PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess surgical practice patterns among the American Glaucoma Society (AGS) membership. METHODS: An anonymous online survey evaluating the use of glaucoma surgeries in various clinical settings was redistributed to AGS members. Survey responses were compared with prior results from 1996, 2002, and 2008 to determine shifts in surgical practice patterns. Questions were added to assess the preferred approach to primary incisional glaucoma surgery and phacoemulsification combined with glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: A total of 252 of 1091 (23%) subscribers to the AGS-net participated in the survey. Percentage use (mean±SD) of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC), glaucoma drainage device (GDD), and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) as an initial surgery in patients with primary open angle glaucoma was 59%±30%, 23%±23%, and 14%±20%, respectively. Phacoemulsification cataract extraction alone was the preferred surgical approach in 44%±32% of patients with primary open angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract, and phacoemulsification cataract extraction was combined with trabeculectomy with MMC in 24%±23%, with MIGS in 22%±27%, and with GDD in 9%±14%. Although trabeculectomy was selected most frequently to surgically manage glaucoma in 8 of 8 clinical settings in 1996, GDD was preferred in 7 of 8 clinical settings in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GDD has increased and that of trabeculectomy has concurrently decreased over the past 2 decades. Trabeculectomy with MMC is the most popular primary incisional surgery when performed alone or in combination with phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Surgeons frequently manage coexistent cataract and glaucoma with cataract extraction alone, rather than as a combined cataract and glaucoma procedure.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess surgical practice patterns among the American Glaucoma Society (AGS) membership. METHODS: An anonymous online survey evaluating the use of glaucoma surgeries in various clinical settings was redistributed to AGS members. Survey responses were compared with prior results from 1996, 2002, and 2008 to determine shifts in surgical practice patterns. Questions were added to assess the preferred approach to primary incisional glaucoma surgery and phacoemulsification combined with glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: A total of 252 of 1091 (23%) subscribers to the AGS-net participated in the survey. Percentage use (mean±SD) of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC), glaucoma drainage device (GDD), and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) as an initial surgery in patients with primary open angle glaucoma was 59%±30%, 23%±23%, and 14%±20%, respectively. Phacoemulsification cataract extraction alone was the preferred surgical approach in 44%±32% of patients with primary open angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract, and phacoemulsification cataract extraction was combined with trabeculectomy with MMC in 24%±23%, with MIGS in 22%±27%, and with GDD in 9%±14%. Although trabeculectomy was selected most frequently to surgically manage glaucoma in 8 of 8 clinical settings in 1996, GDD was preferred in 7 of 8 clinical settings in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GDD has increased and that of trabeculectomy has concurrently decreased over the past 2 decades. Trabeculectomy with MMC is the most popular primary incisional surgery when performed alone or in combination with phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Surgeons frequently manage coexistent cataract and glaucoma with cataract extraction alone, rather than as a combined cataract and glaucoma procedure.
Authors: Henry D Jampel; Jason F Solus; Patricia A Tracey; Donna L Gilbert; Tara L Loyd; Joan L Jefferys; Harry A Quigley Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Maria Cecilia D Aquino; Keith Barton; Anna Marie W T Tan; Chelvin Sng; Xiang Li; Seng Chee Loon; Paul T K Chew Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Joseph F Panarelli; Michael R Banitt; Steven J Gedde; Wei Shi; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sapna Sinha; Allen Y Ganjei; Melih Ustaoglu; Zeba A Syed; Daniel Lee; Jonathan S Myers; Scott J Fudemberg; Reza Razeghinejad Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Natalia S Anisimova; Lisa B Arbisser; Sergey I Anisimov; Lusine L Arutyunyan; Natalya F Shilova; Gilyana Bashaeva; Roman V Kirtaev; Svetlana Yu Anisimova Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 2.031