Michael Saheb Kashaf1, Elizabeth Tyner McGill2, Zackary Dov Berger3. 1. School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: mskashaf@jhmi.edu. 2. Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease which necessitates the development of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider. This review systematically examines the association between treatment shared decision-making (SDM) and outcomes in diabetes. METHODS: A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. Included studies were subjected to dual data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes were synthesized using meta-analyses where reporting was sufficiently homogenous or alternatively synthesized in narrative fashion. RESULTS: The search retrieved 4592 records, which were screened by title, abstract, and full text to identify 16 studies with a range of study designs and populations. We found evidence of an association between SDM and improved decision quality, patient knowledge and patient risk perception. We found little evidence of an association between SDM and glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life, medication adherence or trust in physician. CONCLUSIONS: This work elucidates the potential clinical utility of SDM interventions in the management of Type 2 Diabetes and helps inform future research on the topic. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A more complete understanding of the associations between SDM and outcomes will guide and motivate efforts aimed at improving uptake of the SDM paradigm.
OBJECTIVE:Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease which necessitates the development of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider. This review systematically examines the association between treatment shared decision-making (SDM) and outcomes in diabetes. METHODS: A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. Included studies were subjected to dual data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes were synthesized using meta-analyses where reporting was sufficiently homogenous or alternatively synthesized in narrative fashion. RESULTS: The search retrieved 4592 records, which were screened by title, abstract, and full text to identify 16 studies with a range of study designs and populations. We found evidence of an association between SDM and improved decision quality, patient knowledge and patient risk perception. We found little evidence of an association between SDM and glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life, medication adherence or trust in physician. CONCLUSIONS: This work elucidates the potential clinical utility of SDM interventions in the management of Type 2 Diabetes and helps inform future research on the topic. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A more complete understanding of the associations between SDM and outcomes will guide and motivate efforts aimed at improving uptake of the SDM paradigm.
Authors: Aliza Ben-Zacharia; Meagan Adamson; Allison Boyd; Paula Hardeman; Jennifer Smrtka; Bryan Walker; Tracy Walker Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2018 Nov-Dec
Authors: Julie C Lauffenburger; Roya Ghazinouri; Saira Jan; Sagar Makanji; Christina A Ferro; Jennifer Lewey; Eric Wittbrodt; Jessica Lee; Nancy Haff; Constance P Fontanet; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fernando Álvarez-Guisasola; Domingo Orozco-Beltrán; Ana M Cebrián-Cuenca; Manuel Antonio Ruiz Quintero; Escarlata Angullo Martínez; Luis Ávila Lachica; Carlos Ortega Millán; Elena Caride Miana; Jorge Navarro-Pérez; Julio Sagredo Perez; Joan Barrot de la Puente; Francesc Xavier Cos Claramunt Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Clarissa J Diamantidis; Hayden B Bosworth; Megan M Oakes; Clemontina A Davenport; Jane F Pendergast; Sejal Patel; Jivan Moaddeb; Huiman X Barnhart; Peter D Merrill; Khaula Baloch; Matthew J Crowley; Uptal D Patel Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: María Victoria Ruiz Yanzi; Mariela Silvia Barani; Juan Victor Ariel Franco; Fernando Ramón Vazquez Peña; Sergio Adrian Terrasa; Karin Silvana Kopitowski Journal: Health Expect Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 3.377