| Literature DB >> 28693465 |
Mehul Kumar Chourasia1, Kamaraju Raghavendra2, Rajendra Mohan Bhatt3, Dipak Kumar Swain1, G D P Dutta3, Immo Kleinschmidt4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA), female health volunteers working at village level have become an integral component of National Health Mission (NHM) in India in the past two decades. Mitanin (meaning female friend in local dialect), a precursor of ASHA, play an indispensable role in early detection of health related problems and are helping in improving overall community health status in Chhattisgarh state. The current study was carried out to evaluate the feasibility of involving Mitanin in active malaria surveillance work in 80 tribal villages of Chhattisgarh and to explore the challenges and determinants to perform malaria surveillance activities by the Mitanins.Entities:
Keywords: Active malaria surveillance; Asha; Chhattisgarh; India; Mitanin
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28693465 PMCID: PMC5504842 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4565-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Grading factors and scores for Mitanins evaluation
| Sl. no | Grading factor | Maximum score | Marking criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basic educational qualification | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 2 | Level of knowledge about malaria | ||
| 2.a | Sign & symptoms of malaria | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 2.b | Knowledge about malaria control | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 3 | Slide preparation | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 4 | RDT preparation | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 5 | Knowledge about anti-malarial drugs | ||
| 5.a | Treatment of | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 5.b | Treatment of | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 6 | Form filling and documentation | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| 7 | Temperature reading | 01 | Yes – 1, No- 0 |
| Total score | 09 | ||
| Grade- A 9–8; B 7–6; C 5–4; D 3–2; E 1–0 | |||
Baseline socio-demographic characteristics of Mitanins (N = 162)[IIR(n = 81): non IIR(n = 81)
| Variable | Category | IIR | Non- IIR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age | ≥ 35 years | 31 (38.3) | 31 (38.3) | 62 (38.3) |
| Marital status | Married | 74 (91.4) | 72 (88.9) | 146 (90.1) |
| Family type | Nuclear | 38 (46.9) | 47 (58) | 85 (52.5) |
| Extended nuclear | 13 (16) | 10 (12.3) | 23 (14.2) | |
| Joint | 30 (37) | 24 (29.6) | 54 (33.3) | |
| Education | ≥ Primary education | 65 (80.2) | 48 (59.2) | 113 (69.7) |
| Literacy | Read and write | 59 (72.8) | 41 (50.6) | 100 (61.7) |
| Household visit /week | Mean (±SD) | 52 (±42) | 42 (±68) | 47 (±57) |
| Serving population | Mean (±SD) | 255 (±134) | 206 (±147) | 231 (±142) |
| Focus group discussion held prior to join Mitanin program | Yes | 54 (66.7) | 60 (74.1) | 114 (70.4) |
| Village meeting held prior to join Mitanin program | Yes | 38 (33.3) | 43 (53.1) | 81 (50) |
| Prior work experience | Yes | 14 (17.3) | 09 (11.1) | 23 (14.2) |
| Primary reason of join Mitanin program | Financial incentives | 04 (4.9) | 04 (4.9) | 08 (4.9) |
| Opportunity to learn | 07 (8.6) | 06 (7.4) | 13 (8) | |
| Support village health facilities | 23 (28.4) | 13 (16) | 36 (22.2) | |
| Social prestige | 01 (1.2) | 01 (1.2) | 02 (1.2) | |
| Pressure from family and relatives | 37 (45.7) | 47 (58) | 84 (51.9) | |
| Other | 9 (11.1) | 10 (12.3) | 19 (11.7) |
Performance of Mitanins in individual factors between the groups
| Sl no. | Evaluation factor | IIR ( | Non- IIR ( | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basic educational qualification | 65 (80.2) | 48 (59.3) |
|
|
| 2 | Level of knowledge about malaria | ||||
| 2.a | Sign & symptoms of Malaria | 78 (96.3) | 68 (84) |
|
|
| 2.b | Knowledge about Malaria control | 80 (98.8) | 71 (87.7) |
| |
| 3. | Slide preparation | 80 (98.8) | 77 (95.1) | 0.165 | 0.066 |
| 4. | RDT preparation | 74(91.4) | 62 (76.5) |
|
|
| 5. | Knowledge about anti-malarial drugs( | 69 (85.2) | 51 (63) |
|
|
| 6. | Forms filling & documentation | 35 (43.2) | 26 (32.1) | 0.122 | - |
| 7. | Temperature measurement | 68 (83.9) | 27 (33.3) |
|
|
*Univariate conditional logistic regression
#Backward conditional logistic regression (step 5), P value less than 0.05 are statistically significant
Mitanins performance after adjusting with socio-demographic determinants (n = 162)
| Variable | Category | IIR | Non-IIR | Unadjusted Odds ratio (95% CI), | Adjusted Odds ratio, (95% CI), |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall performance | ≥ B | 68 (80) | 30 (43.5) | 6 (2.53–14.24) | 4.64 (1.85–11.62) |
| Marital status | Married | 74(91.4) | 72 (88.9) | 1.4 (0.44–4.41) |
|
| Family type | Nuclear | 38 (46.9) | 47 (58) | 0.61 (0.31–1.18) | 0.76 (0.35–1.67) |
| Literate | Yes | 59 (72.8) | 41 (50.6) | 3.57 (1.55–8.26) | 2.28 (0.87–5.96) |
| Prior work experience | Yes | 14 (17.3) | 09 (11.1) | 1.71 (0.68–4.35) | 1.16 (0.38–3.5) |
| Purpose of joining Mitanin program | Financial incentives/Learning opportunity/Support health facilities | 34 (41.9) | 23 (28.3) | 1.79 (0.93–3.44) | 1.75 (0.794–3.84) |
*Univariate conditional logistic regression
#Multivariate conditional logistic regression, P value less than 0.05 are statistically significant
Summary of major challenges cited by Mitanins during in-depth interview
| Sl. no. | List of major challenges | Mitanin | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIR | Non-IIR | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1. | Lack of support from superior staff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 2. | Delayed payments by the govt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. | Lack of appreciation and priority treatment of cases referred by them to ANM/Hospital |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| 4. | Less incentive based on performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. | Intermittent medicine supply from the hospital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||