Literature DB >> 28692842

PK-driven prophylaxis versus standard prophylaxis: When a tailored treatment may be a real and achievable cost-saving approach in children with severe hemophilia A.

Samantha Pasca1, Marta Milan2, Lucia Sarolo2, Ezio Zanon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis is the gold standard for the treatment of children with severe hemophilia. In the last years a new approach to prophylaxis based on annual bleeding rate (ABR), pharmacokinetics (PK) and lifestyle of each patient has begun to be adopted in hemophilia treatment. AIM: Aim of our observational retrospective study was to evaluate whether in a group of children with severe hemophilia A (HA) a tailored approach may be used to replace standard therapy, reducing costs.
METHODS: PK evaluation was carried out in six hemophiliac children followed at our Hemophilia Center, and already receiving recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) on prophylaxis, using a computing program (MyPKfit®). Bayesian curve was created for each child and tailored prophylaxis was estimated considering a trough level of 1%.
RESULTS: The weekly frequency of infusions was reduced in one patient, while it was slightly increased in three children. As to the remaining children, only the dosage was changed. Scheduled follow-up revealed a complete adherence to treatment, a reduction of bleeds using PK-regimen and a general improvement in the quality of life. The comparison between the direct and indirect costs of treatment during standard and PK-driven prophylaxis showed a total saving of € 54,797.40 (-10.67%) in case of tailored prophylaxis.
CONCLUSION: A therapeutic approach based on PK and clinical characteristics of each patient may change standard treatment. Based on our results, tailored prophylaxis could be an effective option for children with HA reducing costs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of treatment; Hemophilia treatment; Quality of life; Replacement therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28692842     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  12 in total

1.  Handling interoccasion variability in model-based dose individualization using therapeutic drug monitoring data.

Authors:  João A Abrantes; Siv Jönsson; Mats O Karlsson; Elisabet I Nielsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Modern Treatments of Haemophilia: Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paolo A Cortesi; Lucia S D'Angiolella; Alessandra Lafranconi; Mariangela Micale; Giancarlo Cesana; Lorenzo G Mantovani
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Replacement Factor VIII Consumption in Patients with Haemophilia A in Italy: A Comparison between Prophylaxis Pre and Post Octocog Alfa (BAY 81-8973).

Authors:  Paolo Angelo Cortesi; Giovanni Di Minno; Ezio Zanon; Gaetano Giuffrida; Rita Carlotta Santoro; Renato Marino; Lucia Sara D'Angiolella; Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo; Ginevra Squassabia; Francesco Clemente; Danilo Di Laura; Ernesto Cimino; Samantha Pasca; Daniela Nicolosi; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Pharmacokinetic variability of factor VIII concentrates in Chinese pediatric patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A.

Authors:  Zhenping Chen; Kun Huang; Gang Li; Yingzi Zhen; Xinyi Wu; Ai Di; Guoqing Liu; Zekun Li; Iorio Alfonso; Runhui Wu
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2021-03-22

5.  Pharmacokinetic Studies of Factor VIII in Chinese Boys with Severe Hemophilia A: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Zhen-Ping Chen; Pei-Jing Li; Gang Li; Ling Tang; Ying-Zi Zhen; Xin-Yi Wu; Xiao-Ling Cheng; Koon Hung Luke; Victor S Blanchette; Man-Chiu Poon; Qiu-Lan Ding; Run-Hui Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  A Practical, One-Clinic Visit Protocol for Pharmacokinetic Profile Generation with the ADVATE myPKFiT Dosing Tool in Severe Hemophilia A Subjects.

Authors:  Victor S Blanchette; Laura Zunino; Viviane Grassmann; Chris Barnes; Manuel D Carcao; Julie Curtin; Shannon Jackson; Liane Khoo; Vladimir Komrska; David Lillicrap; Massimo Morfini; Gabriela Romanova; Derek Stephens; Ester Zapotocka; Margaret L Rand; Jan Blatny
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 6.681

7.  Impact of pharmacokinetics to reduce bleeding in a cohort of patients with severe hemophilia A in a personalized comprehensive management program.

Authors:  Samuel Sarmiento Doncel; Gina Alejandra Diaz Mosquera; Javier Mauricio Cortes; Nelson Ramirez Plazas; Francisco Javier Meza; Carol Agudelo Rico
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2021-11-26

8.  Bayesian Forecasting Utilizing Bleeding Information to Support Dose Individualization of Factor VIII.

Authors:  João A Abrantes; Alexander Solms; Dirk Garmann; Elisabet I Nielsen; Siv Jönsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-30

9.  Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care.

Authors:  Stacy E Croteau; Michael U Callaghan; Joanna Davis; Amy L Dunn; Michael Guerrera; Osman Khan; Ellis J Neufeld; Leslie J Raffini; Michael Recht; Michael Wang; Alfonso Iorio
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-05-27

Review 10.  Performing and interpreting individual pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with Hemophilia A or B: Rationale and general considerations.

Authors:  Alfonso Iorio; Andrea N Edginton; Victor Blanchette; Jan Blatny; Ana Boban; Marjon Cnossen; Peter Collins; Stacy E Croteau; Katheljin Fischer; Daniel P Hart; Shinya Ito; Joan Korth-Bradley; Stefan Lethagen; David Lillicrap; Mike Makris; Ron Mathôt; Massimo Morfini; Ellis J Neufeld; Jeffrey Spears
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.