Literature DB >> 28693305

Comparison of the characteristics of canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells extracted from different sites and at different passage numbers.

Kevin M Yaneselli1, Cristiana P Kuhl2, Paula B Terraciano2, Fernanda S de Oliveira2, Sabrina B Pizzato2, Kamila Pazza2, Alessandra B Magrisso2, Vanessa Torman3, Analía Rial4, María Moreno4, Silvia Llambí5, Elizabeth Cirne-Lima2, Jacqueline Maisonnave1.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have desirable characteristics for use in therapy in animal models and veterinary medicine, due to their capacity of inducing tissue regeneration and immunomodulation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between canine adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) extracted from subcutaneous (Sc) and visceral (Vs) sites. Surface antigenic markers, in vitro differentiation, and mineralized matrix quantification of AD-MSCs at different passages (P4, P6, and P8) were studied. Immunophenotypic analysis showed that AD-MSCs from both sites were CD44+, CD90+, and CD45-. Moreover, they were able, in vitro, to differentiate into fat, cartilage, and bone. Sc-AD-MSCs preserve in vitro multipotentiality up to P8, but Vs-AD-MSCs only tri-differentiated up to P4. In addition, compared to Vs-AD-MSCs, Sc-AD-MSCs had greater capacity for in vitro mineralized matrix synthesis. In conclusion, Sc-AD-MSCs have advantages over Vs-AD-MSCs, as Sc AD-MSCs preserve multipotentiality during a greater number of passages, have more osteogenic potential, and require less invasive extraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  canine; immunophenotyping; mesenchymal stem cells; multipotent plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28693305      PMCID: PMC5799390          DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2018.19.1.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Sci        ISSN: 1229-845X            Impact factor:   1.672


Introduction

Adult-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a non-specialized lineage, with limited ability for auto-renovation and plasticity. Their multipotentiality allows them to differentiate into lineages derived from the same germinal line, mesoderm [530], and also to differentiate into other non-mesodermal lineages [126]. Since a report by Caplan [6], which proposed the use of MSCs in orthopedics, the interest in MSCs has increased due to their potential for use in regenerative medicine. The increased interest is due to the attractive characteristics of MSCs: multipotentiality [11], immunomodulation [219], angiogenesis [1433], homing to the site of inflammation [732], and antimicrobial effect [1320]. All of the aforementioned characteristics indicate the great therapeutic potential of MSCs in human and veterinary medicine. Furthermore, domestic animals have similar pathologies to humans, so they can be used as animal models [31]. In order to be able to compare results between researchers, MSCs used in therapy, must be characterized, following the recommendations of the International Society of Cellular Therapy (ISCT). The MSCs must have a fibroblastic morphology, be adherent to plastic, express mesenchymal stromal markers, and have in vitro tri-differentiation capacity [5]. Different surface markers, such as CD29, CD44, and CD90 have been used to characterize canine adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) [112430]. Other markers, such as hematopoietic markers CD34 and CD45 need to be absent or have very low expression [1124]. There is limited availability of flow cytometry reagents specific for canines, thus, in most of the cases, human- or mouse-specific antibodies that have cross-reactivity with canines are used. However, one problem is that cross-reactivity results in different proportions of positive cells for a variety of markers; thus, there is controversy over which surface markers are most appropriate for canine MSCs [2224]. Initially, the most common MSC source was bone marrow (BM) [25], but currently, the adipose tissue (AT) source, described for the first time by Zuk et al. [35], is more commonly studied. AD-MSCs have several advantages over BM-derived MSCs, as the use of AT results in more MSCs being obtained and the AT-derived cells have greater proliferative ability [322]. Moreover, the AT extraction method is less invasive [11] and AD-MSCs conserve their undifferentiated state during more passages [15]. These characteristics have motivated researchers to focus on AT as a safe and convenient source of MSCs for use in regenerative medicine [911]. Several studies in humans and animal models have compared the characteristics of AD-MSCs derived from different anatomical sites, such as those in subcutaneous (Sc) and visceral (Vs) areas. Multipotentiality studies on AD-MSCs of both origins have shown contrasting results regarding differentiation capacity and in vitro propagation ability [42122]. There are few in vitro studies comparing immunophenotype and multipotentiality characteristics of canine MSCs derived from different AT sites at different passage numbers. Our hypothesis is that different AT origins and passage numbers have an effect on MSC properties. The objective of the present study was to evaluate, in vitro, differences in immunophenotype and multipotentiality over serial passages of canine AD-MSCs derived from Sc and Vs sites.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The AT samples were extracted from 5 healthy female canines, 5 to 11 months old, in interestrus. Abdominal AT, was extracted from two different sites, flank Sc and periovaric Vs, of canines submitted to ovariectomy. This study was carried out, in strict accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on Ethics of Animal Experiments of Brazil “Comitê de ética no uso de animais do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (CEUA/HCPA)” under approval number 130510.

