| Literature DB >> 28693461 |
Wenqing Wang1, Kathryn E Muessig2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Significant domestic and global research has focused on HIV risk among China's large internal migrant population. Much of this work takes an individual behavior approach while ignoring the critical role social networks play in shaping HIV risk.Entities:
Keywords: China; Commercial sex; Condom use; Male migrant; Social network
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28693461 PMCID: PMC5527374 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4409-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Sampling stages and data management
Sociodemographic and network characteristics of participants (N = 385)
| Characteristic | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Agea | 31.56 (9.09) |
| Education | |
| ≤ High school | 210 (54.55) |
| > High school | 175 (45.45) |
| Monthly income | |
| < 5000 yuan | 207 (53.77) |
| ≥ 5000 yuan | 178 (46.23) |
| Employment | |
| Employed | 227 (59.96) |
| Self-employed or other | 158 (41.04) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 228 (59.22) |
| Unmarried | 157 (40.78) |
| Steady sex partner | |
| Yes | 299 (77.66) |
| No | 86 (22.34) |
| Networking frequency | |
| ≥ Twice per month | 216 (56.10) |
| < Twice per month | 169 (43.90) |
| Consistent condom use in commercial sex (subsample, | 99 (71.22) |
| Size of full | |
| > 5 | 207 (53.77) |
| ≤ 5 | 178 (46.23) |
| Density of core | 0.59 (0.34) |
| Participant-reported number of alters in core | |
| 0 | 230 (59.74) |
| ≥ 1 | 155 (40.26) |
| Participant-reported number of alters in core | |
| 0 | 38 (27.34) |
| ≥ 1 | 101 (72.66) |
| Participant-reported number of alters in core | |
| 0 | 74 (53.24) |
| ≥ 1 | 65 (46.76) |
| Weighted commercial sex norm of core | −0.02 (38.66) |
| Weighted condom use norm of core | 8.28 (33.94) |
aMean (SD)
Logistic analysis of commercial sex in the last year (N = 385)
| Characteristic (reference) | Commercial sex in the last year odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Age | 0.97 (0.93–1.00)† | 0.96 (0.92–1.01)† | 0.95 (0.91–1.00)* |
| ≤ High school (> high school) | 3.17 (1.63–6.18)** | 3.95 (1.83–8.56)*** | 4.19 (1.84–9.53)** |
| ≥ 5000 yuan (< 5000 yuan) | 1.50 (0.76–2.95) | 1.78 (0.80–3.97) | 1.65 (0.72–3.82) |
| Self-employed or else (employed) | 0.83 (0.45–1.51) | 1.19 (0.59–2.39) | 1.25 (0.60–2.60) |
| Unmarried or else (married) | 0.74 (0.32–1.67) | 0.76 (0.29–1.99) | 0.86 (0.31–2.50) |
| No steady sex partner (yes) | 3.54 (1.46–8.56)** | 5.45 (1.91–15.59)** | 5.08 (1.71–15.06)** |
| ≥ | 1.45 (0.79–2.65) | 1.54 (0.75–3.17) | 1.76 (0.78–3.58) |
| Perceived vulnerability to HIV/STIs | 0.95 (0.85–1.07) | 0.90 (0.78–1.03) | 0.90 (0.77–1.04) |
| Perceived severity of being infected with HIV/STIs | 0.83 (0.64–1.07) | 1.00 (0.75–1.34) | 1.04 (0.78–1.39) |
| Perceived necessity & effectiveness of condom use in commercial sex | 1.13 (0.93–1.36) | 1.05 (0.86–1.28) | 1.08 (0.87–1.34) |
| Perceived social motivations of commercial sex | 1.60 (1.45–1.78)*** | 1.54 (1.36–1.76)*** | 1.62 (1.40–1.87)*** |
| Size of | 0.55 (0.27–1.12)† | 0.50 (0.24–1.08)† | |
| Density of core | 1.46 (0.52–4.11) | 1.19 (0.40–3.54) | |
| Alters having commercial sex ≥1 (0) | 5.67 (2.75–11.67)*** | ||
| Weighted commercial sex norm of core | 1.03 (1.02–1.04)*** | ||
| Model G2 (−2 Loglikelihood) | 308.96 | 232.97 | 208.40 |
| Degrees of freedom | 11 | 14 | 14 |
| Changed Chi square | 75.99*** | 100.56*** | |
†p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < 001
Logistic analysis of condom use in commercial sex in the last year (N = 139)
| Characteristic (reference) | Consistent condom use in commercial sex odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Age | 0.99 (0.92–1.07) | 1.01 (0.91–1.11) | 1.04 (0.93–1.16) |
| ≤ High school (> high school) | 0.81 (0.24–2.76) | 0.73 (0.16–3.31) | 0.54 (0.12–2.51) |
| ≥ 5000 yuan (< 5000 yuan) | 2.22 (0.68–7.20) | 1.18 (0.27–5.15) | 1.00 (0.20–4.90) |
| Self-employed or else (employed) | 1.79 (0.53–6.07) | 2.98 (0.69–12.91) | 2.09 (0.47–9.19) |
| Unmarried or else (married) | 0.81 (0.20–3.32) | 2.06 (0.30–14.37) | 1.67 (0.23–11.24) |
| No steady sex partner (yes) | 0.83 (0.19–3.56) | 0.55 (0.09–3.49) | 0.67 (0.12–3.93) |
| ≥ | 3.70 (1.33–10.28)* | 3.58 (0.88–14.49)† | 4.74 (1.14–19.75)* |
| Perceived vulnerability to HIV/STIs | 0.71 (0.59–0.86)*** | 0.59 (0.44–0.79)*** | 0.60 (0.45–0.80)*** |
| Perceived severity of being infected with HIV/STIs | 1.76 (1.08–2.87)* | 2.33 (1.21–4.49)* | 2.09 (1.15–3.81)* |
| Perceived necessity & effectiveness of condom use in commercial sex | 1.43 (1.00–2.06)† | 0.95 (0.59–1.55) | 1.11 (0.68–1.79) |
| Size of | 1.91 (0.45–8.10) | 2.84 (0.58–14.06) | |
| Density of core | 1.34 (0.18–10.04) | 1.55 (0.17–14.25) | |
| Alters always using condoms in commercial sex ≥1 (0) | 11.95 (2.42–59.01)** | ||
| Weighted condom use norm of core | 1.04 (1.02–1.07)** | ||
| Model G2 (−2 Loglikelihood) | 114.29 | 76.96 | 72.21 |
| Degrees of freedom | 10 | 13 | 13 |
| Changed Chi square | 37.33*** | 42.08*** | |
†p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001