Literature DB >> 28693819

Haemodynamics and stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: A fluid-structure interaction study into the effect of proximal neck and iliac bifurcation angle.

Corey J Drewe1, Louis P Parker1, Lachlan J Kelsey1, Paul E Norman2, Janet T Powell3, Barry J Doyle4.   

Abstract

Our knowledge of how geometry influences abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) biomechanics is still developing. Both iliac bifurcation angle and proximal neck angle could impact the haemodynamics and stresses within AAA. Recent comparisons of the morphology of ruptured and intact AAA show that cases with large iliac bifurcation angles are less likely to rupture than those with smaller angles. We aimed to perform fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations on a range of idealised AAA geometries to conclusively determine the influence of proximal neck and iliac bifurcation angle on AAA wall stress and haemodynamics. Peak wall shear stress (WSS) and time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) in the AAA sac region only increased when the proximal neck angle exceeded 30°. Both peak WSS (p<0.0001) and peak von Mises wall stress (p=0.027) increased with iliac bifurcation angle, whereas endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) decreased with iliac bifurcation angle (p<0.001) and increased with increasing neck angle. These observations may be important as AAAs have been shown to expand, develop thrombus and rupture in areas of low WSS. Here we show that AAAs with larger iliac bifurcation angles have higher WSS, potentially reducing the likelihood of rupture. Furthermore, ECAP was lower in AAA geometries with larger iliac bifurcation angles, implying less likelihood of thrombus development and wall degeneration. Therefore our findings could help explain the clinical observation of lower rupture rates associated with AAAs with large iliac bifurcation angles.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Fluid structure interaction; Geometry; Wall shear stress; Wall stress

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28693819     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Immune Modulation as a Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  S Keisin Wang; Michael P Murphy
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Ultrasound-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Incorporating Pre-stress.

Authors:  Judith H C Fonken; Esther J Maas; Arjet H M Nievergeld; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Frans N van de Vosse; Richard G P Lopata
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Description of human AAA by cytokine and immune cell aberrations compared to risk-factor matched controls.

Authors:  S Keisin Wang; Linden A Green; Ashley R Gutwein; Natalie A Drucker; Raghu L Motaganahalli; Alok K Gupta; Andres Fajardo; Michael P Murphy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Gender differences of morphological and hemodynamic characteristics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Zujie Gao; Jiang Xiong; Zengsheng Chen; Xiaoyan Deng; Zaipin Xu; Anqiang Sun; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.027

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.