AT collection

Canines were anesthetized with intravenous propofol (Eurofarma Laboratórios, Brazil; 6 mg/kg) and intramuscular tramadol (Laboratório Teuto Brasileiro, Brazil; 4 mg/mL) and anesthesia was maintained through intubation with 2% isoflurane (Instituto Bioquímico Indústria Farmacêutica, Brazil). The surgery area was trichotomized and embrocated with idiophone solution and isolated with surgical fields. A midline incision was performed on the skin and Sc-AT was extracted from the edges of the surgical wound. After removal of the ovaries, the Vs-AT was extracted from the periovarian region.

AD-MSC isolation and expansion

Approximately 2 to 4 g of AT were cut into small pieces and washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) twice. Then, the pieces were submitted to enzymatic digestion for 40 min at 37℃, in a solution of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) low glucose (Gibco, USA) and 0.1 mg/mL of type I collagenase (Gibco, USA). The digested material was centrifuged at 700 × g for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in growing media consisting of DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Brazil), and 1% antibiotic (penicillin 1 Unit/mL, streptomycin 1 µg/mL, and L-glutamine 2.92 µg/mL; Gibco, USA) and then seeded in tissue culture flasks (Greiner, Germany). The cultures were incubated at 37℃ with 5% CO2, and every 48 h, the medium was changed. When 80% to 90% confluence was attained, the cultures were treated with trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) 0.005% (Gibco, USA) and subcultured.

Immunophenotyping of AD-MSCs

The Sc- and Vs-AD-MSC phenotypes were evaluated, at passages P4, P6 and P8, by performing flow cytometry as previously described by Yaneselli et al. [34]. Briefly, cells were washed with PBS (Ca++ and Mg++ free) containing 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.5% FBS (FACS-EDTA). Then, cells were immunostained for 30 min at 4℃ in the dark with 10 µL of each of allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD44 (clone IM7; Leinco Technologies, USA) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-CD45/LCA (CD45RO, clone UCHL1; Acris Antibodies, USA) antibodies, as well as 20 µL of phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD90 antibody (THY1, clone 5E10; antibodies-online, USA). After incubation, cells were washed with FACS buffer. Acquisition was performed by using a FACS Canto II system (BD Biosciences, USA) with 5,000 events per sample. The obtained data were analyzed by using FlowJo software (Tree Star, USA) and categorized according to the method of Takemitsu et al. [27].

Cell differentiation assay

The AD-MSCs at P4, P6, and P8 were seeded in duplicate at 9.4 × 103 cells/well in CELLSTAR 24-well plates (Greiner), and 24 to 48 h later, they were in vitro differentiated with growing media, DMEM low glucose supplemented with 10% FSB and without antibiotic, according to the method of Vieira et al. [30]. Cells were maintained for 21 days with a media change every 3 to 4 days. Briefly, for adipogenic differentiation: 5 µM isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 60 µM indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5 µg/mL insulin (Eli Lilly and Company, USA) were added to the growing media. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min and Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to stain the lipid drops. For chondrogenic differentiation: 50 µM ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 ng/mL transforming growth factor-β (Sigma-Aldrich), and 6.25 µg/mL insulin were added to the growing media. Then, cells were fixed and stained with Alcian Blue (Sigma-Aldrich) to detect the presence of cartilage matrix. For osteogenic differentiation: 1 µM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 50 µM ascorbic acid were added to the growing media. Then, they were fixed and stained with Alizarin Red (Sigma-Aldrich) to detect mineralized matrix.

