR group i.e. 22/32(68.8%) versus 10/32 (31.2%) (P < 0.0001). Biliary complications were more common in the non-FTR group i.e. 49/62 (79.1%) versus 13/62 (20.9%) (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, there was a 60% increase in mortality following a major complication in the presence of early allograft dysfunction (Hazard ratio: 1.6, Confidence interval; 1.2-2.2, P = 0.002). A 40% reduction in FTR was seen in patients with a biliary complication versus other complications (Hazard ratio: 0.6, Confidence interval = 0.4-0.8, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: Early allograft dysfunction and biliary complications are independent predictors of FTR in LDLT.
Copyright © 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile leak; Liver transplant; Living donor; Morbidity; Mortality; Sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28694002     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  4 in total

Review 1.  Failure to rescue in surgical patients: A review for acute care surgeons.

Authors:  Justin S Hatchimonji; Elinore J Kaufman; Catherine E Sharoky; Lucy Ma; Anna E Garcia Whitlock; Daniel N Holena
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Biliary complications in recipients of living donor liver transplantation: A single-centre study.

Authors:  Reginia Nabil Guirguis; Ehab Hasan Nashaat; Azza Emam Yassin; Wesam Ahmed Ibrahim; Shereen A Saleh; Mohamed Bahaa; Mahmoud El-Meteini; Mohamed Fathy; Hany Mansour Dabbous; Iman Fawzy Montasser; Manar Salah; Ghada Abdelrahman Mohamed
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Best achievable results need territorial familiarity: Impact of living donor liver transplant experience on outcomes after pancreaticodoudenectomy.

Authors:  Abu Bakar H Bhatti; Roshni Z Jafri; Nasir A Khan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-30

4.  The postoperative hepatic artery resistance index after living donor liver transplantation can predict early allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  Tao Lv; LingXiang Kong; Jiayin Yang; Hong Wu; Tianfu Wen; Li Jiang; Jian Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.