Uwe Drescher1, Jessica Koschate1, Uwe Hoffmann1, Stefan Schneider2,3, Andreas Werner4. 1. a Institute of Physiology and Anatomy , German Sport University Cologne , Cologne , Germany. 2. b Institute of Movement and Neurosciences , German Sport University Cologne , Cologne , Germany. 3. c Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering , University of the Sunshine Coast , Maroochydore , Australia. 4. d Center for Space Medicine and Extreme Environments , Institute for Physiology, Charité University Medicine , Berlin , Germany.
Abstract
AIM: The goal of the study was to compare the kinetic responses of heart rate (HR) and pulmonary (V̇O2pulm) and muscular (V̇O2musc) oxygen uptake during dynamic leg exercise across different acute ambient temperature conditions in a climatic chamber. METHODS: Thirteen physically healthy, active, male volunteers demonstrated pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) work rate (WR) changes between 30 and 80 W at 15 °C, 25 °C and 35 °C, respectively. HR was measured beat-to-beat using an echocardiogram and V̇O2pulm by breath-by-breath gas exchange; V̇O2musc estimations were assessed by applying a circulatory model and cross-correlation functions. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed across the various temperature conditions in each case for HR, V̇O2pulm or V̇O2musc kinetics (p > 0.05). Baroreflex regulation based on HR kinetics does not seem to be influenced between ambient temperatures of 15 °C and 35 °C during dynamic exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that ambient temperatures of 15 °C, 25 °C and 35 °C have no effect on HR, V̇O2pulm or V̇O2musc kinetics during dynamic moderate exercise. The applied approach may be of interest for assessments of the cardio-pulmonary and respiratory health statuses of individuals working or performing sports in extreme temperature environments. Furthermore, differentiation between systemic (e.g. cardio-dynamic: HR) and specific (e.g. exercising tissues: V̇O2musc) determinants of the relevant physiological systems may improve the evaluation of an individual's health status.
AIM: The goal of the study was to compare the kinetic responses of heart rate (HR) and pulmonary (V̇O2pulm) and muscular (V̇O2musc) oxygen uptake during dynamic leg exercise across different acute ambient temperature conditions in a climatic chamber. METHODS: Thirteen physically healthy, active, male volunteers demonstrated pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) work rate (WR) changes between 30 and 80 W at 15 °C, 25 °C and 35 °C, respectively. HR was measured beat-to-beat using an echocardiogram and V̇O2pulm by breath-by-breath gas exchange; V̇O2musc estimations were assessed by applying a circulatory model and cross-correlation functions. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed across the various temperature conditions in each case for HR, V̇O2pulm or V̇O2musc kinetics (p > 0.05). Baroreflex regulation based on HR kinetics does not seem to be influenced between ambient temperatures of 15 °C and 35 °C during dynamic exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that ambient temperatures of 15 °C, 25 °C and 35 °C have no effect on HR, V̇O2pulm or V̇O2musc kinetics during dynamic moderate exercise. The applied approach may be of interest for assessments of the cardio-pulmonary and respiratory health statuses of individuals working or performing sports in extreme temperature environments. Furthermore, differentiation between systemic (e.g. cardio-dynamic: HR) and specific (e.g. exercising tissues: V̇O2musc) determinants of the relevant physiological systems may improve the evaluation of an individual's health status.