Mineralized matrix quantification

Nine random microscopic images (640 × 480 pixels, Nikon TE2000-U; Nikon, Japan) were taken at passages P4, P6, and P8 of Alizarin Red-stained Sc- and Vs-origin tissue cultures that had been induced to bone differentiation. Images were analyzed with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA), which designated pixel status according to the intensity of the red color of the mineralized matrix.

Statistical analysis

The generalized estimating equation within the IBM SPSS Statistics software (ver. 23.0; IBM, USA) was used to evaluate the potentials of adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation and the mineralized matrix synthesis capacity. Results are expressed as mean ± SD values. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05, and values between p > 0.05 and p < 0.10 were considered as indicative of a tendency.

Results

Characteristic of AD-MSCs

Cells from both sites had fibroblastic-like morphology, adhered to plastic, and formed homogenous monolayers. AD-MSCs attained 80% confluence at 5 to 7 days. Immunophenotyping of AD-MSCs was assessed at P4, P6, and P8, with similar antigenic surface expression observed among the average passages from the same origin. Both Sc- and Vs-AD-MSCs were positive for CD44 (98.9% ± 0.6% and 97.4% ± 2.3%, respectively). Regarding CD90 expression, 72.3% ± 17.3% of Sc and 71.4% ± 15.8% of Vs cells were positive for this marker. Only 6.0% ± 4.5% of Sc and 4.8% ± 2.7% of Vs cells were positive for CD45, indicating that most cells of both lineages were negative for this hematopoietic marker. In summary, most of the AD-MSCs obtained, regardless of their origin, were positive for CD44 and CD90, with few cells expressing CD45 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Expressions of CD44, CD90, and CD45 on adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells of subcutaneous (Sc) or visceral (Vs) origin were assessed by performing flow cytometry (n = 2). Data are representative of analyzed passages.

Adipocyte and chondrocyte differentiation potential

AD-MSCs of both origins were able to differentiate in vitro into adipose and cartilage lineages (panels A and B in Fig. 2 and panels G and H in Fig. 2). On adipose induction, morphological changes were observed in the first week. At week 3, differentiation was confirmed by the presence of red staining (Oil Red O-positive) of the intracellular lipid drops. At 21 days, the blue color (Alcian Blue-positive) of the chondrogenic-induced cells is due to the presence of glycosaminoglycans. Negative control cells showed no morphological changes and no affinity for dyes, in accordance with their undifferentiated state. Adipogenic and chondrogenic potentials of both lineages (Sc and Vs) diminished with the increase in passages (panels A and B in Fig. 3). Also, Sc cells on passages P4, P6, and P8 showed higher potential for in vitro differentiation than Vs cells; however, these differences were only tendencies (adipose p = 0.091, cartilage p = 0.095). Furthermore, Sc cells showed multipotentiality up to P8, but with a gradual loss of this characteristic and a marked decrease at P6. The majority of the Sc cells grew very little or stopped growing at P8 (category “non-growth”). On the other hand, the Vs-origin cells had plasticity differentiation only up to P4.
Fig. 2

Tri-differentiation microscopic images of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) at P2 in vitro (n = 5). Adipogenic differentiation images at 400× (intracellular lipid vacuoles) for subcutaneous (Sc) and visceral (Vs) (A and G). Chondrogenic differentiation images at 40× (B and H). Osteogenic differentiation images at 40× (C and I). Negative controls are shown in images D–F and J–L.

Fig. 3

Evaluation of in vitro differentiation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells from both extraction sites at different passages (n = 5). (A) Adipogenic differentiation. (B) Chondrogenic differentiation. (C) Osteogenic differentiation. The “non-growth” category exhibits an initial gradual increase, becoming abrupt between P6 to P8. The multipotentiality had a negative effect on adipose (p < 0.001) and cartilage (p < 0.01) lineages, but the bone lineage showed a marked tendency with the increase of passages (p = 0.054).

Osteogenic differentiation potential

The osteogenic-induced cells, at one week after induction, exhibited morphological changes, and presence of a mineralized matrix was confirmed by red staining (Alizarin Red S-positive) (panels C and I in Fig. 2). Sc cells at passages P4, P6, and P8 showed a higher proportion of in vitro differentiation into this lineage than that shown by the Vs-derived cells, but the differences were not significant, only showing a tendency (bone p = 0.091). When this osteogenic differentiation potential was analyzed for both cell origins (Sc and Vs together), there was a negative effect with an increase in passages, but the effect was insignificant (panel C in Fig. 3). The amount of mineralized matrix quantification was compared at P4 of cells from both origins, and the Sc-AD-MSCs produced more mineralized matrix than Vs-AD-MSCs (10.67% ± 2.76% vs. 7.41% ± 2.18%, p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). In addition, between P4 and P8, cells of the Sc lineage showed a significant progressive decrease in mineralization matrix (10.67% ± 2.76% vs. 7.44 ± 1.96% vs. 2.42 ± 2.73%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5). It was not possible to evaluate the Vs mineralization matrix potential, because of the marked loss of osteogenic potential in sequential passages of Vs cells.
Fig. 4

In vitro bone matrix synthesis capacity of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells of subcutaneous (Sc) and visceral (Vs) origins at P4 (n = 5). Macroscopic and microscopic (40×) images of Sc (A and B) and Vs (C and D) cells. The Sc cells showed a greater capacity for matrix synthesis than that shown by Vs cells (E). *p < 0.05.

Fig. 5

Comparison of in vitro bone matrix synthesis capacity of subcutaneous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells at different passages (n = 5). Microscopic images (40×) at P4 (A), P6 (B), and P8 (C). A significant difference is detected between P6 and P8 (D), **p < 0.001.

Discussion

In this study, extraction of AT was performed in a group of young canines undergoing ovariectomy, which is a routine surgery and is usually done on healthy and young animals. It is relatively easy to obtain great amounts of AT for AD-MSCs during that surgery without significant risk for the tissue donor, thus making it such canines a suitable donor population to build a bank of cryopreserved MSCs, which supports comments by other researchers [1617]. In compliance with international recommendations [5], we used the name MSC for cells of both origins that exhibited fibroblastic morphology, plastic-adherence, MSC marker positivity, and in vitro tri-differentiation (adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts) ability. AD-MSCs of both origins, Sc and Vs, were positive for CD44 and CD90 and negative for CD45. Other authors have described similar phenotypes in canine AD-MSCs [16242730]. Under our study conditions, more than 90% of the AD-MSCs of Sc and Vs origin expressed CD44, which is similar to results presented by other authors [1527]; although Martinello et al. [16] described a lower CD44 expression level (88% for Vs-AD-MSCs). In contrast, we showed that more than 70% of both AD-MSCs lineages expressed CD90, but other authors have described higher (87% [30]) or lower (35% [16] and 22.55% [27]) expressions. Screven et al. [24] reported higher individual variations and described two categories: one between 10% to 40% expression and other more than 40%. The differences in these studies may be due to the fact that antibodies are not specific for canine markers as they have been designed for mice or humans antigens [222427]. Another reason could be that the cells were evaluated at different passages and were from different origins: Takemitsu et al. [27] worked with AD-MSCs of inguinal Sc origin on P2, Martinello et al. [16] with AD-MSCs of periovaric Vs at passages P3–P6, and Screven et al. [24] on Sc AD-MSCs at P3–P5. These variations in the expression of CD90 have been described in canines [2427] and other species [8121823]. This heterogeneity of expression indicates that anti-CD90 antibodies, designed for humans and mice, may not be appropriate for immunophenotyping canine MSCs. Nevertheless, we observed a high and conserved expression of CD44 at different passages, which supports the results reported by other authors [112730]. We observed a very low expression of CD45, as has also been reported by other authors [162730], which is foreseeable as it is a hematopoietic cell marker. Some authors have proposed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to measure CD44 and CD90 mRNA as an method to avoid the problem of the limited availability of canine-specific MSCs antibodies [1522]. By using flow cytometry, we observed that CD44 and CD90 are expressed at the surface up to P8, similar to the expressions in humans of up to P10 reported by Baglioni et al. [4]. Nevertheless, contradictory results have been reported when using real-time PCR, as CD90 expression decreases at P4 [22], while CD44 and CD90 decrease at P7 [15]. In our work, Sc-origin cells showed a tendency for a higher proportion of differentiation than Vs-origin cells (adipose p = 0.091, cartilage p = 0.095, and bone p = 0.091). Other authors describe similar multipotentialities between those two origins [49]. The tendencies in our results might become differences if the study is repeated with more animals. In our study, adipose differentiation of canine Sc- and Vs-AD-MSCs, revealed few and small lipid vacuoles, similar as the results described by Vieira et al. [30]. Even though other authors do not express concern about these vacuole characteristics in the text, the pictures in their publications reveal very few lipid vacuoles [1516]. On the other hand, it might not be a difference related to the species being studied, as Guercio et al. [9] have described canine cells having big and several lipid vacuoles, as reported in humans [4] and mice [28]. The different results observed may also be due to the formulations of the induction media used. Moreover, it has been suggested that classical histochemical staining for detecting adipose differentiation should be considered in the measurement of genic expression biomarkers [515]. Regarding the quantification of in vitro mineralized matrix, significant differences were observed, with the Sc-AD-MSCs showing a higher mineralized matrix percentage than the Vs-AD-MSCs (10.67% ± 2.76% vs. 7.41% ± 2.18%). Other researchers have reported similar results, Sc-derived cells had more gene expression of biomarkers (COLIA1 and RUNX2) of bone differentiation in canine [22] and humans AD-MSCs [3]. However, Baglioni et al. [4] did not find different capacities of mineralized matrix synthesis in human AD-MSCs from Sc and Vs sites at passages P1–P4. Results contrasting ours were obtained in rabbits by Peptan et al. [21] who reported a higher proportion of mineralized matrix in Vs than in Sc cells (35.25% ± 6.36% vs. 15.16% ± 3.51%). These study differences could be due to the use of different species and/or passages as Peptan et al. [21] analyzed P1 (not P4) and the stain used was von Kossa (not Alizarin Red S). However, Kang et al. [11] reported differences in in vitro osteogenic potential but did not detect it in vivo, suggesting that to measure this potential in canines it is more appropriate to use an in vivo model. Our results show that MSCs of Sc and Vs origins behave differently in regard to in vitro plasticity. The Vs lineage exhibited tri-differentiation up to P4, while tri-differentiation in Sc cells was present up to P8, with an accentuated reduction between P6 and P8. A loss of multilineage differentiation potential in subculturing has been observed for canine AD-MSCs by others [915]. In our results, the predominant category at P8 was “non-growth”, which could be due to the cells entering senescence. Martinello et al. [16] described a marked decrease in telomerase activity in canine AD-MSCs from P8 onward, indicating that cells started undergoing senescence. Requicha et al. [22] reported that, by assessing biomarker gene expression, canine AD-MSCs start losing multipotentiality at P3. Other authors have reported that canine cells conserve plasticity up to P6 [915], which is in agreement with our results showing that the Sc lineage underwent a large decrease between P6 and P8. Nevertheless, Zuk et al. [35] showed that human cells start undergoing senescence at P15, showing that there are differences between species in the longevity of cultures. We believe that it is clinically important and relevant for regenerative therapeutics in animal model or veterinary medicine, to determine at what passage the MSCs conserve their stemness capacity. Such beliefs have been expressed by others [915]. We observed a difference in plasticity of AD-MSCs based on AT origin, with Sc-derived MSCs differentiating at higher passages than Vs MSCs. The hypothesis that cells have memory of the site of extraction, might explain the differences detected in our study, differences that support observations reported by others [3922]. The basis of this hypothesis derives from the metabolism of glucose in a diabetes murine model, in which Sc-AT is more efficient than Vs-AT in glucose metabolism [1029]. In conclusion, our results show that the Sc-AD-MSC lineage has advantages over the Vs-AD-MSC lineage due to Sc-AD-MSCs having tri-differentiation capacity at higher passages, a higher in vitro bone mineralized matrix synthesis capacity, and a less invasive method of AT extraction. Although working with Sc-AD-MSCs in culture is more practical and efficient than working with Vs-AD-MSCs, more research is necessary to determine whether the differences observed in vitro are maintained in vivo.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Multipotential differentiation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Brian M Strem; Kevin C Hicok; Min Zhu; Isabella Wulur; Zeni Alfonso; Ronda E Schreiber; John K Fraser; Marc H Hedrick
Journal:  Keio J Med       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  Stem cells in the umbilical cord.

Authors:  Mark L Weiss; Deryl L Troyer
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Beneficial effects of subcutaneous fat transplantation on metabolism.

Authors:  Thien T Tran; Yuji Yamamoto; Stephane Gesta; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 27.287

4.  Immunophenotype and gene expression profile of mesenchymal stem cells derived from canine adipose tissue and bone marrow.

Authors:  Rudell Screven; Elizabeth Kenyon; Michael J Myers; Haile F Yancy; Mark Skasko; Lynne Boxer; Elmer C Bigley; Dori L Borjesson; Min Zhu
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.046

5.  Isolation, characterization, and differentiation potential of canine adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  N M Vieira; V Brandalise; E Zucconi; M Secco; B E Strauss; M Zatz
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Translating stem cell therapies: the role of companion animals in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Susan W Volk; Christine Theoret
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells induce immunomodulatory macrophages which protect from experimental colitis and sepsis.

Authors:  Per Anderson; Luciana Souza-Moreira; Maria Morell; Marta Caro; Francisco O'Valle; Elena Gonzalez-Rey; Mario Delgado
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Canine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): characterization in relation to donor age and adipose tissue-harvesting site.

Authors:  Annalisa Guercio; Santina Di Bella; Stefania Casella; Patrizia Di Marco; Carmelo Russo; Giuseppe Piccione
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Stromal cells from the adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells: a joint statement of the International Federation for Adipose Therapeutics and Science (IFATS) and the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT).

Authors:  Philippe Bourin; Bruce A Bunnell; Louis Casteilla; Massimo Dominici; Adam J Katz; Keith L March; Heinz Redl; J Peter Rubin; Kotaro Yoshimura; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 5.414

10.  Mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  A I Caplan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Manufacturing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis in Canine Patients: Challenges and Recommendations.

Authors:  Ana Ivanovska; Mengyu Wang; Tarlan Eslami Arshaghi; Georgina Shaw; Joel Alves; Andrew Byrne; Steven Butterworth; Russell Chandler; Laura Cuddy; James Dunne; Shane Guerin; Rob Harry; Aidan McAlindan; Ronan A Mullins; Frank Barry
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Investigation of stemness and multipotency of equine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) from different fat sources in comparison with lipoma.

Authors:  Stefan Arnhold; Mohamed I Elashry; Michele C Klymiuk; Florian Geburek
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Comparison of Fat Harvested from Flank and Falciform Regions for Stem Cell Therapy in Dogs.

Authors:  Alexandra Jifcovici; Miguel A Solano; Noel Fitzpatrick; Laurent Findji; Gordon Blunn; Anita Sanghani-Kerai
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-25

4.  Tissue Harvesting Site Effect on the Canine Adipose Stromal Vascular Fraction Quantity and Quality.

Authors:  Hanan Hendawy; Akiko Uemura; Danfu Ma; Ryosuke Namiki; Haney Samir; Mahmoud F Ahmed; Ahmed Elfadadny; Hussein M El-Husseiny; Cheng Chieh-Jen; Ryou Tanaka
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Updates on mesenchymal stem cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration in large animal models.

Authors:  Timothy P Liu; Pin Ha; Crystal Y Xiao; Sang Yub Kim; Andrew R Jensen; Jeremiah Easley; Qingqiang Yao; Xinli Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Comparison of Sources and Methods for the Isolation of Equine Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal/Stem Cells and Preliminary Results on Their Reaction to Incubation with 5-Azacytidine.

Authors:  Dagmar S Trachsel; Hannah J Stage; Sebastian Rausch; Susanne Trappe; Katharina Söllig; Gerhard Sponder; Roswitha Merle; Jörg R Aschenbach; Heidrun Gehlen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.231

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.